Cargando…

Development of a cardiac-centered frailty ontology

BACKGROUND: A Cardiac-centered Frailty Ontology can be an important foundation for using NLP to assess patient frailty. Frailty is an important consideration when making patient treatment decisions, particularly in older adults, those with a cardiac diagnosis, or when major surgery is a consideratio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Doing-Harris, Kristina, Bray, Bruce E., Thackeray, Anne, Shah, Rashmee U., Shao, Yijun, Cheng, Yan, Zeng-Treitler, Qing, Garvin, Jennifer H., Weir, Charlene
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6339414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30658684
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13326-019-0195-3
_version_ 1783388633576767488
author Doing-Harris, Kristina
Bray, Bruce E.
Thackeray, Anne
Shah, Rashmee U.
Shao, Yijun
Cheng, Yan
Zeng-Treitler, Qing
Garvin, Jennifer H.
Weir, Charlene
author_facet Doing-Harris, Kristina
Bray, Bruce E.
Thackeray, Anne
Shah, Rashmee U.
Shao, Yijun
Cheng, Yan
Zeng-Treitler, Qing
Garvin, Jennifer H.
Weir, Charlene
author_sort Doing-Harris, Kristina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A Cardiac-centered Frailty Ontology can be an important foundation for using NLP to assess patient frailty. Frailty is an important consideration when making patient treatment decisions, particularly in older adults, those with a cardiac diagnosis, or when major surgery is a consideration. Clinicians often report patient’s frailty in progress notes and other documentation. Frailty is recorded in many different ways in patient records and many different validated frailty-measuring instruments are available, with little consistency across instruments. We specifically explored concepts relevant to decisions regarding cardiac interventions. We based our work on text found in a large corpus of clinical notes from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) national Electronic Health Record (EHR) database. RESULTS: The full ontology has 156 concepts, with 246 terms. It includes 86 concepts we expect to find in clinical documents, with 12 qualifier values. The remaining 58 concepts represent hierarchical groups (e.g., physical function findings). Our top-level class is clinical finding, which has children clinical history finding, instrument finding, and physical examination finding, reflecting the OGMS definition of clinical finding. Instrument finding is any score found for the existing frailty instruments. Within our ontology, we used SNOMED-CT concepts where possible. Some of the 86 concepts we expect to find in clinical documents are associated with the properties like ability interpretation. The concept ability to walk can either be able, assisted or unable. Each concept-property level pairing gets a different frailty score. Each scored concept received three scores: a frailty score, a relevance to cardiac decisions score, and a likelihood of resolving after the recommended intervention score. The ontology includes the relationship between scores from ten frailty instruments and frailty as assessed using ontology concepts. It also included rules for mapping ontology elements to instrument items for three common frailty assessment instruments. Ontology elements are used in two clinical NLP systems. CONCLUSIONS: We developed and validated a Cardiac-centered Frailty Ontology, which is a machine-interoperable description of frailty that reflects all the areas that clinicians consider when deciding which cardiac intervention will best serve the patient as well as frailty indications generally relevant to medical decisions. The ontology owl file is available on Bioportal at http://bioportal.bioontology.org/ontologies/CCFO. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13326-019-0195-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6339414
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63394142019-01-23 Development of a cardiac-centered frailty ontology Doing-Harris, Kristina Bray, Bruce E. Thackeray, Anne Shah, Rashmee U. Shao, Yijun Cheng, Yan Zeng-Treitler, Qing Garvin, Jennifer H. Weir, Charlene J Biomed Semantics Research BACKGROUND: A Cardiac-centered Frailty Ontology can be an important foundation for using NLP to assess patient frailty. Frailty is an important consideration when making patient treatment decisions, particularly in older adults, those with a cardiac diagnosis, or when major surgery is a consideration. Clinicians often report patient’s frailty in progress notes and other documentation. Frailty is recorded in many different ways in patient records and many different validated frailty-measuring instruments are available, with little consistency across instruments. We specifically explored concepts relevant to decisions regarding cardiac interventions. We based our work on text found in a large corpus of clinical notes from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) national Electronic Health Record (EHR) database. RESULTS: The full ontology has 156 concepts, with 246 terms. It includes 86 concepts we expect to find in clinical documents, with 12 qualifier values. The remaining 58 concepts represent hierarchical groups (e.g., physical function findings). Our top-level class is clinical finding, which has children clinical history finding, instrument finding, and physical examination finding, reflecting the OGMS definition of clinical finding. Instrument finding is any score found for the existing frailty instruments. Within our ontology, we used SNOMED-CT concepts where possible. Some of the 86 concepts we expect to find in clinical documents are associated with the properties like ability interpretation. The concept ability to walk can either be able, assisted or unable. Each concept-property level pairing gets a different frailty score. Each scored concept received three scores: a frailty score, a relevance to cardiac decisions score, and a likelihood of resolving after the recommended intervention score. The ontology includes the relationship between scores from ten frailty instruments and frailty as assessed using ontology concepts. It also included rules for mapping ontology elements to instrument items for three common frailty assessment instruments. Ontology elements are used in two clinical NLP systems. CONCLUSIONS: We developed and validated a Cardiac-centered Frailty Ontology, which is a machine-interoperable description of frailty that reflects all the areas that clinicians consider when deciding which cardiac intervention will best serve the patient as well as frailty indications generally relevant to medical decisions. The ontology owl file is available on Bioportal at http://bioportal.bioontology.org/ontologies/CCFO. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13326-019-0195-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6339414/ /pubmed/30658684 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13326-019-0195-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Doing-Harris, Kristina
Bray, Bruce E.
Thackeray, Anne
Shah, Rashmee U.
Shao, Yijun
Cheng, Yan
Zeng-Treitler, Qing
Garvin, Jennifer H.
Weir, Charlene
Development of a cardiac-centered frailty ontology
title Development of a cardiac-centered frailty ontology
title_full Development of a cardiac-centered frailty ontology
title_fullStr Development of a cardiac-centered frailty ontology
title_full_unstemmed Development of a cardiac-centered frailty ontology
title_short Development of a cardiac-centered frailty ontology
title_sort development of a cardiac-centered frailty ontology
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6339414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30658684
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13326-019-0195-3
work_keys_str_mv AT doingharriskristina developmentofacardiaccenteredfrailtyontology
AT braybrucee developmentofacardiaccenteredfrailtyontology
AT thackerayanne developmentofacardiaccenteredfrailtyontology
AT shahrashmeeu developmentofacardiaccenteredfrailtyontology
AT shaoyijun developmentofacardiaccenteredfrailtyontology
AT chengyan developmentofacardiaccenteredfrailtyontology
AT zengtreitlerqing developmentofacardiaccenteredfrailtyontology
AT garvinjenniferh developmentofacardiaccenteredfrailtyontology
AT weircharlene developmentofacardiaccenteredfrailtyontology