Cargando…

Nuclear envelope expansion in budding yeast is independent of cell growth and does not determine nuclear volume

Most cells exhibit a constant ratio between nuclear and cell volume. The mechanism dictating this constant ratio and the nuclear component(s) that scale with cell size are not known. To address this, we examined the consequences to the size and shape of the budding yeast nucleus when cell expansion...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Walters, Alison D., Amoateng, Kwabena, Wang, Renjie, Chen, Jian-Hua, McDermott, Gerry, Larabell, Carolyn A., Gadal, Olivier, Cohen-Fix, Orna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The American Society for Cell Biology 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6337908/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30379612
http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E18-04-0204
_version_ 1783388357839028224
author Walters, Alison D.
Amoateng, Kwabena
Wang, Renjie
Chen, Jian-Hua
McDermott, Gerry
Larabell, Carolyn A.
Gadal, Olivier
Cohen-Fix, Orna
author_facet Walters, Alison D.
Amoateng, Kwabena
Wang, Renjie
Chen, Jian-Hua
McDermott, Gerry
Larabell, Carolyn A.
Gadal, Olivier
Cohen-Fix, Orna
author_sort Walters, Alison D.
collection PubMed
description Most cells exhibit a constant ratio between nuclear and cell volume. The mechanism dictating this constant ratio and the nuclear component(s) that scale with cell size are not known. To address this, we examined the consequences to the size and shape of the budding yeast nucleus when cell expansion is inhibited by down-regulating components of the secretory pathway. We find that under conditions where cell size increase is restrained, the nucleus becomes bilobed, with the bulk of the DNA in one lobe and the nucleolus in the other. The formation of bilobed nuclei is dependent on fatty acid and phospholipid synthesis, suggesting that it is associated with nuclear membrane expansion. Bilobed nuclei appeared predominantly after spindle pole body separation, suggesting that nuclear envelope expansion follows cell-cycle cues rather than cell size. Importantly, cells with bilobed nuclei had the same nuclear:cell volume ratio as cells with round nuclei. Therefore, the bilobed nucleus could be a consequence of continued NE expansion as cells traverse the cell cycle without an accompanying increase in nuclear volume due to the inhibition of cell growth. Our data suggest that nuclear volume is not determined by nuclear envelope availability but by one or more nucleoplasmic factors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6337908
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher The American Society for Cell Biology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63379082019-03-16 Nuclear envelope expansion in budding yeast is independent of cell growth and does not determine nuclear volume Walters, Alison D. Amoateng, Kwabena Wang, Renjie Chen, Jian-Hua McDermott, Gerry Larabell, Carolyn A. Gadal, Olivier Cohen-Fix, Orna Mol Biol Cell Articles Most cells exhibit a constant ratio between nuclear and cell volume. The mechanism dictating this constant ratio and the nuclear component(s) that scale with cell size are not known. To address this, we examined the consequences to the size and shape of the budding yeast nucleus when cell expansion is inhibited by down-regulating components of the secretory pathway. We find that under conditions where cell size increase is restrained, the nucleus becomes bilobed, with the bulk of the DNA in one lobe and the nucleolus in the other. The formation of bilobed nuclei is dependent on fatty acid and phospholipid synthesis, suggesting that it is associated with nuclear membrane expansion. Bilobed nuclei appeared predominantly after spindle pole body separation, suggesting that nuclear envelope expansion follows cell-cycle cues rather than cell size. Importantly, cells with bilobed nuclei had the same nuclear:cell volume ratio as cells with round nuclei. Therefore, the bilobed nucleus could be a consequence of continued NE expansion as cells traverse the cell cycle without an accompanying increase in nuclear volume due to the inhibition of cell growth. Our data suggest that nuclear volume is not determined by nuclear envelope availability but by one or more nucleoplasmic factors. The American Society for Cell Biology 2019-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6337908/ /pubmed/30379612 http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E18-04-0204 Text en © 2019 Walters, Amoateng, et al. “ASCB®,” “The American Society for Cell Biology®,” and “Molecular Biology of the Cell®” are registered trademarks of The American Society for Cell Biology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This article is distributed by The American Society for Cell Biology under license from the author(s). Two months after publication it is available to the public under an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported Creative Commons License.
spellingShingle Articles
Walters, Alison D.
Amoateng, Kwabena
Wang, Renjie
Chen, Jian-Hua
McDermott, Gerry
Larabell, Carolyn A.
Gadal, Olivier
Cohen-Fix, Orna
Nuclear envelope expansion in budding yeast is independent of cell growth and does not determine nuclear volume
title Nuclear envelope expansion in budding yeast is independent of cell growth and does not determine nuclear volume
title_full Nuclear envelope expansion in budding yeast is independent of cell growth and does not determine nuclear volume
title_fullStr Nuclear envelope expansion in budding yeast is independent of cell growth and does not determine nuclear volume
title_full_unstemmed Nuclear envelope expansion in budding yeast is independent of cell growth and does not determine nuclear volume
title_short Nuclear envelope expansion in budding yeast is independent of cell growth and does not determine nuclear volume
title_sort nuclear envelope expansion in budding yeast is independent of cell growth and does not determine nuclear volume
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6337908/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30379612
http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E18-04-0204
work_keys_str_mv AT waltersalisond nuclearenvelopeexpansioninbuddingyeastisindependentofcellgrowthanddoesnotdeterminenuclearvolume
AT amoatengkwabena nuclearenvelopeexpansioninbuddingyeastisindependentofcellgrowthanddoesnotdeterminenuclearvolume
AT wangrenjie nuclearenvelopeexpansioninbuddingyeastisindependentofcellgrowthanddoesnotdeterminenuclearvolume
AT chenjianhua nuclearenvelopeexpansioninbuddingyeastisindependentofcellgrowthanddoesnotdeterminenuclearvolume
AT mcdermottgerry nuclearenvelopeexpansioninbuddingyeastisindependentofcellgrowthanddoesnotdeterminenuclearvolume
AT larabellcarolyna nuclearenvelopeexpansioninbuddingyeastisindependentofcellgrowthanddoesnotdeterminenuclearvolume
AT gadalolivier nuclearenvelopeexpansioninbuddingyeastisindependentofcellgrowthanddoesnotdeterminenuclearvolume
AT cohenfixorna nuclearenvelopeexpansioninbuddingyeastisindependentofcellgrowthanddoesnotdeterminenuclearvolume