Cargando…

Polyp detection with computer-aided diagnosis in white light colonoscopy: comparison of three different methods

Background and study aims  Detection of polyps during colonoscopy is essential for screening colorectal cancer and computer-aided-diagnosis (CAD) could be helpful for this objective. The goal of this study was to assess the efficacy of CAD in detection of polyps in video colonoscopy by using three m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Figueiredo, Pedro N., Figueiredo, Isabel N., Pinto, Luís, Kumar, Sunil, Tsai, Yen-Hsi Richard, Mamonov, Alexander V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2019
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6338549/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30705955
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0808-4456
_version_ 1783388456724987904
author Figueiredo, Pedro N.
Figueiredo, Isabel N.
Pinto, Luís
Kumar, Sunil
Tsai, Yen-Hsi Richard
Mamonov, Alexander V.
author_facet Figueiredo, Pedro N.
Figueiredo, Isabel N.
Pinto, Luís
Kumar, Sunil
Tsai, Yen-Hsi Richard
Mamonov, Alexander V.
author_sort Figueiredo, Pedro N.
collection PubMed
description Background and study aims  Detection of polyps during colonoscopy is essential for screening colorectal cancer and computer-aided-diagnosis (CAD) could be helpful for this objective. The goal of this study was to assess the efficacy of CAD in detection of polyps in video colonoscopy by using three methods we have proposed and applied for diagnosis of polyps in wireless capsule colonoscopy. Patients and methods  Forty-two patients were included in the study, each one bearing one polyp. A dataset was generated with a total of 1680 polyp instances and 1360 frames of normal mucosa. We used three methods, that are all binary classifiers, labelling a frame as either containing a polyp or not. Two of the methods (Methods 1 and 2) are threshold-based and address the problem of polyp detection (i. e. separation between normal mucosa frames and polyp frames) and the problem of polyp localization (i. e. the ability to locate the polyp in a frame). The third method (Method 3) belongs to the class of machine learning methods and only addresses the polyp detection problem. The mathematical techniques underlying these three methods rely on appropriate fusion of information about the shape, color and texture content of the objects presented in the medical images. Results  Regarding polyp localization, the best method is Method 1 with a sensitivity of 71.8 %. Comparing the performance of the three methods in the detection of polyps, independently of the precision in the location of the lesions, Method 3 stands out, achieving a sensitivity of 99.7 %, an accuracy of 91.1 %, and a specificity of 84.9 %. Conclusion  CAD, using the three studied methods, showed good accuracy in the detection of polyps with white light colonoscopy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6338549
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher © Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63385492019-02-01 Polyp detection with computer-aided diagnosis in white light colonoscopy: comparison of three different methods Figueiredo, Pedro N. Figueiredo, Isabel N. Pinto, Luís Kumar, Sunil Tsai, Yen-Hsi Richard Mamonov, Alexander V. Endosc Int Open Background and study aims  Detection of polyps during colonoscopy is essential for screening colorectal cancer and computer-aided-diagnosis (CAD) could be helpful for this objective. The goal of this study was to assess the efficacy of CAD in detection of polyps in video colonoscopy by using three methods we have proposed and applied for diagnosis of polyps in wireless capsule colonoscopy. Patients and methods  Forty-two patients were included in the study, each one bearing one polyp. A dataset was generated with a total of 1680 polyp instances and 1360 frames of normal mucosa. We used three methods, that are all binary classifiers, labelling a frame as either containing a polyp or not. Two of the methods (Methods 1 and 2) are threshold-based and address the problem of polyp detection (i. e. separation between normal mucosa frames and polyp frames) and the problem of polyp localization (i. e. the ability to locate the polyp in a frame). The third method (Method 3) belongs to the class of machine learning methods and only addresses the polyp detection problem. The mathematical techniques underlying these three methods rely on appropriate fusion of information about the shape, color and texture content of the objects presented in the medical images. Results  Regarding polyp localization, the best method is Method 1 with a sensitivity of 71.8 %. Comparing the performance of the three methods in the detection of polyps, independently of the precision in the location of the lesions, Method 3 stands out, achieving a sensitivity of 99.7 %, an accuracy of 91.1 %, and a specificity of 84.9 %. Conclusion  CAD, using the three studied methods, showed good accuracy in the detection of polyps with white light colonoscopy. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2019-02 2019-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6338549/ /pubmed/30705955 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0808-4456 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Figueiredo, Pedro N.
Figueiredo, Isabel N.
Pinto, Luís
Kumar, Sunil
Tsai, Yen-Hsi Richard
Mamonov, Alexander V.
Polyp detection with computer-aided diagnosis in white light colonoscopy: comparison of three different methods
title Polyp detection with computer-aided diagnosis in white light colonoscopy: comparison of three different methods
title_full Polyp detection with computer-aided diagnosis in white light colonoscopy: comparison of three different methods
title_fullStr Polyp detection with computer-aided diagnosis in white light colonoscopy: comparison of three different methods
title_full_unstemmed Polyp detection with computer-aided diagnosis in white light colonoscopy: comparison of three different methods
title_short Polyp detection with computer-aided diagnosis in white light colonoscopy: comparison of three different methods
title_sort polyp detection with computer-aided diagnosis in white light colonoscopy: comparison of three different methods
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6338549/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30705955
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0808-4456
work_keys_str_mv AT figueiredopedron polypdetectionwithcomputeraideddiagnosisinwhitelightcolonoscopycomparisonofthreedifferentmethods
AT figueiredoisabeln polypdetectionwithcomputeraideddiagnosisinwhitelightcolonoscopycomparisonofthreedifferentmethods
AT pintoluis polypdetectionwithcomputeraideddiagnosisinwhitelightcolonoscopycomparisonofthreedifferentmethods
AT kumarsunil polypdetectionwithcomputeraideddiagnosisinwhitelightcolonoscopycomparisonofthreedifferentmethods
AT tsaiyenhsirichard polypdetectionwithcomputeraideddiagnosisinwhitelightcolonoscopycomparisonofthreedifferentmethods
AT mamonovalexanderv polypdetectionwithcomputeraideddiagnosisinwhitelightcolonoscopycomparisonofthreedifferentmethods