Cargando…

Hand osteoid osteoma: evaluation of diagnosis and treatment

BACKGROUND: OO (osteoid osteoma) is a common, osteoblastic, benign bone tumor but rarely seen in the hand region. There is still some debate about the diagnosis and treatment of hand OOs. In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the epidemiology, radiologic features, surgical treatment options and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Erdogan, Ozgur, Gurkan, Volkan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6340177/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30665467
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-019-0361-1
_version_ 1783388752741138432
author Erdogan, Ozgur
Gurkan, Volkan
author_facet Erdogan, Ozgur
Gurkan, Volkan
author_sort Erdogan, Ozgur
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: OO (osteoid osteoma) is a common, osteoblastic, benign bone tumor but rarely seen in the hand region. There is still some debate about the diagnosis and treatment of hand OOs. In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the epidemiology, radiologic features, surgical treatment options and functional outcomes. METHODS: Between January 2003 and December 2014, surgically treated and pathologically verified 9 hand OO cases were investigated retrospectively. The preoperative and postoperative clinical outcome scores were calculated using the M2-DASH (Manchester-Modified Disabilities of Arm Shoulder and Hand) Score. RESULTS: Lesion locations were as follows: middle phalanx in 2/9 (22%) patients (2nd and 4th digit), proximal phalanx in 6/9 (67%) patients (one 4th, two 2nd and three 5th digits) and metacarpal (2nd) in 1/9 (11%) patient. Incidence of nidus formation was 6/9 (67%) on X-ray, 7/9 (78%) on CT imaging and 2/9 (22%) on MR imaging. The mean time to diagnosis was 13.22 ± 5.44 months. Preoperative mean M2-DASH score was 41 ± 6 and postoperative was 7.4 ± 8.6. CONCLUSION: Osteoid osteoma is usually seen below 25 years, and rarely found over 40 years of age. There is male dominance with a male to female ratio of 3:1. Delay of diagnosis may be encountered because of many differential diagnoses. When OO is suspected, CT imaging should be taken before the MR imaging. Because of superiority in soft tissue imaging, MR imaging should be an alternative tool in complex cases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6340177
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63401772019-01-24 Hand osteoid osteoma: evaluation of diagnosis and treatment Erdogan, Ozgur Gurkan, Volkan Eur J Med Res Research BACKGROUND: OO (osteoid osteoma) is a common, osteoblastic, benign bone tumor but rarely seen in the hand region. There is still some debate about the diagnosis and treatment of hand OOs. In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the epidemiology, radiologic features, surgical treatment options and functional outcomes. METHODS: Between January 2003 and December 2014, surgically treated and pathologically verified 9 hand OO cases were investigated retrospectively. The preoperative and postoperative clinical outcome scores were calculated using the M2-DASH (Manchester-Modified Disabilities of Arm Shoulder and Hand) Score. RESULTS: Lesion locations were as follows: middle phalanx in 2/9 (22%) patients (2nd and 4th digit), proximal phalanx in 6/9 (67%) patients (one 4th, two 2nd and three 5th digits) and metacarpal (2nd) in 1/9 (11%) patient. Incidence of nidus formation was 6/9 (67%) on X-ray, 7/9 (78%) on CT imaging and 2/9 (22%) on MR imaging. The mean time to diagnosis was 13.22 ± 5.44 months. Preoperative mean M2-DASH score was 41 ± 6 and postoperative was 7.4 ± 8.6. CONCLUSION: Osteoid osteoma is usually seen below 25 years, and rarely found over 40 years of age. There is male dominance with a male to female ratio of 3:1. Delay of diagnosis may be encountered because of many differential diagnoses. When OO is suspected, CT imaging should be taken before the MR imaging. Because of superiority in soft tissue imaging, MR imaging should be an alternative tool in complex cases. BioMed Central 2019-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6340177/ /pubmed/30665467 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-019-0361-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Erdogan, Ozgur
Gurkan, Volkan
Hand osteoid osteoma: evaluation of diagnosis and treatment
title Hand osteoid osteoma: evaluation of diagnosis and treatment
title_full Hand osteoid osteoma: evaluation of diagnosis and treatment
title_fullStr Hand osteoid osteoma: evaluation of diagnosis and treatment
title_full_unstemmed Hand osteoid osteoma: evaluation of diagnosis and treatment
title_short Hand osteoid osteoma: evaluation of diagnosis and treatment
title_sort hand osteoid osteoma: evaluation of diagnosis and treatment
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6340177/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30665467
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-019-0361-1
work_keys_str_mv AT erdoganozgur handosteoidosteomaevaluationofdiagnosisandtreatment
AT gurkanvolkan handosteoidosteomaevaluationofdiagnosisandtreatment