Cargando…
Does guideline non-adherence result in worse clinical outcomes for hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer in premenopausal women?: result of an institution database from South Korea
BACKGROUND: In this study, we observe the patterns initial palliative treatment for premenopausal patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative MBC and determine if nonadherence to clinical guidelines are associated with worse clinical outcomes in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6337867/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30654765 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-5258-9 |
_version_ | 1783388350073274368 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Hee Kyung Lee, Soo-Hyeon Kim, Yu Jin Park, Song Ee Lee, Han Sang Lim, Sung Won Cho, Jang Ho Kim, Ji-Yeon Ahn, Jin Seok Im, Young-Hyuck Yu, Jong Han Park, Yeon Hee |
author_facet | Kim, Hee Kyung Lee, Soo-Hyeon Kim, Yu Jin Park, Song Ee Lee, Han Sang Lim, Sung Won Cho, Jang Ho Kim, Ji-Yeon Ahn, Jin Seok Im, Young-Hyuck Yu, Jong Han Park, Yeon Hee |
author_sort | Kim, Hee Kyung |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In this study, we observe the patterns initial palliative treatment for premenopausal patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative MBC and determine if nonadherence to clinical guidelines are associated with worse clinical outcomes in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the South Korean population. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed for premenopausal patients diagnosed with HR-positive/HER2-negative MBC between October 1997 and May 2016 who received palliative systemic treatments at a large tertiary medical center. Survival outcomes were analyzed according to the palliative treatment received prior to disease progression. RESULTS: The review identified a total of 272 premenopausal patients meeting study criteria, whose median age was 39 years. Endocrine therapy was the initial treatment in 137 patients (Group 1) with chemotherapy as initial treatment in 135 patients. In the latter group, chemotherapy was continued in 78 patients (Group 2), whereas chemotherapy was switched to endocrine treatment in 57 patients prior to any disease progression (Group 3). Both PFS and OS were significantly longer for chemotherapy-endocrine therapy (median PFS 18.2 months and OS 85.2 months) than for chemotherapy-alone (median PFS 12.6 months and OS 45.5 months) or endocrine therapy-alone (median PFS 7.0 months and OS 57.3 months) (all p values < 0.01). In multivariate analysis, chemotherapy-endocrine therapy was an independent predictive value for improved PFS and OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.33, 95% CI 0.20–0.52, p < 0.001; HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.19–0.73, p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: In our study population, chemotherapy alone was not objectively inferior to endocrine therapy as the initial palliative treatment. In addition, chemotherapy followed by endocrine therapy was associated with objective higher response rate than endocrine therapy alone. Further studies should explore the relationship between non-adherent treatment patterns and patient outcomes across the largely premenopausal breast cancer populations across Asian countries. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-018-5258-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6337867 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63378672019-01-23 Does guideline non-adherence result in worse clinical outcomes for hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer in premenopausal women?: result of an institution database from South Korea Kim, Hee Kyung Lee, Soo-Hyeon Kim, Yu Jin Park, Song Ee Lee, Han Sang Lim, Sung Won Cho, Jang Ho Kim, Ji-Yeon Ahn, Jin Seok Im, Young-Hyuck Yu, Jong Han Park, Yeon Hee BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: In this study, we observe the patterns initial palliative treatment for premenopausal patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative MBC and determine if nonadherence to clinical guidelines are associated with worse clinical outcomes in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the South Korean population. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed for premenopausal patients diagnosed with HR-positive/HER2-negative MBC between October 1997 and May 2016 who received palliative systemic treatments at a large tertiary medical center. Survival outcomes were analyzed according to the palliative treatment received prior to disease progression. RESULTS: The review identified a total of 272 premenopausal patients meeting study criteria, whose median age was 39 years. Endocrine therapy was the initial treatment in 137 patients (Group 1) with chemotherapy as initial treatment in 135 patients. In the latter group, chemotherapy was continued in 78 patients (Group 2), whereas chemotherapy was switched to endocrine treatment in 57 patients prior to any disease progression (Group 3). Both PFS and OS were significantly longer for chemotherapy-endocrine therapy (median PFS 18.2 months and OS 85.2 months) than for chemotherapy-alone (median PFS 12.6 months and OS 45.5 months) or endocrine therapy-alone (median PFS 