Cargando…
Genome-Wide Gene-Environment Interaction Analysis Using Set-Based Association Tests
The identification of gene-environment interactions (G × E) may eventually guide health-related choices and medical interventions for complex diseases. More powerful methods must be developed to identify G × E. The “adaptive combination of Bayes factors method” (ADABF) has been proposed as a powerfu...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6339974/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30693016 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2018.00715 |
_version_ | 1783388720926294016 |
---|---|
author | Lin, Wan-Yu Huang, Ching-Chieh Liu, Yu-Li Tsai, Shih-Jen Kuo, Po-Hsiu |
author_facet | Lin, Wan-Yu Huang, Ching-Chieh Liu, Yu-Li Tsai, Shih-Jen Kuo, Po-Hsiu |
author_sort | Lin, Wan-Yu |
collection | PubMed |
description | The identification of gene-environment interactions (G × E) may eventually guide health-related choices and medical interventions for complex diseases. More powerful methods must be developed to identify G × E. The “adaptive combination of Bayes factors method” (ADABF) has been proposed as a powerful genome-wide polygenic approach to detect G × E. In this work, we evaluate its performance when serving as a gene-based G × E test. We compare ADABF with six tests including the “Set-Based gene-EnviRonment InterAction test” (SBERIA), “gene-environment set association test” (GESAT), etc. With extensive simulations, SBERIA and ADABF are found to be more powerful than other G × E tests. However, SBERIA suffers from a power loss when 50% SNP main effects are in the same direction with the SNP × E interaction effects while 50% are in the opposite direction. We further applied these seven G × E methods to the Taiwan Biobank data to explore gene× alcohol interactions on blood pressure levels. The ADAMTS7P1 gene at chromosome 15q25.2 was detected to interact with alcohol consumption on diastolic blood pressure (p = 9.5 × 10(−7), according to the GESAT test). At this gene, the P-values provided by other six tests all reached the suggestive significance level (p < 5 × 10(−5)). Regarding the computation time required for a genome-wide G × E analysis, SBERIA is the fastest method, followed by ADABF. Considering the validity, power performance, robustness, and computation time, ADABF is recommended for genome-wide G × E analyses. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6339974 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63399742019-01-28 Genome-Wide Gene-Environment Interaction Analysis Using Set-Based Association Tests Lin, Wan-Yu Huang, Ching-Chieh Liu, Yu-Li Tsai, Shih-Jen Kuo, Po-Hsiu Front Genet Genetics The identification of gene-environment interactions (G × E) may eventually guide health-related choices and medical interventions for complex diseases. More powerful methods must be developed to identify G × E. The “adaptive combination of Bayes factors method” (ADABF) has been proposed as a powerful genome-wide polygenic approach to detect G × E. In this work, we evaluate its performance when serving as a gene-based G × E test. We compare ADABF with six tests including the “Set-Based gene-EnviRonment InterAction test” (SBERIA), “gene-environment set association test” (GESAT), etc. With extensive simulations, SBERIA and ADABF are found to be more powerful than other G × E tests. However, SBERIA suffers from a power loss when 50% SNP main effects are in the same direction with the SNP × E interaction effects while 50% are in the opposite direction. We further applied these seven G × E methods to the Taiwan Biobank data to explore gene× alcohol interactions on blood pressure levels. The ADAMTS7P1 gene at chromosome 15q25.2 was detected to interact with alcohol consumption on diastolic blood pressure (p = 9.5 × 10(−7), according to the GESAT test). At this gene, the P-values provided by other six tests all reached the suggestive significance level (p < 5 × 10(−5)). Regarding the computation time required for a genome-wide G × E analysis, SBERIA is the fastest method, followed by ADABF. Considering the validity, power performance, robustness, and computation time, ADABF is recommended for genome-wide G × E analyses. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6339974/ /pubmed/30693016 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2018.00715 Text en Copyright © 2019 Lin, Huang, Liu, Tsai and Kuo. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Genetics Lin, Wan-Yu Huang, Ching-Chieh Liu, Yu-Li Tsai, Shih-Jen Kuo, Po-Hsiu Genome-Wide Gene-Environment Interaction Analysis Using Set-Based Association Tests |
title | Genome-Wide Gene-Environment Interaction Analysis Using Set-Based Association Tests |
title_full | Genome-Wide Gene-Environment Interaction Analysis Using Set-Based Association Tests |
title_fullStr | Genome-Wide Gene-Environment Interaction Analysis Using Set-Based Association Tests |
title_full_unstemmed | Genome-Wide Gene-Environment Interaction Analysis Using Set-Based Association Tests |
title_short | Genome-Wide Gene-Environment Interaction Analysis Using Set-Based Association Tests |
title_sort | genome-wide gene-environment interaction analysis using set-based association tests |
topic | Genetics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6339974/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30693016 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2018.00715 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT linwanyu genomewidegeneenvironmentinteractionanalysisusingsetbasedassociationtests AT huangchingchieh genomewidegeneenvironmentinteractionanalysisusingsetbasedassociationtests AT liuyuli genomewidegeneenvironmentinteractionanalysisusingsetbasedassociationtests AT tsaishihjen genomewidegeneenvironmentinteractionanalysisusingsetbasedassociationtests AT kuopohsiu genomewidegeneenvironmentinteractionanalysisusingsetbasedassociationtests |