Cargando…
A comparative study of the clinical efficiency of chemomechanical caries removal using Carie-Care gel for permanent teeth of children of age group of 12–15 years with that of conventional drilling method: A randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Dental caries is considered as one of the most serious dental diseases that results in localized dissolution and destruction of the calcified tooth tissues. As possible alternatives to conventional techniques of caries removal, chemomechanical caries removal systems have emerged. This st...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6340223/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30745918 |
_version_ | 1783388763544616960 |
---|---|
author | Sontakke, Priyanka Jain, Prateek Patil, Aniket Dhote Biswas, Gautam Yadav, Pramod Makkar, Diljot Kaur Jeph, Vikas Sakina, Banu Pyari |
author_facet | Sontakke, Priyanka Jain, Prateek Patil, Aniket Dhote Biswas, Gautam Yadav, Pramod Makkar, Diljot Kaur Jeph, Vikas Sakina, Banu Pyari |
author_sort | Sontakke, Priyanka |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Dental caries is considered as one of the most serious dental diseases that results in localized dissolution and destruction of the calcified tooth tissues. As possible alternatives to conventional techniques of caries removal, chemomechanical caries removal systems have emerged. This study aims to clinically observe the advantages of chemomechanical method of caries removal over conventional technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Inthis randomized controlled trial a total of 60 children with Class 1 open carious lesions were selected for the study. They were divided into two equal groups according to a method of caries removal (30 chemomechanical and 30 conventional on permanent molars). In Group A, caries was removed using the Carie-Care system and in Group B with the conventional drill and were restored equally with glass ionomer cement. The visual analogy face scale was used to determine the level of anxiety in children at baseline, during treatment and after treatment. RESULTS: The results were subjected to statistical analysis using Student's unpaired t-test. It showed that though chemomechanical technique took a marginal increase in time compared to the conventional technique, it was found to be more comfortable for all the children. CONCLUSION: Chemomechanical technique though time-consuming is definitely superior compared to the conventional technique provided we use a less technique sensitive restorative material which retains in the oral cavity for longer period. It is definitely a better treatment protocol in school-based dental treatment and atraumatic restorative dentistry compared to the conventional technique. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6340223 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63402232019-02-11 A comparative study of the clinical efficiency of chemomechanical caries removal using Carie-Care gel for permanent teeth of children of age group of 12–15 years with that of conventional drilling method: A randomized controlled trial Sontakke, Priyanka Jain, Prateek Patil, Aniket Dhote Biswas, Gautam Yadav, Pramod Makkar, Diljot Kaur Jeph, Vikas Sakina, Banu Pyari Dent Res J (Isfahan) Original Article BACKGROUND: Dental caries is considered as one of the most serious dental diseases that results in localized dissolution and destruction of the calcified tooth tissues. As possible alternatives to conventional techniques of caries removal, chemomechanical caries removal systems have emerged. This study aims to clinically observe the advantages of chemomechanical method of caries removal over conventional technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Inthis randomized controlled trial a total of 60 children with Class 1 open carious lesions were selected for the study. They were divided into two equal groups according to a method of caries removal (30 chemomechanical and 30 conventional on permanent molars). In Group A, caries was removed using the Carie-Care system and in Group B with the conventional drill and were restored equally with glass ionomer cement. The visual analogy face scale was used to determine the level of anxiety in children at baseline, during treatment and after treatment. RESULTS: The results were subjected to statistical analysis using Student's unpaired t-test. It showed that though chemomechanical technique took a marginal increase in time compared to the conventional technique, it was found to be more comfortable for all the children. CONCLUSION: Chemomechanical technique though time-consuming is definitely superior compared to the conventional technique provided we use a less technique sensitive restorative material which retains in the oral cavity for longer period. It is definitely a better treatment protocol in school-based dental treatment and atraumatic restorative dentistry compared to the conventional technique. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6340223/ /pubmed/30745918 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Dental Research Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Sontakke, Priyanka Jain, Prateek Patil, Aniket Dhote Biswas, Gautam Yadav, Pramod Makkar, Diljot Kaur Jeph, Vikas Sakina, Banu Pyari A comparative study of the clinical efficiency of chemomechanical caries removal using Carie-Care gel for permanent teeth of children of age group of 12–15 years with that of conventional drilling method: A randomized controlled trial |
