Cargando…
Radical prostatectomy performed via robotic, transperitoneal and extraperitoneoscopic approaches: functional and early oncological outcomes
INTRODUCTION: Oncological remission along with high postoperative functionality [continence and erectile function (EF)] are the main aspects of prostate cancer (PCa) treatment. The aim of this study was to compare functional and oncological treatment results achieved after a nerve-sparing radical pr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Polish Urological Association
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6338822/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30680229 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2018.1739 |
_version_ | 1783388502772154368 |
---|---|
author | Rapoport, Leonid Yossepowitch, Ofer Shpot, Evgeniy Chinenov, Denis Chernov, Yaroslav Yurova, Maria Enikeev, Dmitry |
author_facet | Rapoport, Leonid Yossepowitch, Ofer Shpot, Evgeniy Chinenov, Denis Chernov, Yaroslav Yurova, Maria Enikeev, Dmitry |
author_sort | Rapoport, Leonid |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Oncological remission along with high postoperative functionality [continence and erectile function (EF)] are the main aspects of prostate cancer (PCa) treatment. The aim of this study was to compare functional and oncological treatment results achieved after a nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy (RP) via transperitoneal (TPRP), extraperitoneal (EPRP) and robot-assisted (RARP) approach. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From March 2015 to March 2016, 507 RP were performed at the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health (Moscow, Russia). A total of 264 patients with localized (cТ1а–2с) prostate cancer [prostate-specific antigen (PSA) <20 ng/ml, Gleason score ≤7], intact prostate capsule (according to MRI), International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) ≥19 and a life expectancy >10 years were included into the retrospective study. All the surgeries were performed by a single surgeon. The outcomes were evaluated after urethral catheter removal and 3–6–12 months after RP. RESULTS: Nerve preservation (NP) was performed for 153 patients without significant distinctions in time (р = 0.064) and blood loss (р = 0.073). The International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-SF) score was lower for NP: 9.23 ±6.59 and 3.86 ±5.38 after 3 and 12 months respectively compared with continence after RP without nerve preservation (NP): 14.27 ±5.1 vs. 6.15 ±4.76 (р <0.001). Continent was 52.2% vs. 83.3% vs. 81.8% in TPRP, RARP and EPRP groups; р <0.001. IIEF-5 scores were 14.67 ±9.4, 4.2 ±4.26 and 4.0 ±2.07 after RARP, TPRP and EPRP respectively (р = 0.002). After 12 months the PSA: TPRP = 0.11 ±0.19, RARP = 0.03 ±0.05 and EPRP = 0.53 ±1.87 ng/ml (р <0.001). Outcomes depend on surgical approach and was better in the RARP-group (AUC = 0.768 ±0.034 (CI 95% 0,701–0.834; р <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We suggest RARP with NP as a method of choice for treatment of prostate cancer in patients interested in preservation of EF and quality of life in general. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6338822 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Polish Urological Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63388222019-01-24 Radical prostatectomy performed via robotic, transperitoneal and extraperitoneoscopic approaches: functional and early oncological outcomes Rapoport, Leonid Yossepowitch, Ofer Shpot, Evgeniy Chinenov, Denis Chernov, Yaroslav Yurova, Maria Enikeev, Dmitry Cent European J Urol Original Paper INTRODUCTION: Oncological remission along with high postoperative functionality [continence and erectile function (EF)] are the main aspects of prostate cancer (PCa) treatment. The aim of this study was to compare functional and oncological treatment results achieved after a nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy (RP) via transperitoneal (TPRP), extraperitoneal (EPRP) and robot-assisted (RARP) approach. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From March 2015 to March 2016, 507 RP were performed at the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health (Moscow, Russia). A total of 264 patients with localized (cТ1а–2с) prostate cancer [prostate-specific antigen (PSA) <20 ng/ml, Gleason score ≤7], intact prostate capsule (according to MRI), International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) ≥19 and a life expectancy >10 years were included into the retrospective study. All the surgeries were performed by a single surgeon. The outcomes were evaluated after urethral catheter removal and 3–6–12 months after RP. RESULTS: Nerve preservation (NP) was performed for 153 patients without significant distinctions in time (р = 0.064) and blood loss (р = 0.073). The International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-SF) score was lower for NP: 9.23 ±6.59 and 3.86 ±5.38 after 3 and 12 months respectively compared with continence after RP without nerve preservation (NP): 14.27 ±5.1 vs. 6.15 ±4.76 (р <0.001). Continent was 52.2% vs. 83.3% vs. 81.8% in TPRP, RARP and EPRP groups; р <0.001. IIEF-5 scores were 14.67 ±9.4, 4.2 ±4.26 and 4.0 ±2.07 after RARP, TPRP and EPRP respectively (р = 0.002). After 12 months the PSA: TPRP = 0.11 ±0.19, RARP = 0.03 ±0.05 and EPRP = 0.53 ±1.87 ng/ml (р <0.001). Outcomes depend on surgical approach and was better in the RARP-group (AUC = 0.768 ±0.034 (CI 95% 0,701–0.834; р <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We suggest RARP with NP as a method of choice for treatment of prostate cancer in patients interested in preservation of EF and quality of life in general. Polish Urological Association 2018-10-30 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6338822/ /pubmed/30680229 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2018.1739 Text en Copyright by Polish Urological Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Rapoport, Leonid Yossepowitch, Ofer Shpot, Evgeniy Chinenov, Denis Chernov, Yaroslav Yurova, Maria Enikeev, Dmitry Radical prostatectomy performed via robotic, transperitoneal and extraperitoneoscopic approaches: functional and early oncological outcomes |
title | Radical prostatectomy performed via robotic, transperitoneal and extraperitoneoscopic approaches: functional and early oncological outcomes |
title_full | Radical prostatectomy performed via robotic, transperitoneal and extraperitoneoscopic approaches: functional and early oncological outcomes |
title_fullStr | Radical prostatectomy performed via robotic, transperitoneal and extraperitoneoscopic approaches: functional and early oncological outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed | Radical prostatectomy performed via robotic, transperitoneal and extraperitoneoscopic approaches: functional and early oncological outcomes |
title_short | Radical prostatectomy performed via robotic, transperitoneal and extraperitoneoscopic approaches: functional and early oncological outcomes |
title_sort | radical prostatectomy performed via robotic, transperitoneal and extraperitoneoscopic approaches: functional and early oncological outcomes |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6338822/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30680229 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2018.1739 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rapoportleonid radicalprostatectomyperformedviarobotictransperitonealandextraperitoneoscopicapproachesfunctionalandearlyoncologicaloutcomes AT yossepowitchofer radicalprostatectomyperformedviarobotictransperitonealandextraperitoneoscopicapproachesfunctionalandearlyoncologicaloutcomes AT shpotevgeniy radicalprostatectomyperformedviarobotictransperitonealandextraperitoneoscopicapproachesfunctionalandearlyoncologicaloutcomes AT chinenovdenis radicalprostatectomyperformedviarobotictransperitonealandextraperitoneoscopicapproachesfunctionalandearlyoncologicaloutcomes AT chernovyaroslav radicalprostatectomyperformedviarobotictransperitonealandextraperitoneoscopicapproachesfunctionalandearlyoncologicaloutcomes AT yurovamaria radicalprostatectomyperformedviarobotictransperitonealandextraperitoneoscopicapproachesfunctionalandearlyoncologicaloutcomes AT enikeevdmitry radicalprostatectomyperformedviarobotictransperitonealandextraperitoneoscopicapproachesfunctionalandearlyoncologicaloutcomes |