Cargando…
Hand osteoid osteoma: evaluation of diagnosis and treatment
BACKGROUND: OO (osteoid osteoma) is a common, osteoblastic, benign bone tumor but rarely seen in the hand region. There is still some debate about the diagnosis and treatment of hand OOs. In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the epidemiology, radiologic features, surgical treatment options and...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6340177/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30665467 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-019-0361-1 |
_version_ | 1783388752741138432 |
---|---|
author | Erdogan, Ozgur Gurkan, Volkan |
author_facet | Erdogan, Ozgur Gurkan, Volkan |
author_sort | Erdogan, Ozgur |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: OO (osteoid osteoma) is a common, osteoblastic, benign bone tumor but rarely seen in the hand region. There is still some debate about the diagnosis and treatment of hand OOs. In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the epidemiology, radiologic features, surgical treatment options and functional outcomes. METHODS: Between January 2003 and December 2014, surgically treated and pathologically verified 9 hand OO cases were investigated retrospectively. The preoperative and postoperative clinical outcome scores were calculated using the M2-DASH (Manchester-Modified Disabilities of Arm Shoulder and Hand) Score. RESULTS: Lesion locations were as follows: middle phalanx in 2/9 (22%) patients (2nd and 4th digit), proximal phalanx in 6/9 (67%) patients (one 4th, two 2nd and three 5th digits) and metacarpal (2nd) in 1/9 (11%) patient. Incidence of nidus formation was 6/9 (67%) on X-ray, 7/9 (78%) on CT imaging and 2/9 (22%) on MR imaging. The mean time to diagnosis was 13.22 ± 5.44 months. Preoperative mean M2-DASH score was 41 ± 6 and postoperative was 7.4 ± 8.6. CONCLUSION: Osteoid osteoma is usually seen below 25 years, and rarely found over 40 years of age. There is male dominance with a male to female ratio of 3:1. Delay of diagnosis may be encountered because of many differential diagnoses. When OO is suspected, CT imaging should be taken before the MR imaging. Because of superiority in soft tissue imaging, MR imaging should be an alternative tool in complex cases. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6340177 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63401772019-01-24 Hand osteoid osteoma: evaluation of diagnosis and treatment Erdogan, Ozgur Gurkan, Volkan Eur J Med Res Research BACKGROUND: OO (osteoid osteoma) is a common, osteoblastic, benign bone tumor but rarely seen in the hand region. There is still some debate about the diagnosis and treatment of hand OOs. In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the epidemiology, radiologic features, surgical treatment options and functional outcomes. METHODS: Between January 2003 and December 2014, surgically treated and pathologically verified 9 hand OO cases were investigated retrospectively. The preoperative and postoperative clinical outcome scores were calculated using the M2-DASH (Manchester-Modified Disabilities of Arm Shoulder and Hand) Score. RESULTS: Lesion locations were as follows: middle phalanx in 2/9 (22%) patients (2nd and 4th digit), proximal phalanx in 6/9 (67%) patients (one 4th, two 2nd and three 5th digits) and metacarpal (2nd) in 1/9 (11%) patient. Incidence of nidus formation was 6/9 (67%) on X-ray, 7/9 (78%) on CT imaging and 2/9 (22%) on MR imaging. The mean time to diagnosis was 13.22 ± 5.44 months. Preoperative mean M2-DASH score was 41 ± 6 and postoperative was 7.4 ± 8.6. CONCLUSION: Osteoid osteoma is usually seen below 25 years, and rarely found over 40 years of age. There is male dominance with a male to female ratio of 3:1. Delay of diagnosis may be encountered because of many differential diagnoses. When OO is suspected, CT imaging should be taken before the MR imaging. Because of superiority in soft tissue imaging, MR imaging should be an alternative tool in complex cases. BioMed Central 2019-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6340177/ /pubmed/30665467 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-019-0361-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Erdogan, Ozgur Gurkan, Volkan Hand osteoid osteoma: evaluation of diagnosis and treatment |
title | Hand osteoid osteoma: evaluation of diagnosis and treatment |
title_full | Hand osteoid osteoma: evaluation of diagnosis and treatment |
title_fullStr | Hand osteoid osteoma: evaluation of diagnosis and treatment |
title_full_unstemmed | Hand osteoid osteoma: evaluation of diagnosis and treatment |
title_short | Hand osteoid osteoma: evaluation of diagnosis and treatment |
title_sort | hand osteoid osteoma: evaluation of diagnosis and treatment |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6340177/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30665467 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-019-0361-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT erdoganozgur handosteoidosteomaevaluationofdiagnosisandtreatment AT gurkanvolkan handosteoidosteomaevaluationofdiagnosisandtreatment |