Cargando…

Traditional Bullying and Discriminatory Bullying Around Special Educational Needs: Psychometric Properties of Two Instruments to Measure It

Two important challenges in research on bullying are to have reliable tools to measure traditional bullying and discriminatory bullying related to special educational needs (SEN), and to learn more about their prevalence. We present the validations of two instruments to measure bullying (European Bu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rodríguez-Hidalgo, Antonio J., Alcívar, Anabel, Herrera-López, Mauricio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6338959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30621091
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16010142
_version_ 1783388525731774464
author Rodríguez-Hidalgo, Antonio J.
Alcívar, Anabel
Herrera-López, Mauricio
author_facet Rodríguez-Hidalgo, Antonio J.
Alcívar, Anabel
Herrera-López, Mauricio
author_sort Rodríguez-Hidalgo, Antonio J.
collection PubMed
description Two important challenges in research on bullying are to have reliable tools to measure traditional bullying and discriminatory bullying related to special educational needs (SEN), and to learn more about their prevalence. We present the validations of two instruments to measure bullying (European Bullying Intervention Project Questionnaire, EBIPQ) and discriminatory bullying with respect to SEN (EBIPQ–Special Education Needs Discrimination version, henceforth EBIPQ-SEND). A total of 17,309 teenagers from Ecuador took part in the study (M = 14.76, SD = 1.65; 49.9% male). The item response theory analyses evidenced accuracy and quality of the measures. The confirmatory factor analyses of the EBIPQ and the EBIPQ-SEND revealed the same two-factor structure—aggression and victimization—regardless of gender, showing optimal fit indexes. We present the results of the prevalence according to the roles of participation in traditional bullying and discriminatory bullying around SEN. Significant gender and age differences were observed for involvement in both phenomena. We also discuss the advantages of applying the EBIPQ and the EBIPQ-SEND to evaluate and diagnose harassment and discriminatory harassment around SEN.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6338959
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63389592019-01-23 Traditional Bullying and Discriminatory Bullying Around Special Educational Needs: Psychometric Properties of Two Instruments to Measure It Rodríguez-Hidalgo, Antonio J. Alcívar, Anabel Herrera-López, Mauricio Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Two important challenges in research on bullying are to have reliable tools to measure traditional bullying and discriminatory bullying related to special educational needs (SEN), and to learn more about their prevalence. We present the validations of two instruments to measure bullying (European Bullying Intervention Project Questionnaire, EBIPQ) and discriminatory bullying with respect to SEN (EBIPQ–Special Education Needs Discrimination version, henceforth EBIPQ-SEND). A total of 17,309 teenagers from Ecuador took part in the study (M = 14.76, SD = 1.65; 49.9% male). The item response theory analyses evidenced accuracy and quality of the measures. The confirmatory factor analyses of the EBIPQ and the EBIPQ-SEND revealed the same two-factor structure—aggression and victimization—regardless of gender, showing optimal fit indexes. We present the results of the prevalence according to the roles of participation in traditional bullying and discriminatory bullying around SEN. Significant gender and age differences were observed for involvement in both phenomena. We also discuss the advantages of applying the EBIPQ and the EBIPQ-SEND to evaluate and diagnose harassment and discriminatory harassment around SEN. MDPI 2019-01-07 2019-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6338959/ /pubmed/30621091 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16010142 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Rodríguez-Hidalgo, Antonio J.
Alcívar, Anabel
Herrera-López, Mauricio
Traditional Bullying and Discriminatory Bullying Around Special Educational Needs: Psychometric Properties of Two Instruments to Measure It
title Traditional Bullying and Discriminatory Bullying Around Special Educational Needs: Psychometric Properties of Two Instruments to Measure It
title_full Traditional Bullying and Discriminatory Bullying Around Special Educational Needs: Psychometric Properties of Two Instruments to Measure It
title_fullStr Traditional Bullying and Discriminatory Bullying Around Special Educational Needs: Psychometric Properties of Two Instruments to Measure It
title_full_unstemmed Traditional Bullying and Discriminatory Bullying Around Special Educational Needs: Psychometric Properties of Two Instruments to Measure It
title_short Traditional Bullying and Discriminatory Bullying Around Special Educational Needs: Psychometric Properties of Two Instruments to Measure It
title_sort traditional bullying and discriminatory bullying around special educational needs: psychometric properties of two instruments to measure it
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6338959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30621091
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16010142
work_keys_str_mv AT rodriguezhidalgoantonioj traditionalbullyinganddiscriminatorybullyingaroundspecialeducationalneedspsychometricpropertiesoftwoinstrumentstomeasureit
AT alcivaranabel traditionalbullyinganddiscriminatorybullyingaroundspecialeducationalneedspsychometricpropertiesoftwoinstrumentstomeasureit
AT herreralopezmauricio traditionalbullyinganddiscriminatorybullyingaroundspecialeducationalneedspsychometricpropertiesoftwoinstrumentstomeasureit