Cargando…

Continuous exercise induces airway epithelium damage while a matched-intensity and volume intermittent exercise does not

BACKGROUND: While continuous exercise (CE) induces greater ventilation ([Formula: see text] (E)) when compared to intermittent exercise (IE), little is known of the consequences on airway damage. Our aim was to investigate markers of epithelial cell damage – i.e. serum levels of CC16 and of the CC16...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Combes, Adrien, Dekerle, Jeanne, Dumont, Xavier, Twomey, Rosie, Bernard, Alfred, Daussin, Frédéric, Bougault, Valérie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6337858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30654798
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-019-0978-1
_version_ 1783388347946762240
author Combes, Adrien
Dekerle, Jeanne
Dumont, Xavier
Twomey, Rosie
Bernard, Alfred
Daussin, Frédéric
Bougault, Valérie
author_facet Combes, Adrien
Dekerle, Jeanne
Dumont, Xavier
Twomey, Rosie
Bernard, Alfred
Daussin, Frédéric
Bougault, Valérie
author_sort Combes, Adrien
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: While continuous exercise (CE) induces greater ventilation ([Formula: see text] (E)) when compared to intermittent exercise (IE), little is known of the consequences on airway damage. Our aim was to investigate markers of epithelial cell damage – i.e. serum levels of CC16 and of the CC16/SP-D ratio - during and following a bout of CE and IE of matched work. METHODS: Sixteen healthy young adults performed a 30-min continuous (CE) and a 60-min intermittent exercise (IE; 1-min work: 1-min rest) on separate occasions in a random order. Intensity was set at 70% of their maximum work rate (WR(max)). Heart rate (HR) and [Formula: see text] (E) were measured throughout both tests. Blood samples were taken at rest, after the 10th min of the warm-up, at the end of both exercises, half way through IE (matched time but 50% work done for IE) as well as 30- and 60-min post-exercise. Lactate and CC16 and SP-D were determined. RESULTS: Mean [Formula: see text] (E) was higher for CE compared to IE (85 ± 17 l.min(− 1) vs 50 ± 8 l.min(− 1), respectively; P < 0.001). Serum-based markers of epithelial cell damage remained unchanged during IE. Interaction of test × time was observed for SP-D (P = 0.02), CC16 (μg.l(− 1)) (P = 0.006) and CC16/SP-D ratio (P = 0.03). Maximum delta CC16/SP-D was significantly correlated with mean [Formula: see text] (E) sustained (r = 0.83, P < 0.001) during CE but not during IE. CONCLUSION: The 30-min CE performed at 70% WR(max) induced mild airway damage, while a time- or work-matched IE did not. The extent of the damage during CE was associated with the higher ventilation rate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6337858
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63378582019-01-23 Continuous exercise induces airway epithelium damage while a matched-intensity and volume intermittent exercise does not Combes, Adrien Dekerle, Jeanne Dumont, Xavier Twomey, Rosie Bernard, Alfred Daussin, Frédéric Bougault, Valérie Respir Res Research BACKGROUND: While continuous exercise (CE) induces greater ventilation ([Formula: see text] (E)) when compared to intermittent exercise (IE), little is known of the consequences on airway damage. Our aim was to investigate markers of epithelial cell damage – i.e. serum levels of CC16 and of the CC16/SP-D ratio - during and following a bout of CE and IE of matched work. METHODS: Sixteen healthy young adults performed a 30-min continuous (CE) and a 60-min intermittent exercise (IE; 1-min work: 1-min rest) on separate occasions in a random order. Intensity was set at 70% of their maximum work rate (WR(max)). Heart rate (HR) and [Formula: see text] (E) were measured throughout both tests. Blood samples were taken at rest, after the 10th min of the warm-up, at the end of both exercises, half way through IE (matched time but 50% work done for IE) as well as 30- and 60-min post-exercise. Lactate and CC16 and SP-D were determined. RESULTS: Mean [Formula: see text] (E) was higher for CE compared to IE (85 ± 17 l.min(− 1) vs 50 ± 8 l.min(− 1), respectively; P < 0.001). Serum-based markers of epithelial cell damage remained unchanged during IE. Interaction of test × time was observed for SP-D (P = 0.02), CC16 (μg.l(− 1)) (P = 0.006) and CC16/SP-D ratio (P = 0.03). Maximum delta CC16/SP-D was significantly correlated with mean [Formula: see text] (E) sustained (r = 0.83, P < 0.001) during CE but not during IE. CONCLUSION: The 30-min CE performed at 70% WR(max) induced mild airway damage, while a time- or work-matched IE did not. The extent of the damage during CE was associated with the higher ventilation rate. BioMed Central 2019-01-17 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6337858/ /pubmed/30654798 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-019-0978-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Combes, Adrien
Dekerle, Jeanne
Dumont, Xavier
Twomey, Rosie
Bernard, Alfred
Daussin, Frédéric
Bougault, Valérie
Continuous exercise induces airway epithelium damage while a matched-intensity and volume intermittent exercise does not
title Continuous exercise induces airway epithelium damage while a matched-intensity and volume intermittent exercise does not
title_full Continuous exercise induces airway epithelium damage while a matched-intensity and volume intermittent exercise does not
title_fullStr Continuous exercise induces airway epithelium damage while a matched-intensity and volume intermittent exercise does not
title_full_unstemmed Continuous exercise induces airway epithelium damage while a matched-intensity and volume intermittent exercise does not
title_short Continuous exercise induces airway epithelium damage while a matched-intensity and volume intermittent exercise does not
title_sort continuous exercise induces airway epithelium damage while a matched-intensity and volume intermittent exercise does not
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6337858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30654798
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-019-0978-1
work_keys_str_mv AT combesadrien continuousexerciseinducesairwayepitheliumdamagewhileamatchedintensityandvolumeintermittentexercisedoesnot
AT dekerlejeanne continuousexerciseinducesairwayepitheliumdamagewhileamatchedintensityandvolumeintermittentexercisedoesnot
AT dumontxavier continuousexerciseinducesairwayepitheliumdamagewhileamatchedintensityandvolumeintermittentexercisedoesnot
AT twomeyrosie continuousexerciseinducesairwayepitheliumdamagewhileamatchedintensityandvolumeintermittentexercisedoesnot
AT bernardalfred continuousexerciseinducesairwayepitheliumdamagewhileamatchedintensityandvolumeintermittentexercisedoesnot
AT daussinfrederic continuousexerciseinducesairwayepitheliumdamagewhileamatchedintensityandvolumeintermittentexercisedoesnot
AT bougaultvalerie continuousexerciseinducesairwayepitheliumdamagewhileamatchedintensityandvolumeintermittentexercisedoesnot