title | A comparative study of the clinical efficiency of chemomechanical caries removal using Carie-Care gel for permanent teeth of children of age group of 12–15 years with that of conventional drilling method: A randomized controlled trial |
title_full | A comparative study of the clinical efficiency of chemomechanical caries removal using Carie-Care gel for permanent teeth of children of age group of 12–15 years with that of conventional drilling method: A randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | A comparative study of the clinical efficiency of chemomechanical caries removal using Carie-Care gel for permanent teeth of children of age group of 12–15 years with that of conventional drilling method: A randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparative study of the clinical efficiency of chemomechanical caries removal using Carie-Care gel for permanent teeth of children of age group of 12–15 years with that of conventional drilling method: A randomized controlled trial |
title_short | A comparative study of the clinical efficiency of chemomechanical caries removal using Carie-Care gel for permanent teeth of children of age group of 12–15 years with that of conventional drilling method: A randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | comparative study of the clinical efficiency of chemomechanical caries removal using carie-care gel for permanent teeth of children of age group of 12–15 years with that of conventional drilling method: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6340223/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30745918 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sontakkepriyanka acomparativestudyoftheclinicalefficiencyofchemomechanicalcariesremovalusingcariecaregelforpermanentteethofchildrenofagegroupof1215yearswiththatofconventionaldrillingmethodarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT jainprateek acomparativestudyoftheclinicalefficiencyofchemomechanicalcariesremovalusingcariecaregelforpermanentteethofchildrenofagegroupof1215yearswiththatofconventionaldrillingmethodarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT patilaniketdhote acomparativestudyoftheclinicalefficiencyofchemomechanicalcariesremovalusingcariecaregelforpermanentteethofchildrenofagegroupof1215yearswiththatofconventionaldrillingmethodarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT biswasgautam acomparativestudyoftheclinicalefficiencyofchemomechanicalcariesremovalusingcariecaregelforpermanentteethofchildrenofagegroupof1215yearswiththatofconventionaldrillingmethodarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT yadavpramod acomparativestudyoftheclinicalefficiencyofchemomechanicalcariesremovalusingcariecaregelforpermanentteethofchildrenofagegroupof1215yearswiththatofconventionaldrillingmethodarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT makkardiljotkaur acomparativestudyoftheclinicalefficiencyofchemomechanicalcariesremovalusingcariecaregelforpermanentteethofchildrenofagegroupof1215yearswiththatofconventionaldrillingmethodarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT jephvikas acomparativestudyoftheclinicalefficiencyofchemomechanicalcariesremovalusingcariecaregelforpermanentteethofchildrenofagegroupof1215yearswiththatofconventionaldrillingmethodarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT sakinabanupyari acomparativestudyoftheclinicalefficiencyofchemomechanicalcariesremovalusingcariecaregelforpermanentteethofchildrenofagegroupof1215yearswiththatofconventionaldrillingmethodarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT sontakkepriyanka comparativestudyoftheclinicalefficiencyofchemomechanicalcariesremovalusingcariecaregelforpermanentteethofchildrenofagegroupof1215yearswiththatofconventionaldrillingmethodarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT jainprateek comparativestudyoftheclinicalefficiencyofchemomechanicalcariesremovalusingcariecaregelforpermanentteethofchildrenofagegroupof1215yearswiththatofconventionaldrillingmethodarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT patilaniketdhote comparativestudyoftheclinicalefficiencyofchemomechanicalcariesremovalusingcariecaregelforpermanentteethofchildrenofagegroupof1215yearswiththatofconventionaldrillingmethodarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT biswasgautam comparativestudyoftheclinicalefficiencyofchemomechanicalcariesremovalusingcariecaregelforpermanentteethofchildrenofagegroupof1215yearswiththatofconventionaldrillingmethodarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT yadavpramod comparativestudyoftheclinicalefficiencyofchemomechanicalcariesremovalusingcariecaregelforpermanentteethofchildrenofagegroupof1215yearswiththatofconventionaldrillingmethodarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT makkardiljotkaur comparativestudyoftheclinicalefficiencyofchemomechanicalcariesremovalusingcariecaregelforpermanentteethofchildrenofagegroupof1215yearswiththatofconventionaldrillingmethodarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT jephvikas comparativestudyoftheclinicalefficiencyofchemomechanicalcariesremovalusingcariecaregelforpermanentteethofchildrenofagegroupof1215yearswiththatofconventionaldrillingmethodarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT sakinabanupyari comparativestudyoftheclinicalefficiencyofchemomechanicalcariesremovalusingcariecaregelforpermanentteethofchildrenofagegroupof1215yearswiththatofconventionaldrillingmethodarandomizedcontrolledtrial |