Cargando…
A low-birth-weight risk assessment scale: development and validation through a questionnaire-based survey
BACKGROUND: Birth weight is continuously decreasing in Japan since food satiation has become a problem in recent years. The present study aimed to develop and examine the reliability and validity of a scale for the assessment of risk factors for low birth weight in infants born at term. METHODS: A s...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6339392/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30658651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-3886-7 |
_version_ | 1783388628341227520 |
---|---|
author | Sonoda, Kazuko Matsunari, Yuko Takei, Syuji |
author_facet | Sonoda, Kazuko Matsunari, Yuko Takei, Syuji |
author_sort | Sonoda, Kazuko |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Birth weight is continuously decreasing in Japan since food satiation has become a problem in recent years. The present study aimed to develop and examine the reliability and validity of a scale for the assessment of risk factors for low birth weight in infants born at term. METHODS: A self-administered postal questionnaire survey comprising a low birth weight risk assessment scale was conducted on mothers with children of nursery school or kindergarten age. After item analysis (scale), factor structure was confirmed by an exploratory factor analysis using the main factor method promax rotation. The reliability of this scale was confirmed by Cronbach’s α coefficient and Item–Total correlation. The validity was confirmed by known-groups validity and internal validity. RESULTS: The responses of 630 mothers (valid response rate, 18.5%) were analyzed. Factor analysis (principal factor analysis and promax rotation) obtained an optimal scale comprising 25 items in the following nine factors: “guidance at each checkup,” “adequate rest,” “support from husband,” “effects on the fetus,” “support from society,” “support from family,” “effects of minor troubles,” “good lifestyle habits,” and “fall risk and lifestyle changes.” The overall Cronbach’s α coefficient for the scale was 0.701. Known-groups validity examination revealed significant differences in scale scores of birth weight, birth history, and maternal smoking status. CONCLUSION: The scale demonstrated internal consistency, construct validity, and known-groups validity, indicating that it can be used as an indicator of low birth weight risk. In the future, this scale may be included in medical questionnaires as part of health guidance for pregnant women at a risk of delivering low birth weight children. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-019-3886-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6339392 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63393922019-01-23 A low-birth-weight risk assessment scale: development and validation through a questionnaire-based survey Sonoda, Kazuko Matsunari, Yuko Takei, Syuji BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Birth weight is continuously decreasing in Japan since food satiation has become a problem in recent years. The present study aimed to develop and examine the reliability and validity of a scale for the assessment of risk factors for low birth weight in infants born at term. METHODS: A self-administered postal questionnaire survey comprising a low birth weight risk assessment scale was conducted on mothers with children of nursery school or kindergarten age. After item analysis (scale), factor structure was confirmed by an exploratory factor analysis using the main factor method promax rotation. The reliability of this scale was confirmed by Cronbach’s α coefficient and Item–Total correlation. The validity was confirmed by known-groups validity and internal validity. RESULTS: The responses of 630 mothers (valid response rate, 18.5%) were analyzed. Factor analysis (principal factor analysis and promax rotation) obtained an optimal scale comprising 25 items in the following nine factors: “guidance at each checkup,” “adequate rest,” “support from husband,” “effects on the fetus,” “support from society,” “support from family,” “effects of minor troubles,” “good lifestyle habits,” and “fall risk and lifestyle changes.” The overall Cronbach’s α coefficient for the scale was 0.701. Known-groups validity examination revealed significant differences in scale scores of birth weight, birth history, and maternal smoking status. CONCLUSION: The scale demonstrated internal consistency, construct validity, and known-groups validity, indicating that it can be used as an indicator of low birth weight risk. In the future, this scale may be included in medical questionnaires as part of health guidance for pregnant women at a risk of delivering low birth weight children. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-019-3886-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6339392/ /pubmed/30658651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-3886-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Sonoda, Kazuko Matsunari, Yuko Takei, Syuji A low-birth-weight risk assessment scale: development and validation through a questionnaire-based survey |
title | A low-birth-weight risk assessment scale: development and validation through a questionnaire-based survey |
title_full | A low-birth-weight risk assessment scale: development and validation through a questionnaire-based survey |
title_fullStr | A low-birth-weight risk assessment scale: development and validation through a questionnaire-based survey |
title_full_unstemmed | A low-birth-weight risk assessment scale: development and validation through a questionnaire-based survey |
title_short | A low-birth-weight risk assessment scale: development and validation through a questionnaire-based survey |
title_sort | low-birth-weight risk assessment scale: development and validation through a questionnaire-based survey |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6339392/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30658651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-3886-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sonodakazuko alowbirthweightriskassessmentscaledevelopmentandvalidationthroughaquestionnairebasedsurvey AT matsunariyuko alowbirthweightriskassessmentscaledevelopmentandvalidationthroughaquestionnairebasedsurvey AT takeisyuji alowbirthweightriskassessmentscaledevelopmentandvalidationthroughaquestionnairebasedsurvey AT sonodakazuko lowbirthweightriskassessmentscaledevelopmentandvalidationthroughaquestionnairebasedsurvey AT matsunariyuko lowbirthweightriskassessmentscaledevelopmentandvalidationthroughaquestionnairebasedsurvey AT takeisyuji lowbirthweightriskassessmentscaledevelopmentandvalidationthroughaquestionnairebasedsurvey |