Cargando…
Qualitative study investigating the underlying motivations of healthy participants in phase I clinical trials
OBJECTIVES: If patients are to reap the benefits of continued drug development, an understanding of why healthy participants take part in phase I clinical trials is imperative. The current study aimed to explore the nature of these underlying motivations which may, in turn, improve the overall parti...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6340482/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30647042 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024224 |
_version_ | 1783388805982584832 |
---|---|
author | Manton, Kerry J Gauld, Cassandra S White, Katherine M Griffin, Paul M Elliott, Suzanne L |
author_facet | Manton, Kerry J Gauld, Cassandra S White, Katherine M Griffin, Paul M Elliott, Suzanne L |
author_sort | Manton, Kerry J |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: If patients are to reap the benefits of continued drug development, an understanding of why healthy participants take part in phase I clinical trials is imperative. The current study aimed to explore the nature of these underlying motivations which may, in turn, improve the overall participant experience and assist in the development of more effective recruitment and retention strategies. DESIGN: This study used a qualitative design based on the theory of planned behaviour. Specifically, it explored healthy participants’ underlying behavioural, control and normative beliefs which influence their participation in phase I clinical trials. SETTING: This study took place at a company that specialises in conducting phase I and phase II clinical trials in the Australian state of Queensland. PARTICIPANTS: Participants (n=31) were either currently undergoing a phase I clinical trial or had previously taken part in a phase I clinical trial. RESULTS: Results showed that the motivations were varied and not solely centred on financial gains. Reported advantages of participation included altruism, while inconvenience was most often reported as a disadvantage. Friends were reported as those most likely to approve, while one’s mother was reported as most likely to disapprove. Having a suitable time frame/flexible scheduling and feeling comfortable taking part in the trial were both the most commonly reported facilitators, while inflexible scheduling/time commitment was the most commonly reported barrier. CONCLUSIONS: Practical implications included the need for organisations involved in clinical trials to be mindful of inflexible scheduling and exploring the possibility of making educational materials available to family members who may be concerned about the risks associated with participation. Overall, it is anticipated that the results of this study will improve the understanding of factors that influence phase I clinical trial participation which may, ultimately, help develop new therapeutics to improve patient health. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6340482 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63404822019-02-02 Qualitative study investigating the underlying motivations of healthy participants in phase I clinical trials Manton, Kerry J Gauld, Cassandra S White, Katherine M Griffin, Paul M Elliott, Suzanne L BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVES: If patients are to reap the benefits of continued drug development, an understanding of why healthy participants take part in phase I clinical trials is imperative. The current study aimed to explore the nature of these underlying motivations which may, in turn, improve the overall participant experience and assist in the development of more effective recruitment and retention strategies. DESIGN: This study used a qualitative design based on the theory of planned behaviour. Specifically, it explored healthy participants’ underlying behavioural, control and normative beliefs which influence their participation in phase I clinical trials. SETTING: This study took place at a company that specialises in conducting phase I and phase II clinical trials in the Australian state of Queensland. PARTICIPANTS: Participants (n=31) were either currently undergoing a phase I clinical trial or had previously taken part in a phase I clinical trial. RESULTS: Results showed that the motivations were varied and not solely centred on financial gains. Reported advantages of participation included altruism, while inconvenience was most often reported as a disadvantage. Friends were reported as those most likely to approve, while one’s mother was reported as most likely to disapprove. Having a suitable time frame/flexible scheduling and feeling comfortable taking part in the trial were both the most commonly reported facilitators, while inflexible scheduling/time commitment was the most commonly reported barrier. CONCLUSIONS: Practical implications included the need for organisations involved in clinical trials to be mindful of inflexible scheduling and exploring the possibility of making educational materials available to family members who may be concerned about the risks associated with participation. Overall, it is anticipated that the results of this study will improve the understanding of factors that influence phase I clinical trial participation which may, ultimately, help develop new therapeutics to improve patient health. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6340482/ /pubmed/30647042 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024224 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Public Health Manton, Kerry J Gauld, Cassandra S White, Katherine M Griffin, Paul M Elliott, Suzanne L Qualitative study investigating the underlying motivations of healthy participants in phase I clinical trials |
title | Qualitative study investigating the underlying motivations of healthy participants in phase I clinical trials |
title_full | Qualitative study investigating the underlying motivations of healthy participants in phase I clinical trials |
title_fullStr | Qualitative study investigating the underlying motivations of healthy participants in phase I clinical trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Qualitative study investigating the underlying motivations of healthy participants in phase I clinical trials |
title_short | Qualitative study investigating the underlying motivations of healthy participants in phase I clinical trials |
title_sort | qualitative study investigating the underlying motivations of healthy participants in phase i clinical trials |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6340482/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30647042 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024224 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mantonkerryj qualitativestudyinvestigatingtheunderlyingmotivationsofhealthyparticipantsinphaseiclinicaltrials AT gauldcassandras qualitativestudyinvestigatingtheunderlyingmotivationsofhealthyparticipantsinphaseiclinicaltrials AT whitekatherinem qualitativestudyinvestigatingtheunderlyingmotivationsofhealthyparticipantsinphaseiclinicaltrials AT griffinpaulm qualitativestudyinvestigatingtheunderlyingmotivationsofhealthyparticipantsinphaseiclinicaltrials AT elliottsuzannel qualitativestudyinvestigatingtheunderlyingmotivationsofhealthyparticipantsinphaseiclinicaltrials |