Cargando…

Genome-Wide Gene-Environment Interaction Analysis Using Set-Based Association Tests

The identification of gene-environment interactions (G × E) may eventually guide health-related choices and medical interventions for complex diseases. More powerful methods must be developed to identify G × E. The “adaptive combination of Bayes factors method” (ADABF) has been proposed as a powerfu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Wan-Yu, Huang, Ching-Chieh, Liu, Yu-Li, Tsai, Shih-Jen, Kuo, Po-Hsiu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6339974/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30693016
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2018.00715
_version_ 1783388720926294016
author Lin, Wan-Yu
Huang, Ching-Chieh
Liu, Yu-Li
Tsai, Shih-Jen
Kuo, Po-Hsiu
author_facet Lin, Wan-Yu
Huang, Ching-Chieh
Liu, Yu-Li
Tsai, Shih-Jen
Kuo, Po-Hsiu
author_sort Lin, Wan-Yu
collection PubMed
description The identification of gene-environment interactions (G × E) may eventually guide health-related choices and medical interventions for complex diseases. More powerful methods must be developed to identify G × E. The “adaptive combination of Bayes factors method” (ADABF) has been proposed as a powerful genome-wide polygenic approach to detect G × E. In this work, we evaluate its performance when serving as a gene-based G × E test. We compare ADABF with six tests including the “Set-Based gene-EnviRonment InterAction test” (SBERIA), “gene-environment set association test” (GESAT), etc. With extensive simulations, SBERIA and ADABF are found to be more powerful than other G × E tests. However, SBERIA suffers from a power loss when 50% SNP main effects are in the same direction with the SNP × E interaction effects while 50% are in the opposite direction. We further applied these seven G × E methods to the Taiwan Biobank data to explore gene× alcohol interactions on blood pressure levels. The ADAMTS7P1 gene at chromosome 15q25.2 was detected to interact with alcohol consumption on diastolic blood pressure (p = 9.5 × 10(−7), according to the GESAT test). At this gene, the P-values provided by other six tests all reached the suggestive significance level (p < 5 × 10(−5)). Regarding the computation time required for a genome-wide G × E analysis, SBERIA is the fastest method, followed by ADABF. Considering the validity, power performance, robustness, and computation time, ADABF is recommended for genome-wide G × E analyses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6339974
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63399742019-01-28 Genome-Wide Gene-Environment Interaction Analysis Using Set-Based Association Tests Lin, Wan-Yu Huang, Ching-Chieh Liu, Yu-Li Tsai, Shih-Jen Kuo, Po-Hsiu Front Genet Genetics The identification of gene-environment interactions (G × E) may eventually guide health-related choices and medical interventions for complex diseases. More powerful methods must be developed to identify G × E. The “adaptive combination of Bayes factors method” (ADABF) has been proposed as a powerful genome-wide polygenic approach to detect G × E. In this work, we evaluate its performance when serving as a gene-based G × E test. We compare ADABF with six tests including the “Set-Based gene-EnviRonment InterAction test” (SBERIA), “gene-environment set association test” (GESAT), etc. With extensive simulations, SBERIA and ADABF are found to be more powerful than other G × E tests. However, SBERIA suffers from a power loss when 50% SNP main effects are in the same direction with the SNP × E interaction effects while 50% are in the opposite direction. We further applied these seven G × E methods to the Taiwan Biobank data to explore gene× alcohol interactions on blood pressure levels. The ADAMTS7P1 gene at chromosome 15q25.2 was detected to interact with alcohol consumption on diastolic blood pressure (p = 9.5 × 10(−7), according to the GESAT test). At this gene, the P-values provided by other six tests all reached the suggestive significance level (p < 5 × 10(−5)). Regarding the computation time required for a genome-wide G × E analysis, SBERIA is the fastest method, followed by ADABF. Considering the validity, power performance, robustness, and computation time, ADABF is recommended for genome-wide G × E analyses. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6339974/ /pubmed/30693016 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2018.00715 Text en Copyright © 2019 Lin, Huang, Liu, Tsai and Kuo. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Genetics
Lin, Wan-Yu
Huang, Ching-Chieh
Liu, Yu-Li
Tsai, Shih-Jen
Kuo, Po-Hsiu
Genome-Wide Gene-Environment Interaction Analysis Using Set-Based Association Tests
title Genome-Wide Gene-Environment Interaction Analysis Using Set-Based Association Tests
title_full Genome-Wide Gene-Environment Interaction Analysis Using Set-Based Association Tests
title_fullStr Genome-Wide Gene-Environment Interaction Analysis Using Set-Based Association Tests
title_full_unstemmed Genome-Wide Gene-Environment Interaction Analysis Using Set-Based Association Tests
title_short Genome-Wide Gene-Environment Interaction Analysis Using Set-Based Association Tests
title_sort genome-wide gene-environment interaction analysis using set-based association tests
topic Genetics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6339974/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30693016
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2018.00715
work_keys_str_mv AT linwanyu genomewidegeneenvironmentinteractionanalysisusingsetbasedassociationtests
AT huangchingchieh genomewidegeneenvironmentinteractionanalysisusingsetbasedassociationtests
AT liuyuli genomewidegeneenvironmentinteractionanalysisusingsetbasedassociationtests
AT tsaishihjen genomewidegeneenvironmentinteractionanalysisusingsetbasedassociationtests
AT kuopohsiu genomewidegeneenvironmentinteractionanalysisusingsetbasedassociationtests