7.0 months and OS 57.3 months) (all p values < 0.01). In multivariate analysis, chemotherapy-endocrine therapy was an independent predictive value for improved PFS and OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.33, 95% CI 0.20–0.52, p < 0.001; HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.19–0.73, p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: In our study population, chemotherapy alone was not objectively inferior to endocrine therapy as the initial palliative treatment. In addition, chemotherapy followed by endocrine therapy was associated with objective higher response rate than endocrine therapy alone. Further studies should explore the relationship between non-adherent treatment patterns and patient outcomes across the largely premenopausal breast cancer populations across Asian countries. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-018-5258-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6337867/ /pubmed/30654765 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-5258-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kim, Hee Kyung Lee, Soo-Hyeon Kim, Yu Jin Park, Song Ee Lee, Han Sang Lim, Sung Won Cho, Jang Ho Kim, Ji-Yeon Ahn, Jin Seok Im, Young-Hyuck Yu, Jong Han Park, Yeon Hee Does guideline non-adherence result in worse clinical outcomes for hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer in premenopausal women?: result of an institution database from South Korea |
title | Does guideline non-adherence result in worse clinical outcomes for hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer in premenopausal women?: result of an institution database from South Korea |
title_full | Does guideline non-adherence result in worse clinical outcomes for hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer in premenopausal women?: result of an institution database from South Korea |
title_fullStr | Does guideline non-adherence result in worse clinical outcomes for hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer in premenopausal women?: result of an institution database from South Korea |
title_full_unstemmed | Does guideline non-adherence result in worse clinical outcomes for hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer in premenopausal women?: result of an institution database from South Korea |
title_short | Does guideline non-adherence result in worse clinical outcomes for hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer in premenopausal women?: result of an institution database from South Korea |
title_sort | does guideline non-adherence result in worse clinical outcomes for hormone receptor-positive and her2-negative metastatic breast cancer in premenopausal women?: result of an institution database from south korea |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6337867/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30654765 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-5258-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimheekyung doesguidelinenonadherenceresultinworseclinicaloutcomesforhormonereceptorpositiveandher2negativemetastaticbreastcancerinpremenopausalwomenresultofaninstitutiondatabasefromsouthkorea AT leesoohyeon doesguidelinenonadherenceresultinworseclinicaloutcomesforhormonereceptorpositiveandher2negativemetastaticbreastcancerinpremenopausalwomenresultofaninstitutiondatabasefromsouthkorea AT kimyujin doesguidelinenonadherenceresultinworseclinicaloutcomesforhormonereceptorpositiveandher2negativemetastaticbreastcancerinpremenopausalwomenresultofaninstitutiondatabasefromsouthkorea AT parksongee doesguidelinenonadherenceresultinworseclinicaloutcomesforhormonereceptorpositiveandher2negativemetastaticbreastcancerinpremenopausalwomenresultofaninstitutiondatabasefromsouthkorea AT leehansang doesguidelinenonadherenceresultinworseclinicaloutcomesforhormonereceptorpositiveandher2negativemetastaticbreastcancerinpremenopausalwomenresultofaninstitutiondatabasefromsouthkorea AT limsungwon doesguidelinenonadherenceresultinworseclinicaloutcomesforhormonereceptorpositiveandher2negativemetastaticbreastcancerinpremenopausalwomenresultofaninstitutiondatabasefromsouthkorea AT chojangho doesguidelinenonadherenceresultinworseclinicaloutcomesforhormonereceptorpositiveandher2negativemetastaticbreastcancerinpremenopausalwomenresultofaninstitutiondatabasefromsouthkorea AT kimjiyeon doesguidelinenonadherenceresultinworseclinicaloutcomesforhormonereceptorpositiveandher2negativemetastaticbreastcancerinpremenopausalwomenresultofaninstitutiondatabasefromsouthkorea AT ahnjinseok doesguidelinenonadherenceresultinworseclinicaloutcomesforhormonereceptorpositiveandher2negativemetastaticbreastcancerinpremenopausalwomenresultofaninstitutiondatabasefromsouthkorea AT imyounghyuck doesguidelinenonadherenceresultinworseclinicaloutcomesforhormonereceptorpositiveandher2negativemetastaticbreastcancerinpremenopausalwomenresultofaninstitutiondatabasefromsouthkorea AT yujonghan doesguidelinenonadherenceresultinworseclinicaloutcomesforhormonereceptorpositiveandher2negativemetastaticbreastcancerinpremenopausalwomenresultofaninstitutiondatabasefromsouthkorea AT parkyeonhee doesguidelinenonadherenceresultinworseclinicaloutcomesforhormonereceptorpositiveandher2negativemetastaticbreastcancerinpremenopausalwomenresultofaninstitutiondatabasefromsouthkorea |