Cargando…

Assessment of public oral healthcare services in Curitiba, Brazil: a cross-sectional study using the Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCATool)

OBJECTIVES: To compare two different models of public oral health in primary care services, a so-called family health strategy (FHS), as opposed to non-FHS services designated as ‘conventional’ healthcare (CHC), regarding the presence and extent of the attributes of ‘good’ primary healthcare (PHC)....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nascimento, Antonio Carlos, Moysés, Simone Tetü, Werneck, Renata Iani, Gabardo, Marilisa Carneiro Leão, Moysés, Samuel Jorge
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6340483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30659038
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023283
_version_ 1783388806215368704
author Nascimento, Antonio Carlos
Moysés, Simone Tetü
Werneck, Renata Iani
Gabardo, Marilisa Carneiro Leão
Moysés, Samuel Jorge
author_facet Nascimento, Antonio Carlos
Moysés, Simone Tetü
Werneck, Renata Iani
Gabardo, Marilisa Carneiro Leão
Moysés, Samuel Jorge
author_sort Nascimento, Antonio Carlos
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To compare two different models of public oral health in primary care services, a so-called family health strategy (FHS), as opposed to non-FHS services designated as ‘conventional’ healthcare (CHC), regarding the presence and extent of the attributes of ‘good’ primary healthcare (PHC). The null hypothesis of this study is that the attributes do not differ between the FHS and CHC. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: Public PHC services in Curitiba, the state capital of Paraná. PARTICIPANTS: PHC users of the public oral health network (n=900) and dentists active in this municipal network (n=203). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCATool)-Dentists and PCATool-Users were used to analyse the primary outcomes (‘essential’ attributes) and secondary outcomes (‘derived’ attributes) in the PHC. RESULTS: Overall, the primary care services in oral health were well evaluated, both by users and by dentists, with mean scores ascribed to PHC attributes mostly above the cut-off point (6.6). The exception for users were affiliation (6.36; 95% CI 6.11 to 6.60) and accessibility (5.83; 95% CI 5.78 to 5.89); and for dentists the accessibility (5.80; 95% CI 5.63 to 5.96). When comparing FHS and CHC, there was a superiority of the FHS model, which reached a general mean score of 7.53 (95% CI 7.48 to 7.58) among users and 7.56 (95% CI 7.45 to 7.67) among dentists; on the other hand, the CHC general mean score was of 6.61 (95% CI 6.49 to 6.73) and 6.68 (95% CI 6.56 to 6.80) respectively for users and dentists. CONCLUSIONS: The results reveal a reasonable level of attainment of PHC attributes in the services investigated. Nevertheless, public health managers should make efforts to reduce the difficulties faced by users in accessing dental care. The more positive results achieved by FHS services indicate that the provision of oral healthcare under this strategy should be expanded.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6340483
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63404832019-02-02 Assessment of public oral healthcare services in Curitiba, Brazil: a cross-sectional study using the Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCATool) Nascimento, Antonio Carlos Moysés, Simone Tetü Werneck, Renata Iani Gabardo, Marilisa Carneiro Leão Moysés, Samuel Jorge BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVES: To compare two different models of public oral health in primary care services, a so-called family health strategy (FHS), as opposed to non-FHS services designated as ‘conventional’ healthcare (CHC), regarding the presence and extent of the attributes of ‘good’ primary healthcare (PHC). The null hypothesis of this study is that the attributes do not differ between the FHS and CHC. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: Public PHC services in Curitiba, the state capital of Paraná. PARTICIPANTS: PHC users of the public oral health network (n=900) and dentists active in this municipal network (n=203). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCATool)-Dentists and PCATool-Users were used to analyse the primary outcomes (‘essential’ attributes) and secondary outcomes (‘derived’ attributes) in the PHC. RESULTS: Overall, the primary care services in oral health were well evaluated, both by users and by dentists, with mean scores ascribed to PHC attributes mostly above the cut-off point (6.6). The exception for users were affiliation (6.36; 95% CI 6.11 to 6.60) and accessibility (5.83; 95% CI 5.78 to 5.89); and for dentists the accessibility (5.80; 95% CI 5.63 to 5.96). When comparing FHS and CHC, there was a superiority of the FHS model, which reached a general mean score of 7.53 (95% CI 7.48 to 7.58) among users and 7.56 (95% CI 7.45 to 7.67) among dentists; on the other hand, the CHC general mean score was of 6.61 (95% CI 6.49 to 6.73) and 6.68 (95% CI 6.56 to 6.80) respectively for users and dentists. CONCLUSIONS: The results reveal a reasonable level of attainment of PHC attributes in the services investigated. Nevertheless, public health managers should make efforts to reduce the difficulties faced by users in accessing dental care. The more positive results achieved by FHS services indicate that the provision of oral healthcare under this strategy should be expanded. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6340483/ /pubmed/30659038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023283 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Public Health
Nascimento, Antonio Carlos
Moysés, Simone Tetü
Werneck, Renata Iani
Gabardo, Marilisa Carneiro Leão
Moysés, Samuel Jorge
Assessment of public oral healthcare services in Curitiba, Brazil: a cross-sectional study using the Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCATool)
title Assessment of public oral healthcare services in Curitiba, Brazil: a cross-sectional study using the Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCATool)
title_full Assessment of public oral healthcare services in Curitiba, Brazil: a cross-sectional study using the Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCATool)
title_fullStr Assessment of public oral healthcare services in Curitiba, Brazil: a cross-sectional study using the Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCATool)
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of public oral healthcare services in Curitiba, Brazil: a cross-sectional study using the Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCATool)
title_short Assessment of public oral healthcare services in Curitiba, Brazil: a cross-sectional study using the Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCATool)
title_sort assessment of public oral healthcare services in curitiba, brazil: a cross-sectional study using the primary care assessment tool (pcatool)
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6340483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30659038
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023283
work_keys_str_mv AT nascimentoantoniocarlos assessmentofpublicoralhealthcareservicesincuritibabrazilacrosssectionalstudyusingtheprimarycareassessmenttoolpcatool
AT moysessimonetetu assessmentofpublicoralhealthcareservicesincuritibabrazilacrosssectionalstudyusingtheprimarycareassessmenttoolpcatool
AT werneckrenataiani assessmentofpublicoralhealthcareservicesincuritibabrazilacrosssectionalstudyusingtheprimarycareassessmenttoolpcatool
AT gabardomarilisacarneiroleao assessmentofpublicoralhealthcareservicesincuritibabrazilacrosssectionalstudyusingtheprimarycareassessmenttoolpcatool
AT moysessamueljorge assessmentofpublicoralhealthcareservicesincuritibabrazilacrosssectionalstudyusingtheprimarycareassessmenttoolpcatool