Cargando…

A critical analysis of purchasing arrangements in Kenya: the case of micro health insurance

BACKGROUND: Strategic purchasing can ensure that financial resources are used in a way that optimally enhances the attainment of health system goals. A number of low- and middle-income countries, including Kenya, have experimented with micro health insurance (MHIs) as a means to purchase health serv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Munge, Kenneth, Mulupi, Stephen, Barasa, Edwine, Chuma, Jane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6339322/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30658639
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3863-6
_version_ 1783388611857612800
author Munge, Kenneth
Mulupi, Stephen
Barasa, Edwine
Chuma, Jane
author_facet Munge, Kenneth
Mulupi, Stephen
Barasa, Edwine
Chuma, Jane
author_sort Munge, Kenneth
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Strategic purchasing can ensure that financial resources are used in a way that optimally enhances the attainment of health system goals. A number of low- and middle-income countries, including Kenya, have experimented with micro health insurance (MHIs) as a means to purchase health services for the informal sector. This study aimed to examine the purchasing practices of MHIs in Kenya. METHODS: The study was guided by an analytical framework that compared purchasing practices of MHIs with the ideal actions for strategic purchasing along three pairs of principal-agent relationships (government-purchaser, purchaser-provider and citizen-purchaser). The study adopted a qualitative descriptive case study design with 2 MHIs as cases. Data were collected through document reviews (regulation, marketing materials, websites) and semi-structured interviews with key informants (n = 27). RESULTS: The regulatory framework for MHIs did not adequately support strategic purchasing practice and was exacerbated by poor coordination between health and financial sectors. The MHIs strategically contracted health providers over whom they could exercise bargaining power, sometimes at the expense of quality. There were no clear channels for beneficiaries to provide timely feedback to the purchaser. MHIs premium payments were family-based, low-cost and offered limited benefits. Coverage was based on ability to pay, which may have excluded low-income households from membership. CONCLUSIONS: Adequate policy, legal and regulatory frameworks that integrate MHIs into the broader health financing system and support strategic purchasing practices are required. The state departments responsible for finance and health should form coordinating structures that ensure that MHI’s role in universal health coverage is owned across all relevant sectors, and that actors, such as regulators, perform in a coordinated manner. The frameworks should also seek to align purchasers’ relationships with providers so that clear and consistent signals are received by providers from all purchasing mechanisms present within the health system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6339322
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63393222019-01-23 A critical analysis of purchasing arrangements in Kenya: the case of micro health insurance Munge, Kenneth Mulupi, Stephen Barasa, Edwine Chuma, Jane BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Strategic purchasing can ensure that financial resources are used in a way that optimally enhances the attainment of health system goals. A number of low- and middle-income countries, including Kenya, have experimented with micro health insurance (MHIs) as a means to purchase health services for the informal sector. This study aimed to examine the purchasing practices of MHIs in Kenya. METHODS: The study was guided by an analytical framework that compared purchasing practices of MHIs with the ideal actions for strategic purchasing along three pairs of principal-agent relationships (government-purchaser, purchaser-provider and citizen-purchaser). The study adopted a qualitative descriptive case study design with 2 MHIs as cases. Data were collected through document reviews (regulation, marketing materials, websites) and semi-structured interviews with key informants (n = 27). RESULTS: The regulatory framework for MHIs did not adequately support strategic purchasing practice and was exacerbated by poor coordination between health and financial sectors. The MHIs strategically contracted health providers over whom they could exercise bargaining power, sometimes at the expense of quality. There were no clear channels for beneficiaries to provide timely feedback to the purchaser. MHIs premium payments were family-based, low-cost and offered limited benefits. Coverage was based on ability to pay, which may have excluded low-income households from membership. CONCLUSIONS: Adequate policy, legal and regulatory frameworks that integrate MHIs into the broader health financing system and support strategic purchasing practices are required. The state departments responsible for finance and health should form coordinating structures that ensure that MHI’s role in universal health coverage is owned across all relevant sectors, and that actors, such as regulators, perform in a coordinated manner. The frameworks should also seek to align purchasers’ relationships with providers so that clear and consistent signals are received by providers from all purchasing mechanisms present within the health system. BioMed Central 2019-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6339322/ /pubmed/30658639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3863-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Munge, Kenneth
Mulupi, Stephen
Barasa, Edwine
Chuma, Jane
A critical analysis of purchasing arrangements in Kenya: the case of micro health insurance
title A critical analysis of purchasing arrangements in Kenya: the case of micro health insurance
title_full A critical analysis of purchasing arrangements in Kenya: the case of micro health insurance
title_fullStr A critical analysis of purchasing arrangements in Kenya: the case of micro health insurance
title_full_unstemmed A critical analysis of purchasing arrangements in Kenya: the case of micro health insurance
title_short A critical analysis of purchasing arrangements in Kenya: the case of micro health insurance
title_sort critical analysis of purchasing arrangements in kenya: the case of micro health insurance
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6339322/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30658639
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3863-6
work_keys_str_mv AT mungekenneth acriticalanalysisofpurchasingarrangementsinkenyathecaseofmicrohealthinsurance
AT mulupistephen acriticalanalysisofpurchasingarrangementsinkenyathecaseofmicrohealthinsurance
AT barasaedwine acriticalanalysisofpurchasingarrangementsinkenyathecaseofmicrohealthinsurance
AT chumajane acriticalanalysisofpurchasingarrangementsinkenyathecaseofmicrohealthinsurance
AT mungekenneth criticalanalysisofpurchasingarrangementsinkenyathecaseofmicrohealthinsurance
AT mulupistephen criticalanalysisofpurchasingarrangementsinkenyathecaseofmicrohealthinsurance
AT barasaedwine criticalanalysisofpurchasingarrangementsinkenyathecaseofmicrohealthinsurance
AT chumajane criticalanalysisofpurchasingarrangementsinkenyathecaseofmicrohealthinsurance