Cargando…

A Randomized Crossover Pilot Study of Telemedicine Delivered via iPads in Parkinson's Disease

BACKGROUND: We investigated the feasibility and safety of a video-based telemedicine system, delivered via a tablet, in Parkinson's disease (PD). METHODS: In a randomized, crossover, open-label pilot trial, we compared a telemedicine period (regular visits every two months with intermediate vid...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sekimoto, Satoko, Oyama, Genko, Hatano, Taku, Sasaki, Fuyuko, Nakamura, Ryota, Jo, Takayuki, Shimo, Yasushi, Hattori, Nobutaka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6339724/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30723541
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/9403295
_version_ 1783388677909512192
author Sekimoto, Satoko
Oyama, Genko
Hatano, Taku
Sasaki, Fuyuko
Nakamura, Ryota
Jo, Takayuki
Shimo, Yasushi
Hattori, Nobutaka
author_facet Sekimoto, Satoko
Oyama, Genko
Hatano, Taku
Sasaki, Fuyuko
Nakamura, Ryota
Jo, Takayuki
Shimo, Yasushi
Hattori, Nobutaka
author_sort Sekimoto, Satoko
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We investigated the feasibility and safety of a video-based telemedicine system, delivered via a tablet, in Parkinson's disease (PD). METHODS: In a randomized, crossover, open-label pilot trial, we compared a telemedicine period (regular visits every two months with intermediate video calls via an iPad mini) with a control period (regular visits every two months), both lasting 6 months. We included 10 patients diagnosed with PD according to the British Brain Bank criteria, aged 20–75 years. The primary outcome was the PD questionnaire summary index (PDQ-39 SI). Secondary outcomes included the Hoehn and Yahr Stage and scores on the Unified PD Rating Scale (UPDRS) part I–IV, Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and visual analog scale for satisfaction. RESULTS: Both study periods were completed by 10 patients with PD. Friedman's test revealed that there were no significant differences between the two periods in primary and secondary outcomes (p > 0.05). With respect to visual analog scale scores for satisfaction, participants indicated high satisfaction with the telemedicine system. The number of extra hospital visits and phone calls did not differ between the periods. There were no adverse events or side effects. CONCLUSIONS: We observed that a telemedicine system delivered via a tablet could successfully be used by patients as a part of their care. Further studies investigating the use of telemedicine to replace in-person visits are warranted. This trial is registered with UMIN000015536.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6339724
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63397242019-02-05 A Randomized Crossover Pilot Study of Telemedicine Delivered via iPads in Parkinson's Disease Sekimoto, Satoko Oyama, Genko Hatano, Taku Sasaki, Fuyuko Nakamura, Ryota Jo, Takayuki Shimo, Yasushi Hattori, Nobutaka Parkinsons Dis Clinical Study BACKGROUND: We investigated the feasibility and safety of a video-based telemedicine system, delivered via a tablet, in Parkinson's disease (PD). METHODS: In a randomized, crossover, open-label pilot trial, we compared a telemedicine period (regular visits every two months with intermediate video calls via an iPad mini) with a control period (regular visits every two months), both lasting 6 months. We included 10 patients diagnosed with PD according to the British Brain Bank criteria, aged 20–75 years. The primary outcome was the PD questionnaire summary index (PDQ-39 SI). Secondary outcomes included the Hoehn and Yahr Stage and scores on the Unified PD Rating Scale (UPDRS) part I–IV, Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and visual analog scale for satisfaction. RESULTS: Both study periods were completed by 10 patients with PD. Friedman's test revealed that there were no significant differences between the two periods in primary and secondary outcomes (p > 0.05). With respect to visual analog scale scores for satisfaction, participants indicated high satisfaction with the telemedicine system. The number of extra hospital visits and phone calls did not differ between the periods. There were no adverse events or side effects. CONCLUSIONS: We observed that a telemedicine system delivered via a tablet could successfully be used by patients as a part of their care. Further studies investigating the use of telemedicine to replace in-person visits are warranted. This trial is registered with UMIN000015536. Hindawi 2019-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6339724/ /pubmed/30723541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/9403295 Text en Copyright © 2019 Satoko Sekimoto et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Sekimoto, Satoko
Oyama, Genko
Hatano, Taku
Sasaki, Fuyuko
Nakamura, Ryota
Jo, Takayuki
Shimo, Yasushi
Hattori, Nobutaka
A Randomized Crossover Pilot Study of Telemedicine Delivered via iPads in Parkinson's Disease
title A Randomized Crossover Pilot Study of Telemedicine Delivered via iPads in Parkinson's Disease
title_full A Randomized Crossover Pilot Study of Telemedicine Delivered via iPads in Parkinson's Disease
title_fullStr A Randomized Crossover Pilot Study of Telemedicine Delivered via iPads in Parkinson's Disease
title_full_unstemmed A Randomized Crossover Pilot Study of Telemedicine Delivered via iPads in Parkinson's Disease
title_short A Randomized Crossover Pilot Study of Telemedicine Delivered via iPads in Parkinson's Disease
title_sort randomized crossover pilot study of telemedicine delivered via ipads in parkinson's disease
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6339724/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30723541
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/9403295
work_keys_str_mv AT sekimotosatoko arandomizedcrossoverpilotstudyoftelemedicinedeliveredviaipadsinparkinsonsdisease
AT oyamagenko arandomizedcrossoverpilotstudyoftelemedicinedeliveredviaipadsinparkinsonsdisease
AT hatanotaku arandomizedcrossoverpilotstudyoftelemedicinedeliveredviaipadsinparkinsonsdisease
AT sasakifuyuko arandomizedcrossoverpilotstudyoftelemedicinedeliveredviaipadsinparkinsonsdisease
AT nakamuraryota arandomizedcrossoverpilotstudyoftelemedicinedeliveredviaipadsinparkinsonsdisease
AT jotakayuki arandomizedcrossoverpilotstudyoftelemedicinedeliveredviaipadsinparkinsonsdisease
AT shimoyasushi arandomizedcrossoverpilotstudyoftelemedicinedeliveredviaipadsinparkinsonsdisease
AT hattorinobutaka arandomizedcrossoverpilotstudyoftelemedicinedeliveredviaipadsinparkinsonsdisease
AT sekimotosatoko randomizedcrossoverpilotstudyoftelemedicinedeliveredviaipadsinparkinsonsdisease
AT oyamagenko randomizedcrossoverpilotstudyoftelemedicinedeliveredviaipadsinparkinsonsdisease
AT hatanotaku randomizedcrossoverpilotstudyoftelemedicinedeliveredviaipadsinparkinsonsdisease
AT sasakifuyuko randomizedcrossoverpilotstudyoftelemedicinedeliveredviaipadsinparkinsonsdisease
AT nakamuraryota randomizedcrossoverpilotstudyoftelemedicinedeliveredviaipadsinparkinsonsdisease
AT jotakayuki randomizedcrossoverpilotstudyoftelemedicinedeliveredviaipadsinparkinsonsdisease
AT shimoyasushi randomizedcrossoverpilotstudyoftelemedicinedeliveredviaipadsinparkinsonsdisease
AT hattorinobutaka randomizedcrossoverpilotstudyoftelemedicinedeliveredviaipadsinparkinsonsdisease