Cargando…
Assessment of public oral healthcare services in Curitiba, Brazil: a cross-sectional study using the Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCATool)
OBJECTIVES: To compare two different models of public oral health in primary care services, a so-called family health strategy (FHS), as opposed to non-FHS services designated as ‘conventional’ healthcare (CHC), regarding the presence and extent of the attributes of ‘good’ primary healthcare (PHC)....
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6340483/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30659038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023283 |
_version_ | 1783388806215368704 |
---|---|
author | Nascimento, Antonio Carlos Moysés, Simone Tetü Werneck, Renata Iani Gabardo, Marilisa Carneiro Leão Moysés, Samuel Jorge |
author_facet | Nascimento, Antonio Carlos Moysés, Simone Tetü Werneck, Renata Iani Gabardo, Marilisa Carneiro Leão Moysés, Samuel Jorge |
author_sort | Nascimento, Antonio Carlos |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To compare two different models of public oral health in primary care services, a so-called family health strategy (FHS), as opposed to non-FHS services designated as ‘conventional’ healthcare (CHC), regarding the presence and extent of the attributes of ‘good’ primary healthcare (PHC). The null hypothesis of this study is that the attributes do not differ between the FHS and CHC. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: Public PHC services in Curitiba, the state capital of Paraná. PARTICIPANTS: PHC users of the public oral health network (n=900) and dentists active in this municipal network (n=203). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCATool)-Dentists and PCATool-Users were used to analyse the primary outcomes (‘essential’ attributes) and secondary outcomes (‘derived’ attributes) in the PHC. RESULTS: Overall, the primary care services in oral health were well evaluated, both by users and by dentists, with mean scores ascribed to PHC attributes mostly above the cut-off point (6.6). The exception for users were affiliation (6.36; 95% CI 6.11 to 6.60) and accessibility (5.83; 95% CI 5.78 to 5.89); and for dentists the accessibility (5.80; 95% CI 5.63 to 5.96). When comparing FHS and CHC, there was a superiority of the FHS model, which reached a general mean score of 7.53 (95% CI 7.48 to 7.58) among users and 7.56 (95% CI 7.45 to 7.67) among dentists; on the other hand, the CHC general mean score was of 6.61 (95% CI 6.49 to 6.73) and 6.68 (95% CI 6.56 to 6.80) respectively for users and dentists. CONCLUSIONS: The results reveal a reasonable level of attainment of PHC attributes in the services investigated. Nevertheless, public health managers should make efforts to reduce the difficulties faced by users in accessing dental care. The more positive results achieved by FHS services indicate that the provision of oral healthcare under this strategy should be expanded. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6340483 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63404832019-02-02 Assessment of public oral healthcare services in Curitiba, Brazil: a cross-sectional study using the Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCATool) Nascimento, Antonio Carlos Moysés, Simone Tetü Werneck, Renata Iani Gabardo, Marilisa Carneiro Leão Moysés, Samuel Jorge BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVES: To compare two different models of public oral health in primary care services, a so-called family health strategy (FHS), as opposed to non-FHS services designated as ‘conventional’ healthcare (CHC), regarding the presence and extent of the attributes of ‘good’ primary healthcare (PHC). The null hypothesis of this study is that the attributes do not differ between the FHS and CHC. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: Public PHC services in Curitiba, the state capital of Paraná. PARTICIPANTS: PHC users of the public oral health network (n=900) and dentists active in this municipal network (n=203). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCATool)-Dentists and PCATool-Users were used to analyse the primary outcomes (‘essential’ attributes) and secondary outcomes (‘derived’ attributes) in the PHC. RESULTS: Overall, the primary care services in oral health were well evaluated, both by users and by dentists, with mean scores ascribed to PHC attributes mostly above the cut-off point (6.6). The exception for users were affiliation (6.36; 95% CI 6.11 to 6.60) and accessibility (5.83; 95% CI 5.78 to 5.89); and for dentists the accessibility (5.80; 95% CI 5.63 to 5.96). When comparing FHS and CHC, there was a superiority of the FHS model, which reached a general mean score of 7.53 (95% CI 7.48 to 7.58) among users and 7.56 (95% CI 7.45 to 7.67) among dentists; on the other hand, the CHC general mean score was of 6.61 (95% CI 6.49 to 6.73) and 6.68 (95% CI 6.56 to 6.80) respectively for users and dentists. CONCLUSIONS: The results reveal a reasonable level of attainment of PHC attributes in the services investigated. Nevertheless, public health managers should make efforts to reduce the difficulties faced by users in accessing dental care. The more positive results achieved by FHS services indicate that the provision of oral healthcare under this strategy should be expanded. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6340483/ /pubmed/30659038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023283 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Public Health Nascimento, Antonio Carlos Moysés, Simone Tetü Werneck, Renata Iani Gabardo, Marilisa Carneiro Leão Moysés, Samuel Jorge Assessment of public oral healthcare services in Curitiba, Brazil: a cross-sectional study using the Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCATool) |
title | Assessment of public oral healthcare services in Curitiba, Brazil: a cross-sectional study using the Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCATool) |
title_full | Assessment of public oral healthcare services in Curitiba, Brazil: a cross-sectional study using the Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCATool) |
title_fullStr | Assessment of public oral healthcare services in Curitiba, Brazil: a cross-sectional study using the Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCATool) |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of public oral healthcare services in Curitiba, Brazil: a cross-sectional study using the Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCATool) |
title_short | Assessment of public oral healthcare services in Curitiba, Brazil: a cross-sectional study using the Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCATool) |
title_sort | assessment of public oral healthcare services in curitiba, brazil: a cross-sectional study using the primary care assessment tool (pcatool) |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6340483/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30659038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023283 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nascimentoantoniocarlos assessmentofpublicoralhealthcareservicesincuritibabrazilacrosssectionalstudyusingtheprimarycareassessmenttoolpcatool AT moysessimonetetu assessmentofpublicoralhealthcareservicesincuritibabrazilacrosssectionalstudyusingtheprimarycareassessmenttoolpcatool AT werneckrenataiani assessmentofpublicoralhealthcareservicesincuritibabrazilacrosssectionalstudyusingtheprimarycareassessmenttoolpcatool AT gabardomarilisacarneiroleao assessmentofpublicoralhealthcareservicesincuritibabrazilacrosssectionalstudyusingtheprimarycareassessmenttoolpcatool AT moysessamueljorge assessmentofpublicoralhealthcareservicesincuritibabrazilacrosssectionalstudyusingtheprimarycareassessmenttoolpcatool |