Cargando…
Reconciling the opposing effects of neurobiological evidence on criminal sentencing judgments
Legal theorists have characterized physical evidence of brain dysfunction as a double-edged sword, wherein the very quality that reduces the defendant’s responsibility for his transgression could simultaneously increase motivations to punish him by virtue of his apparently increased dangerousness. H...
Autores principales: | Allen, Corey H., Vold, Karina, Felsen, Gidon, Blumenthal-Barby, Jennifer S., Aharoni, Eyal |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6338372/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30657761 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210584 |
Ejemplares similares
-
To Blame or to Forgive? Reconciling Punishment and Forgiveness in Criminal Justice
por: Lacey, Nicola, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
The Neurobiology of Decision-Making and Responsibility: Reconciling Mechanism and Mindedness
por: Shadlen, Michael N., et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Reorganization of the Neurobiology of Language After Sentence Overlearning
por: Skipper, Jeremy I, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Neuroscience, criminal responsibility and sentencing in an islamic country: Iran
por: Alimardani, Armin
Publicado: (2018) -
Comparing sentencing judgments of judges and laypeople: The role of justifications
por: Watamura, Eiichiro, et al.
Publicado: (2022)