Cargando…
A Multicenter Retrospective Study of Elective Neck Dissection for T1-2N0M0 Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Analysis Using Propensity Score-Matching
BACKGROUND: This multicenter retrospective study aimed to determine whether elective neck dissection (END) can be performed for T1-2N0M0 tongue cancer. METHODS: Patients with T1-2N0M0 tongue squamous cell carcinoma who received treatment between January 2000 and December 2012 were enrolled at 14 mul...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6341049/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30515671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-07089-7 |
_version_ | 1783388882693259264 |
---|---|
author | Otsuru, Mitsunobu Ota, Yoshihide Yanamoto, Souichi Okura, Masaya Umeda, Masahiro Kirita, Tadaaki Kurita, Hiroshi Ueda, Michihiro Komori, Takahide Yamakawa, Nobuhiro Kamata, Takahiro Hasegawa, Takumi Shibahara, Takahiko Ohiro, Youichi Yamashita, Yoshihiro Noguchi, Kazuma Noguchi, Tadahide Karakida, Kazunari Naito, Hiroyuki Aikawa, Tomonao Yamashita, Tetsuro Kabata, Daijiro Shintani, Ayumi |
author_facet | Otsuru, Mitsunobu Ota, Yoshihide Yanamoto, Souichi Okura, Masaya Umeda, Masahiro Kirita, Tadaaki Kurita, Hiroshi Ueda, Michihiro Komori, Takahide Yamakawa, Nobuhiro Kamata, Takahiro Hasegawa, Takumi Shibahara, Takahiko Ohiro, Youichi Yamashita, Yoshihiro Noguchi, Kazuma Noguchi, Tadahide Karakida, Kazunari Naito, Hiroyuki Aikawa, Tomonao Yamashita, Tetsuro Kabata, Daijiro Shintani, Ayumi |
author_sort | Otsuru, Mitsunobu |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This multicenter retrospective study aimed to determine whether elective neck dissection (END) can be performed for T1-2N0M0 tongue cancer. METHODS: Patients with T1-2N0M0 tongue squamous cell carcinoma who received treatment between January 2000 and December 2012 were enrolled at 14 multicenter study sites. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) were compared between the propensity score-matched END and observation (OBS) groups. RESULTS: The results showed that the OS rates among the 1234 enrolled patients were 85.5% in the END group and 90.2% in the OBS group (P = 0.182). The DSS rates were 87.0% in the END group and 94.3% in the OBS group (P = 0.003). Among the matched patients, the OS rates were 87.1% in the END group and 76.2% in the OBS group (P = 0.0051), and the respective DSS rates were 89.2% and 82.2% (P = 0.0335). CONCLUSION: This study showed that END is beneficial for T1-2N0M0 tongue cancer. However, END should be performed for patients with a tumor depth of 4–5 mm or more, which is the depth associated with a high rate of lymph node metastasis. The use of END should be carefully considered for both elderly and young patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6341049 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63410492019-02-06 A Multicenter Retrospective Study of Elective Neck Dissection for T1-2N0M0 Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Analysis Using Propensity Score-Matching Otsuru, Mitsunobu Ota, Yoshihide Yanamoto, Souichi Okura, Masaya Umeda, Masahiro Kirita, Tadaaki Kurita, Hiroshi Ueda, Michihiro Komori, Takahide Yamakawa, Nobuhiro Kamata, Takahiro Hasegawa, Takumi Shibahara, Takahiko Ohiro, Youichi Yamashita, Yoshihiro Noguchi, Kazuma Noguchi, Tadahide Karakida, Kazunari Naito, Hiroyuki Aikawa, Tomonao Yamashita, Tetsuro Kabata, Daijiro Shintani, Ayumi Ann Surg Oncol Head and Neck Oncology BACKGROUND: This multicenter retrospective study aimed to determine whether elective neck dissection (END) can be performed for T1-2N0M0 tongue cancer. METHODS: Patients with T1-2N0M0 tongue squamous cell carcinoma who received treatment between January 2000 and December 2012 were enrolled at 14 multicenter study sites. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) were compared between the propensity score-matched END and observation (OBS) groups. RESULTS: The results showed that the OS rates among the 1234 enrolled patients were 85.5% in the END group and 90.2% in the OBS group (P = 0.182). The DSS rates were 87.0% in the END group and 94.3% in the OBS group (P = 0.003). Among the matched patients, the OS rates were 87.1% in the END group and 76.2% in the OBS group (P = 0.0051), and the respective DSS rates were 89.2% and 82.2% (P = 0.0335). CONCLUSION: This study showed that END is beneficial for T1-2N0M0 tongue cancer. However, END should be performed for patients with a tumor depth of 