Cargando…

Proteomic analysis reveals response of differential wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes to oxygen deficiency stress

BACKGROUND: Waterlogging is one of the main abiotic stresses that limit wheat production. Quantitative proteomics analysis has been applied in the study of crop abiotic stress as an effective way in recent years (e.g. salt stress, drought stress, heat stress and waterlogging stress). However, only a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pan, Rui, He, Dongli, Xu, Le, Zhou, Meixue, Li, Chengdao, Wu, Chu, Xu, Yanhao, Zhang, Wenying
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6339445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30658567
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-018-5405-3
_version_ 1783388640839204864
author Pan, Rui
He, Dongli
Xu, Le
Zhou, Meixue
Li, Chengdao
Wu, Chu
Xu, Yanhao
Zhang, Wenying
author_facet Pan, Rui
He, Dongli
Xu, Le
Zhou, Meixue
Li, Chengdao
Wu, Chu
Xu, Yanhao
Zhang, Wenying
author_sort Pan, Rui
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Waterlogging is one of the main abiotic stresses that limit wheat production. Quantitative proteomics analysis has been applied in the study of crop abiotic stress as an effective way in recent years (e.g. salt stress, drought stress, heat stress and waterlogging stress). However, only a few proteins related to primary metabolism and signal transduction, such as UDP - glucose dehydrogenase, UGP, beta glucosidases, were reported to response to waterlogging stress in wheat. The differentially expressed proteins between genotypes of wheat in response to waterlogging are less-defined. In this study, two wheat genotypes, one is sensitive to waterlogging stress (Seri M82, named as S) and the other is tolerant to waterlogging (CIGM90.863, named as T), were compared in seedling roots under hypoxia conditions to evaluate the different responses at proteomic level. RESULTS: A total of 4560 proteins were identified and the number of differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) were 361, 640, 788 in S and 33, 207, 279 in T in 1, 2, 3 days, respectively. These DEPs included 270 common proteins, 681 S-specific and 50 T-specific proteins, most of which were misc., protein processing, DNA and RNA processing, amino acid metabolism and stress related proteins induced by hypoxia. Some specific proteins related to waterlogging stress, including acid phosphatase, oxidant protective enzyme, S-adenosylmethionine synthetase 1, were significantly different between S and T. A total of 20 representative genes encoding DEPs, including 7 shared DEPs and 13 cultivar-specific DEPs, were selected for further RT-qPCR analysis. Fourteen genes showed consistent dynamic expression patterns at mRNA and protein levels. CONCLUSIONS: Proteins involved in primary metabolisms and protein processing were inclined to be affected under hypoxia stress. The negative effects were more severe in the sensitive genotype. The expression patterns of some specific proteins, such as alcohol dehydrogenases and S-adenosylmethionine synthetase 1, could be applied as indexes for improving the waterlogging tolerance in wheat. Some specific proteins identified in this study will facilitate the subsequent protein function validation and biomarker development. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12864-018-5405-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6339445
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63394452019-01-23 Proteomic analysis reveals response of differential wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes to oxygen deficiency stress Pan, Rui He, Dongli Xu, Le Zhou, Meixue Li, Chengdao Wu, Chu Xu, Yanhao Zhang, Wenying BMC Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: Waterlogging is one of the main abiotic stresses that limit wheat production. Quantitative proteomics analysis has been applied in the study of crop abiotic stress as an effective way in recent years (e.g. salt stress, drought stress, heat stress and waterlogging stress). However, only a few proteins related to primary metabolism and signal transduction, such as UDP - glucose dehydrogenase, UGP, beta glucosidases, were reported to response to waterlogging stress in wheat. The differentially expressed proteins between genotypes of wheat in response to waterlogging are less-defined. In this study, two wheat genotypes, one is sensitive to waterlogging stress (Seri M82, named as S) and the other is tolerant to waterlogging (CIGM90.863, named as T), were compared in seedling roots under hypoxia conditions to evaluate the different responses at proteomic level. RESULTS: A total of 4560 proteins were identified and the number of differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) were 361, 640, 788 in S and 33, 207, 279 in T in 1, 2, 3 days, respectively. These DEPs included 270 common proteins, 681 S-specific and 50 T-specific proteins, most of which were misc., protein processing, DNA and RNA processing, amino acid metabolism and stress related proteins induced by hypoxia. Some specific proteins related to waterlogging stress, including acid phosphatase, oxidant protective enzyme, S-adenosylmethionine synthetase 1, were significantly different between S and T. A total of 20 representative genes encoding DEPs, including 7 shared DEPs and 13 cultivar-specific DEPs, were selected for further RT-qPCR analysis. Fourteen genes showed consistent dynamic expression patterns at mRNA and protein levels. CONCLUSIONS: Proteins involved in primary metabolisms and protein processing were inclined to be affected under hypoxia stress. The negative effects were more severe in the sensitive genotype. The expression patterns of some specific proteins, such as alcohol dehydrogenases and S-adenosylmethionine synthetase 1, could be applied as indexes for improving the waterlogging tolerance in wheat. Some specific proteins identified in this study will facilitate the subsequent protein function validation and biomarker development. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12864-018-5405-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6339445/ /pubmed/30658567 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-018-5405-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pan, Rui
He, Dongli
Xu, Le
Zhou, Meixue
Li, Chengdao
Wu, Chu
Xu, Yanhao
Zhang, Wenying
Proteomic analysis reveals response of differential wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes to oxygen deficiency stress
title Proteomic analysis reveals response of differential wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes to oxygen deficiency stress
title_full Proteomic analysis reveals response of differential wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes to oxygen deficiency stress
title_fullStr Proteomic analysis reveals response of differential wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes to oxygen deficiency stress
title_full_unstemmed Proteomic analysis reveals response of differential wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes to oxygen deficiency stress
title_short Proteomic analysis reveals response of differential wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes to oxygen deficiency stress
title_sort proteomic analysis reveals response of differential wheat (triticum aestivum l.) genotypes to oxygen deficiency stress
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6339445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30658567
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-018-5405-3
work_keys_str_mv AT panrui proteomicanalysisrevealsresponseofdifferentialwheattriticumaestivumlgenotypestooxygendeficiencystress
AT hedongli proteomicanalysisrevealsresponseofdifferentialwheattriticumaestivumlgenotypestooxygendeficiencystress
AT xule proteomicanalysisrevealsresponseofdifferentialwheattriticumaestivumlgenotypestooxygendeficiencystress
AT zhoumeixue proteomicanalysisrevealsresponseofdifferentialwheattriticumaestivumlgenotypestooxygendeficiencystress
AT lichengdao proteomicanalysisrevealsresponseofdifferentialwheattriticumaestivumlgenotypestooxygendeficiencystress
AT wuchu proteomicanalysisrevealsresponseofdifferentialwheattriticumaestivumlgenotypestooxygendeficiencystress
AT xuyanhao proteomicanalysisrevealsresponseofdifferentialwheattriticumaestivumlgenotypestooxygendeficiencystress
AT zhangwenying proteomicanalysisrevealsresponseofdifferentialwheattriticumaestivumlgenotypestooxygendeficiencystress