Cargando…
Ranking Cancer Proteins by Integrating PPI Network and Protein Expression Profiles
Proteomics, the large-scale analysis of proteins, is contributing greatly to understanding gene function in the postgenomic era. However, disease protein ranking using shotgun proteomics data has not been fully evaluated. In this study, we prioritized disease-related proteins by integrating the prot...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6339728/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30723737 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/3907195 |
_version_ | 1783388678821773312 |
---|---|
author | Ren, Jie Shang, Lulu Wang, Qing Li, Jing |
author_facet | Ren, Jie Shang, Lulu Wang, Qing Li, Jing |
author_sort | Ren, Jie |
collection | PubMed |
description | Proteomics, the large-scale analysis of proteins, is contributing greatly to understanding gene function in the postgenomic era. However, disease protein ranking using shotgun proteomics data has not been fully evaluated. In this study, we prioritized disease-related proteins by integrating the protein-protein interaction (PPI) network and protein differential expression profiles from colon and rectal cancer (CRC) or breast cancer (BC) proteomics. We applied Local Ranking (LR) and Global Ranking (GR) methods in network with three kinds of protein sets as a priori knowledge, which were known disease proteins (KDPs) that were collected from the Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM) database, differentially expressed proteins (DEPs), and the collection of KDPs and their direct neighborhood with differential expression (eKDPs). The cross-validations showed that GR method outperformed LR method while using eKDPs as the initial training showed significantly higher accuracy compared to using the other two a priori sets. And then we validated the top ranked proteins using RNAi-based loss-of-function screens in the DepMap database. The results showed that 75% of top 20 proteins in CRC are necessary for tumor survival. In summary, the network-based Global Ranking with protein differential expression can efficiently prioritize cancer-related proteins and discover new candidate cancer genes or proteins. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6339728 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63397282019-02-05 Ranking Cancer Proteins by Integrating PPI Network and Protein Expression Profiles Ren, Jie Shang, Lulu Wang, Qing Li, Jing Biomed Res Int Research Article Proteomics, the large-scale analysis of proteins, is contributing greatly to understanding gene function in the postgenomic era. However, disease protein ranking using shotgun proteomics data has not been fully evaluated. In this study, we prioritized disease-related proteins by integrating the protein-protein interaction (PPI) network and protein differential expression profiles from colon and rectal cancer (CRC) or breast cancer (BC) proteomics. We applied Local Ranking (LR) and Global Ranking (GR) methods in network with three kinds of protein sets as a priori knowledge, which were known disease proteins (KDPs) that were collected from the Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM) database, differentially expressed proteins (DEPs), and the collection of KDPs and their direct neighborhood with differential expression (eKDPs). The cross-validations showed that GR method outperformed LR method while using eKDPs as the initial training showed significantly higher accuracy compared to using the other two a priori sets. And then we validated the top ranked proteins using RNAi-based loss-of-function screens in the DepMap database. The results showed that 75% of top 20 proteins in CRC are necessary for tumor survival. In summary, the network-based Global Ranking with protein differential expression can efficiently prioritize cancer-related proteins and discover new candidate cancer genes or proteins. Hindawi 2019-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6339728/ /pubmed/30723737 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/3907195 Text en Copyright © 2019 Jie Ren et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ren, Jie Shang, Lulu Wang, Qing Li, Jing Ranking Cancer Proteins by Integrating PPI Network and Protein Expression Profiles |
title | Ranking Cancer Proteins by Integrating PPI Network and Protein Expression Profiles |
title_full | Ranking Cancer Proteins by Integrating PPI Network and Protein Expression Profiles |
title_fullStr | Ranking Cancer Proteins by Integrating PPI Network and Protein Expression Profiles |
title_full_unstemmed | Ranking Cancer Proteins by Integrating PPI Network and Protein Expression Profiles |
title_short | Ranking Cancer Proteins by Integrating PPI Network and Protein Expression Profiles |
title_sort | ranking cancer proteins by integrating ppi network and protein expression profiles |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6339728/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30723737 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/3907195 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT renjie rankingcancerproteinsbyintegratingppinetworkandproteinexpressionprofiles AT shanglulu rankingcancerproteinsbyintegratingppinetworkandproteinexpressionprofiles AT wangqing rankingcancerproteinsbyintegratingppinetworkandproteinexpressionprofiles AT lijing rankingcancerproteinsbyintegratingppinetworkandproteinexpressionprofiles |