4–5 mm or more, which is the depth associated with a high rate of lymph node metastasis. The use of END should be carefully considered for both elderly and young patients. Springer International Publishing 2018-12-04 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6341049/ /pubmed/30515671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-07089-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Head and Neck Oncology Otsuru, Mitsunobu Ota, Yoshihide Yanamoto, Souichi Okura, Masaya Umeda, Masahiro Kirita, Tadaaki Kurita, Hiroshi Ueda, Michihiro Komori, Takahide Yamakawa, Nobuhiro Kamata, Takahiro Hasegawa, Takumi Shibahara, Takahiko Ohiro, Youichi Yamashita, Yoshihiro Noguchi, Kazuma Noguchi, Tadahide Karakida, Kazunari Naito, Hiroyuki Aikawa, Tomonao Yamashita, Tetsuro Kabata, Daijiro Shintani, Ayumi A Multicenter Retrospective Study of Elective Neck Dissection for T1-2N0M0 Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Analysis Using Propensity Score-Matching |
title | A Multicenter Retrospective Study of Elective Neck Dissection for T1-2N0M0 Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Analysis Using Propensity Score-Matching |
title_full | A Multicenter Retrospective Study of Elective Neck Dissection for T1-2N0M0 Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Analysis Using Propensity Score-Matching |
title_fullStr | A Multicenter Retrospective Study of Elective Neck Dissection for T1-2N0M0 Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Analysis Using Propensity Score-Matching |
title_full_unstemmed | A Multicenter Retrospective Study of Elective Neck Dissection for T1-2N0M0 Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Analysis Using Propensity Score-Matching |
title_short | A Multicenter Retrospective Study of Elective Neck Dissection for T1-2N0M0 Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Analysis Using Propensity Score-Matching |
title_sort | multicenter retrospective study of elective neck dissection for t1-2n0m0 tongue squamous cell carcinoma: analysis using propensity score-matching |
topic | Head and Neck Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6341049/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30515671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-07089-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT otsurumitsunobu amulticenterretrospectivestudyofelectiveneckdissectionfort12n0m0tonguesquamouscellcarcinomaanalysisusingpropensityscorematching AT otayoshihide amulticenterretrospectivestudyofelectiveneckdissectionfort12n0m0tonguesquamouscellcarcinomaanalysisusingpropensityscorematching AT yanamotosouichi amulticenterretrospectivestudyofelectiveneckdissectionfort12n0m0tonguesquamouscellcarcinomaanalysisusingpropensityscorematching AT okuramasaya amulticenterretrospectivestudyofelectiveneckdissectionfort12n0m0tonguesquamouscellcarcinomaanalysisusingpropensityscorematching AT umedamasahiro amulticenterretrospectivestudyofelectiveneckdissectionfort12n0m0tonguesquamouscellcarcinomaanalysisusingpropensityscorematching AT kiritatadaaki amulticenterretrospectivestudyofelectiveneckdissectionfort12n0m0tonguesquamouscellcarcinomaanalysisusingpropensityscorematching AT kuritahiroshi amulticenterretrospectivestudyofelectiveneckdissectionfort12n0m0tonguesquamouscellcarcinomaanalysisusingpropensityscorematching AT uedamichihiro amulticenterretrospectivestudyofelectiveneckdissectionfort12n0m0tonguesquamouscellcarcinomaanalysisusingpropensityscorematching AT komoritakahide amulticenterretrospectivestudyofelectiveneckdissectionfort12n0m0tonguesquamouscellcarcinomaanalysisusingpropensityscorematching AT yamakawanobuhiro amulticenterretrospectivestudyofelectiveneckdissectionfort12n0m0tonguesquamouscellcarcinomaanalysisusingpropensityscorematching AT kamatatakahiro amulticenterretrospectivestudyofelectiveneckdissectionfort12n0m0tonguesquamouscellcarcinomaanalysisusingpropensityscorematching AT hasegawatakumi amulticenterretrospectivestudyofelectiveneckdissectionfort12n0m0tonguesquamouscellcarcinomaanalysisusingpropensityscorematching AT shibaharatakahiko amulticenterretrospectivestudyofelectiveneckdissectionfort12n0m0tonguesquamouscellcarcinomaanalysisusingpropensityscorematching AT ohiroyouichi amulticenterretrospectivestudyofelectiveneckdissectionfort12n0m0tonguesquamouscellcarcinomaanalysisusingpropensityscorematching AT yamashitayoshihiro amulticenterretrospectivestudyofelectiveneckdissectionfort12n0m0tonguesquamouscellcarcinomaanalysisusingpropensityscorematching