Cargando…

The Evaluation of Error Types and Turnaround Time of Preanalytical Phase in Biochemistry and Hematology Laboratories

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Each laboratory should determine the type of errors and turnaround time (TAT), especially in the preanalytical phase to report quality and timeliness of the test results. The current study aimed at investigating the common causes of preanalytical errors in biochemistry an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Cakirca, Gokhan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Iranian Society of Pathology 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6339495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30697287
_version_ 1783388650553212928
author Cakirca, Gokhan
author_facet Cakirca, Gokhan
author_sort Cakirca, Gokhan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Each laboratory should determine the type of errors and turnaround time (TAT), especially in the preanalytical phase to report quality and timeliness of the test results. The current study aimed at investigating the common causes of preanalytical errors in biochemistry and hematology laboratories and evaluating the preanalytical TAT for outpatient samples. METHODS: Data of rejected samples in the laboratory information system from September 2014 to September 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Also, the preanalytical TAT of the outpatient samples was evaluated over the period of three months from June to August 2015. Preanalytical TAT was calculated from order entry to barcode scanning in the autoanalyzer. RESULTS: With respect to the ratios of blood sample transfers, 1% of samples (2305 out of 225,563) in the hematology laboratory and 0.6% (1467 out of 255,943) in the biochemistry laboratory were rejected. The most common cause of rejection in the hematology and biochemistry laboratories was insufficient volume (48.8%) and hemolyzed sample (74.1%), respectively. The average preanalytical TAT for the outpatient samples was 62.3 minutes.The preanalytical TAT accounted for 10.8% (order entry-sample collection), 49% (sample collection-sample receipt), and 40.2% (sample receipt-barcode scanning in the autoanalyzer), respectively. CONCLUSION: Of all the samples received in the biochemistry and hematology laboratories, the overall percentage of rejections were 0.6% and 1%, respectively. The main target to improve preanalytical TAT was determined as the transportation (sample collection-sample receipt) step.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6339495
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Iranian Society of Pathology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63394952019-01-29 The Evaluation of Error Types and Turnaround Time of Preanalytical Phase in Biochemistry and Hematology Laboratories Cakirca, Gokhan Iran J Pathol Original Article BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Each laboratory should determine the type of errors and turnaround time (TAT), especially in the preanalytical phase to report quality and timeliness of the test results. The current study aimed at investigating the common causes of preanalytical errors in biochemistry and hematology laboratories and evaluating the preanalytical TAT for outpatient samples. METHODS: Data of rejected samples in the laboratory information system from September 2014 to September 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Also, the preanalytical TAT of the outpatient samples was evaluated over the period of three months from June to August 2015. Preanalytical TAT was calculated from order entry to barcode scanning in the autoanalyzer. RESULTS: With respect to the ratios of blood sample transfers, 1% of samples (2305 out of 225,563) in the hematology laboratory and 0.6% (1467 out of 255,943) in the biochemistry laboratory were rejected. The most common cause of rejection in the hematology and biochemistry laboratories was insufficient volume (48.8%) and hemolyzed sample (74.1%), respectively. The average preanalytical TAT for the outpatient samples was 62.3 minutes.The preanalytical TAT accounted for 10.8% (order entry-sample collection), 49% (sample collection-sample receipt), and 40.2% (sample receipt-barcode scanning in the autoanalyzer), respectively. CONCLUSION: Of all the samples received in the biochemistry and hematology laboratories, the overall percentage of rejections were 0.6% and 1%, respectively. The main target to improve preanalytical TAT was determined as the transportation (sample collection-sample receipt) step. Iranian Society of Pathology 2018 2018-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6339495/ /pubmed/30697287 Text en © 2018, IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-noncommercial 4.0 International License, (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Cakirca, Gokhan
The Evaluation of Error Types and Turnaround Time of Preanalytical Phase in Biochemistry and Hematology Laboratories
title The Evaluation of Error Types and Turnaround Time of Preanalytical Phase in Biochemistry and Hematology Laboratories
title_full The Evaluation of Error Types and Turnaround Time of Preanalytical Phase in Biochemistry and Hematology Laboratories
title_fullStr The Evaluation of Error Types and Turnaround Time of Preanalytical Phase in Biochemistry and Hematology Laboratories
title_full_unstemmed The Evaluation of Error Types and Turnaround Time of Preanalytical Phase in Biochemistry and Hematology Laboratories
title_short The Evaluation of Error Types and Turnaround Time of Preanalytical Phase in Biochemistry and Hematology Laboratories
title_sort evaluation of error types and turnaround time of preanalytical phase in biochemistry and hematology laboratories
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6339495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30697287
work_keys_str_mv AT cakircagokhan theevaluationoferrortypesandturnaroundtimeofpreanalyticalphaseinbiochemistryandhematologylaboratories
AT cakircagokhan evaluationoferrortypesandturnaroundtimeofpreanalyticalphaseinbiochemistryandhematologylaboratories