Cargando…

Follow-up score, change score or percentage change score for determining clinical important outcome following surgery? An observational study from the Norwegian registry for Spine surgery evaluating patient reported outcome measures in lumbar spinal stenosis and lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis

BACKGROUND: Assessment of outcomes for spinal surgeries is challenging, and an ideal measurement that reflects all aspects of importance for the patients does not exist. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), EuroQol (EQ-5D) and Numeric Rating Scales (NRS) for leg pain and for back pain are commonly used...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Austevoll, Ivar Magne, Gjestad, Rolf, Grotle, Margreth, Solberg, Tore, Brox, Jens Ivar, Hermansen, Erland, Rekeland, Frode, Indrekvam, Kari, Storheim, Kjersti, Hellum, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6339296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30658613
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2386-y
_version_ 1783388605690937344
author Austevoll, Ivar Magne
Gjestad, Rolf
Grotle, Margreth
Solberg, Tore
Brox, Jens Ivar
Hermansen, Erland
Rekeland, Frode
Indrekvam, Kari
Storheim, Kjersti
Hellum, Christian
author_facet Austevoll, Ivar Magne
Gjestad, Rolf
Grotle, Margreth
Solberg, Tore
Brox, Jens Ivar
Hermansen, Erland
Rekeland, Frode
Indrekvam, Kari
Storheim, Kjersti
Hellum, Christian
author_sort Austevoll, Ivar Magne
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Assessment of outcomes for spinal surgeries is challenging, and an ideal measurement that reflects all aspects of importance for the patients does not exist. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), EuroQol (EQ-5D) and Numeric Rating Scales (NRS) for leg pain and for back pain are commonly used patients reported outcome measurements (PROMs). Reporting the proportion of individuals with an outcome of clinical importance is recommended. Knowledge of the ability of PROMs to identify clearly improved patients is essential. The purpose of this study was to search cut-off criteria for PROMs that best reflect an improvement considered by the patients to be of clinical importance. METHODS: The Global Perceived Effect scale was utilized to evaluate a clinically important outcome 12 months after surgery. The cut-offs for the PROMs that most accurately distinguish those who reported ‘completely recovered’ or ‘much improved’ from those who reported ‘slightly improved’, unchanged’, ‘slightly worse’, ‘much worse’, or ‘worse than ever’ were estimated. For each PROM, we evaluated three candidate response parameters: the (raw) follow-up score, the (numerical) change score, and the percentage change score. RESULTS: We analysed 3859 patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis [(LSS); mean age 66; female gender 50%] and 617 patients with Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis [(LDS); mean age 67; 72% female gender]. The accuracy of identifying ‘completely recovered’ and ‘much better’ patients was generally high, but lower for EQ-5D than for the other PROMs. For all PROMs the accuracy was lower for the change score than for the follow-up score and the percentage change score, especially among patients with low and high PROM scores at baseline. The optimal threshold for a clinically important outcome was ≤24 for ODI, ≥0.69 for EQ-5D, ≤3 for NRS leg pain, and ≤ 4 for NRS back pain, and, for the percentage change score, ≥30% for ODI, ≥40% for NRS leg pain, and ≥ 33% for NRS back pain. The estimated cut-offs were similar for LSS and for LDS. CONCLUSION: For estimating a ‘success’ rate assessed by a PROM, we recommend using the follow-up score or the percentage change score. These scores reflected a clinically important outcome better than the change score.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6339296
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63392962019-01-23 Follow-up score, change score or percentage change score for determining clinical important outcome following surgery? An observational study from the Norwegian registry for Spine surgery evaluating patient reported outcome measures in lumbar spinal stenosis and lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis Austevoll, Ivar Magne Gjestad, Rolf Grotle, Margreth Solberg, Tore Brox, Jens Ivar Hermansen, Erland Rekeland, Frode Indrekvam, Kari Storheim, Kjersti Hellum, Christian BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Assessment of outcomes for spinal surgeries is challenging, and an ideal measurement that reflects all aspects of importance for the patients does not exist. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), EuroQol (EQ-5D) and Numeric Rating Scales (NRS) for leg pain and for back pain are commonly used patients reported outcome measurements (PROMs). Reporting the proportion of individuals with an outcome of clinical importance is recommended. Knowledge of the ability of PROMs to identify clearly improved patients is essential. The purpose of this study was to search cut-off criteria for PROMs that best reflect an improvement considered by the patients to be of clinical importance. METHODS: The Global Perceived Effect scale was utilized to evaluate a clinically important outcome 12 months after surgery. The cut-offs for the PROMs that most accurately distinguish those who reported ‘completely recovered’ or ‘much improved’ from those who reported ‘slightly improved’, unchanged’, ‘slightly worse’, ‘much worse’, or ‘worse than ever’ were estimated. For each PROM, we evaluated three candidate response parameters: the (raw) follow-up score, the (numerical) change score, and the percentage change score. RESULTS: We analysed 3859 patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis [(LSS); mean age 66; female gender 50%] and 617 patients with Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis [(LDS); mean age 67; 72% female gender]. The accuracy of identifying ‘completely recovered’ and ‘much better’ patients was generally high, but lower for EQ-5D than for the other PROMs. For all PROMs the accuracy was lower for the change score than for the follow-up score and the percentage change score, especially among patients with low and high PROM scores at baseline. The optimal threshold for a clinically important outcome was ≤24 for ODI, ≥0.69 for EQ-5D, ≤3 for NRS leg pain, and ≤ 4 for NRS back pain, and, for the percentage change score, ≥30% for ODI, ≥40% for NRS leg pain, and ≥ 33% for NRS back pain. The estimated cut-offs were similar for LSS and for LDS. CONCLUSION: For estimating a ‘success’ rate assessed by a PROM, we recommend using the follow-up score or the percentage change score. These scores reflected a clinically important outcome better than the change score. BioMed Central 2019-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6339296/ /pubmed/30658613 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2386-y Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Austevoll, Ivar Magne