AT noguchikazuma amulticenterretrospectivestudyofelectiveneckdissectionfort12n0m0tonguesquamouscellcarcinomaanalysisusingpropensityscorematching AT noguchitadahide amulticenterretrospectivestudyofelectiveneckdissectionfort12n0m0tonguesquamouscellcarcinomaanalysisusingpropensityscorematching AT karakidakazunari amulticenterretrospectivestudyofelectiveneckdissectionfort12n0m0tonguesquamouscellcarcinomaanalysisusingpropensityscorematching AT naitohiroyuki amulticenterretrospectivestudyofelectiveneckdissectionfort12n0m0tonguesquamouscellcarcinomaanalysisusingpropensityscorematching AT aikawatomonao amulticenterretrospectivestudyofelectiveneckdissectionfort12n0m0tonguesquamouscellcarcinomaanalysisusingpropensityscorematching AT yamashitatetsuro amulticenterretrospectivestudyofelectiveneckdissectionfort12n0m0tonguesquamouscellcarcinomaanalysisusingpropensityscorematching AT kabatadaijiro amulticenterretrospectivestudyofelectiveneckdissectionfort12n0m0tonguesquamouscellcarcinomaanalysisusingpropensityscorematching AT shintaniayumi amulticenterretrospectivestudyofelectiveneckdissectionfort12n0m0tonguesquamouscellcarcinomaanalysisusingpropensityscorematching AT otsurumitsunobu multicenterretrospectivestudyofelectiveneckdissectionfort12n0m0tonguesquamouscellcarcinomaanalysisusingpropensityscorematching AT otayoshihide multicenterretrospectivestudyofelectiveneckdissectionfort12n0m0tonguesquamouscellcarcinomaanalysisusingpropensityscorematching AT yanamotosouichi multicenterretrospectivestudyofelectiveneckdissectionfort12n0m0tonguesquamouscellcarcinomaanalysisusingpropensityscorematching AT okuramasaya multicenterretrospectivestudyofelectiveneckdissectionfort12n0m0tonguesquamouscellcarcinomaanalysisusingpropensityscorematching AT umedamasahiro multicenterretrospectivestudyofelectiveneckdissectionfort12n0m0tonguesquamouscellcarcinomaanalysisusingpropensityscorematching AT kiritatadaaki multicenterretrospectivestudyofelectiveneckdissectionfort12n0m0tonguesquamouscellcarcinomaanalysisusingpropensityscorematching AT kuritahiroshi multicenterretrospectivestudyofelectiveneckdissectionfort12n0m0tonguesquamouscellcarcinomaanalysisusingpropensityscorematching AT uedamichihiro multicenterretrospectivestudyofelectiveneckdissectionfort12n0m0tonguesquamouscellcarcinomaanalysisusingpropensityscorematching AT komoritakahide multicenterretrospectivestudyofelectiveneckdissectionfort12n0m0tonguesquamouscellcarcinomaanalysisusingpropensityscorematching AT yamakawanobuhiro multicenterretrospectivestudyofelectiveneckdissectionfort12n0m0tonguesquamouscellcarcinomaanalysisusingpropensityscorematching AT kamatatakahiro multicenterretrospectivestudyofelectiveneckdissectionfort12n0m0tonguesquamouscellcarcinomaanalysisusingpropensityscorematching AT hasegawatakumi multicenterretrospectivestudyofelectiveneckdissectionfort12n0m0tonguesquamouscellcarcinomaanalysisusingpropensityscorematching AT shibaharatakahiko multicenterretrospectivestudyofelectiveneckdissectionfort12n0m0tonguesquamouscellcarcinomaanalysisusingpropensityscorematching AT ohiroyouichi multicenterretrospectivestudyofelectiveneckdissectionfort12n0m0tonguesquamouscellcarcinomaanalysisusingpropensityscorematching AT yamashitayoshihiro multicenterretrospectivestudyofelectiveneckdissectionfort12n0m0tonguesquamouscellcarcinomaanalysisusingpropensityscorematching AT noguchikazuma multicenterretrospectivestudyofelectiveneckdissectionfort12n0m0tonguesquamouscellcarcinomaanalysisusingpropensityscorematching AT noguchitadahide multicenterretrospectivestudyofelectiveneckdissectionfort12n0m0tonguesquamouscellcarcinomaanalysisusingpropensityscorematching AT karakidakazunari multicenterretrospectivestudyofelectiveneckdissectionfort12n0m0tonguesquamouscellcarcinomaanalysisusingpropensityscorematching AT naitohiroyuki multicenterretrospectivestudyofelectiveneckdissectionfort12n0m0tonguesquamouscellcarcinomaanalysisusingpropensityscorematching AT aikawatomonao multicenterretrospectivestudyofelectiveneckdissectionfort12n0m0tonguesquamouscellcarcinomaanalysisusingpropensityscorematching AT yamashitatetsuro multicenterretrospectivestudyofelectiveneckdissectionfort12n0m0tonguesquamouscellcarcinomaanalysisusingpropensityscorematching AT kabatadaijiro multicenterretrospectivestudyofelectiveneckdissectionfort12n0m0tonguesquamouscellcarcinomaanalysisusingpropensityscorematching AT shintaniayumi multicenterretrospectivestudyofelectiveneckdissectionfort12n0m0tonguesquamouscellcarcinomaanalysisusingpropensityscorematching |