Cargando…

Reliability and Agreement of 3D Trunk and Lower Extremity Movement Analysis by Means of Inertial Sensor Technology for Unipodal and Bipodal Tasks

This study evaluates the reliability and agreement of the 3D range of motion (ROM) of trunk and lower limb joints, measured by inertial measurement units (MVN BIOMECH Awinda, Xsens Technologies), during a single leg squat (SLS) and sit to stand (STS) task. Furthermore, distinction was made between m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van der Straaten, Rob, Bruijnes, Amber K. B. D., Vanwanseele, Benedicte, Jonkers, Ilse, De Baets, Liesbet, Timmermans, Annick
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6339112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30609808
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19010141
_version_ 1783388563108265984
author van der Straaten, Rob
Bruijnes, Amber K. B. D.
Vanwanseele, Benedicte
Jonkers, Ilse
De Baets, Liesbet
Timmermans, Annick
author_facet van der Straaten, Rob
Bruijnes, Amber K. B. D.
Vanwanseele, Benedicte
Jonkers, Ilse
De Baets, Liesbet
Timmermans, Annick
author_sort van der Straaten, Rob
collection PubMed
description This study evaluates the reliability and agreement of the 3D range of motion (ROM) of trunk and lower limb joints, measured by inertial measurement units (MVN BIOMECH Awinda, Xsens Technologies), during a single leg squat (SLS) and sit to stand (STS) task. Furthermore, distinction was made between movement phases, to discuss the reliability and agreement for different phases of both movement tasks. Twenty healthy participants were measured on two testing days. On day one, measurements were conducted by two operators to determine the within-session and between-operator reliability and agreement. On day two, measurements were conducted by the same operator, to determine the between-session reliability and agreement. The SLS task had lower within-session reliability and agreement compared with between-session and between-operator reliability and agreement. The reliability and agreement of the hip, knee, and ankle ROM in the sagittal plane were good for both phases of the SLS task. For both phases of STS task, within-session reliability and agreement were good, and between-session and between-operator reliability and agreement were lower in all planes. As both tasks are physically demanding, differences may be explained by inconsistent movement strategies. These results show that inertial sensor systems show promise for use in further research to investigate (mal)adaptive movement strategies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6339112
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63391122019-01-23 Reliability and Agreement of 3D Trunk and Lower Extremity Movement Analysis by Means of Inertial Sensor Technology for Unipodal and Bipodal Tasks van der Straaten, Rob Bruijnes, Amber K. B. D. Vanwanseele, Benedicte Jonkers, Ilse De Baets, Liesbet Timmermans, Annick Sensors (Basel) Article This study evaluates the reliability and agreement of the 3D range of motion (ROM) of trunk and lower limb joints, measured by inertial measurement units (MVN BIOMECH Awinda, Xsens Technologies), during a single leg squat (SLS) and sit to stand (STS) task. Furthermore, distinction was made between movement phases, to discuss the reliability and agreement for different phases of both movement tasks. Twenty healthy participants were measured on two testing days. On day one, measurements were conducted by two operators to determine the within-session and between-operator reliability and agreement. On day two, measurements were conducted by the same operator, to determine the between-session reliability and agreement. The SLS task had lower within-session reliability and agreement compared with between-session and between-operator reliability and agreement. The reliability and agreement of the hip, knee, and ankle ROM in the sagittal plane were good for both phases of the SLS task. For both phases of STS task, within-session reliability and agreement were good, and between-session and between-operator reliability and agreement were lower in all planes. As both tasks are physically demanding, differences may be explained by inconsistent movement strategies. These results show that inertial sensor systems show promise for use in further research to investigate (mal)adaptive movement strategies. MDPI 2019-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6339112/ /pubmed/30609808 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19010141 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
van der Straaten, Rob
Bruijnes, Amber K. B. D.
Vanwanseele, Benedicte
Jonkers, Ilse
De Baets, Liesbet
Timmermans, Annick
Reliability and Agreement of 3D Trunk and Lower Extremity Movement Analysis by Means of Inertial Sensor Technology for Unipodal and Bipodal Tasks
title Reliability and Agreement of 3D Trunk and Lower Extremity Movement Analysis by Means of Inertial Sensor Technology for Unipodal and Bipodal Tasks
title_full Reliability and Agreement of 3D Trunk and Lower Extremity Movement Analysis by Means of Inertial Sensor Technology for Unipodal and Bipodal Tasks
title_fullStr Reliability and Agreement of 3D Trunk and Lower Extremity Movement Analysis by Means of Inertial Sensor Technology for Unipodal and Bipodal Tasks
title_full_unstemmed Reliability and Agreement of 3D Trunk and Lower Extremity Movement Analysis by Means of Inertial Sensor Technology for Unipodal and Bipodal Tasks
title_short Reliability and Agreement of 3D Trunk and Lower Extremity Movement Analysis by Means of Inertial Sensor Technology for Unipodal and Bipodal Tasks
title_sort reliability and agreement of 3d trunk and lower extremity movement analysis by means of inertial sensor technology for unipodal and bipodal tasks
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6339112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30609808
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19010141
work_keys_str_mv AT vanderstraatenrob reliabilityandagreementof3dtrunkandlowerextremitymovementanalysisbymeansofinertialsensortechnologyforunipodalandbipodaltasks
AT bruijnesamberkbd reliabilityandagreementof3dtrunkandlowerextremitymovementanalysisbymeansofinertialsensortechnologyforunipodalandbipodaltasks
AT vanwanseelebenedicte reliabilityandagreementof3dtrunkandlowerextremitymovementanalysisbymeansofinertialsensortechnologyforunipodalandbipodaltasks
AT jonkersilse reliabilityandagreementof3dtrunkandlowerextremitymovementanalysisbymeansofinertialsensortechnologyforunipodalandbipodaltasks
AT debaetsliesbet reliabilityandagreementof3dtrunkandlowerextremitymovementanalysisbymeansofinertialsensortechnologyforunipodalandbipodaltasks
AT timmermansannick reliabilityandagreementof3dtrunkandlowerextremitymovementanalysisbymeansofinertialsensortechnologyforunipodalandbipodaltasks