Gjestad, Rolf
Grotle, Margreth
Solberg, Tore
Brox, Jens Ivar
Hermansen, Erland
Rekeland, Frode
Indrekvam, Kari
Storheim, Kjersti
Hellum, Christian
Follow-up score, change score or percentage change score for determining clinical important outcome following surgery? An observational study from the Norwegian registry for Spine surgery evaluating patient reported outcome measures in lumbar spinal stenosis and lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis
title Follow-up score, change score or percentage change score for determining clinical important outcome following surgery? An observational study from the Norwegian registry for Spine surgery evaluating patient reported outcome measures in lumbar spinal stenosis and lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis
title_full Follow-up score, change score or percentage change score for determining clinical important outcome following surgery? An observational study from the Norwegian registry for Spine surgery evaluating patient reported outcome measures in lumbar spinal stenosis and lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis
title_fullStr Follow-up score, change score or percentage change score for determining clinical important outcome following surgery? An observational study from the Norwegian registry for Spine surgery evaluating patient reported outcome measures in lumbar spinal stenosis and lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis
title_full_unstemmed Follow-up score, change score or percentage change score for determining clinical important outcome following surgery? An observational study from the Norwegian registry for Spine surgery evaluating patient reported outcome measures in lumbar spinal stenosis and lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis
title_short Follow-up score, change score or percentage change score for determining clinical important outcome following surgery? An observational study from the Norwegian registry for Spine surgery evaluating patient reported outcome measures in lumbar spinal stenosis and lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis
title_sort follow-up score, change score or percentage change score for determining clinical important outcome following surgery? an observational study from the norwegian registry for spine surgery evaluating patient reported outcome measures in lumbar spinal stenosis and lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6339296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30658613
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2386-y
work_keys_str_mv AT austevollivarmagne followupscorechangescoreorpercentagechangescorefordeterminingclinicalimportantoutcomefollowingsurgeryanobservationalstudyfromthenorwegianregistryforspinesurgeryevaluatingpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinlumbarspinalstenosisandlumbardegenerativespondylolist
AT gjestadrolf followupscorechangescoreorpercentagechangescorefordeterminingclinicalimportantoutcomefollowingsurgeryanobservationalstudyfromthenorwegianregistryforspinesurgeryevaluatingpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinlumbarspinalstenosisandlumbardegenerativespondylolist
AT grotlemargreth followupscorechangescoreorpercentagechangescorefordeterminingclinicalimportantoutcomefollowingsurgeryanobservationalstudyfromthenorwegianregistryforspinesurgeryevaluatingpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinlumbarspinalstenosisandlumbardegenerativespondylolist
AT solbergtore followupscorechangescoreorpercentagechangescorefordeterminingclinicalimportantoutcomefollowingsurgeryanobservationalstudyfromthenorwegianregistryforspinesurgeryevaluatingpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinlumbarspinalstenosisandlumbardegenerativespondylolist
AT broxjensivar followupscorechangescoreorpercentagechangescorefordeterminingclinicalimportantoutcomefollowingsurgeryanobservationalstudyfromthenorwegianregistryforspinesurgeryevaluatingpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinlumbarspinalstenosisandlumbardegenerativespondylolist
AT hermansenerland followupscorechangescoreorpercentagechangescorefordeterminingclinicalimportantoutcomefollowingsurgeryanobservationalstudyfromthenorwegianregistryforspinesurgeryevaluatingpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinlumbarspinalstenosisandlumbardegenerativespondylolist
AT rekelandfrode followupscorechangescoreorpercentagechangescorefordeterminingclinicalimportantoutcomefollowingsurgeryanobservationalstudyfromthenorwegianregistryforspinesurgeryevaluatingpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinlumbarspinalstenosisandlumbardegenerativespondylolist
AT indrekvamkari followupscorechangescoreorpercentagechangescorefordeterminingclinicalimportantoutcomefollowingsurgeryanobservationalstudyfromthenorwegianregistryforspinesurgeryevaluatingpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinlumbarspinalstenosisandlumbardegenerativespondylolist
AT storheimkjersti followupscorechangescoreorpercentagechangescorefordeterminingclinicalimportantoutcomefollowingsurgeryanobservationalstudyfromthenorwegianregistryforspinesurgeryevaluatingpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinlumbarspinalstenosisandlumbardegenerativespondylolist
AT hellumchristian followupscorechangescoreorpercentagechangescorefordeterminingclinicalimportantoutcomefollowingsurgeryanobservationalstudyfromthenorwegianregistryforspinesurgeryevaluatingpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinlumbarspinalstenosisandlumbardegenerativespondylolist