Cargando…

Localized mammographic density is associated with interval cancer and large breast cancer: a nested case-control study

BACKGROUND: High mammographic density is associated with breast cancer and with delayed detection. We have examined whether localized density, at the site of the subsequent cancer, is independently associated with being diagnosed with a large-sized or interval breast cancer. METHODS: Within a prospe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Strand, Fredrik, Azavedo, Edward, Hellgren, Roxanna, Humphreys, Keith, Eriksson, Mikael, Shepherd, John, Hall, Per, Czene, Kamila
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6341532/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30670066
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13058-019-1099-y
_version_ 1783388958092165120
author Strand, Fredrik
Azavedo, Edward
Hellgren, Roxanna
Humphreys, Keith
Eriksson, Mikael
Shepherd, John
Hall, Per
Czene, Kamila
author_facet Strand, Fredrik
Azavedo, Edward
Hellgren, Roxanna
Humphreys, Keith
Eriksson, Mikael
Shepherd, John
Hall, Per
Czene, Kamila
author_sort Strand, Fredrik
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: High mammographic density is associated with breast cancer and with delayed detection. We have examined whether localized density, at the site of the subsequent cancer, is independently associated with being diagnosed with a large-sized or interval breast cancer. METHODS: Within a prospective cohort of 63,130 women, we examined 891 women who were diagnosed with incident breast cancer. For 386 women, retrospective localized density assessment was possible. The main outcomes were interval cancer vs. screen-detected cancer and large (> 2 cm) vs. small cancer. In negative screening mammograms, overall and localized density were classified reflecting the BI-RADS standard. Density concordance probabilities were estimated through multinomial regression. The associations between localized density and the two outcomes were modeled through logistic regression, adjusted for overall density, age, body mass index, and other characteristics. RESULTS: The probabilities of concordant localized density were 0.35, 0.60, 0.38, and 0.32 for overall categories “A,” “B,” “C,” and “D.” Overall density was associated with large cancer, comparing density category D to A with OR 4.6 (95%CI 1.8–11.6) and with interval cancer OR 31.5 (95%CI 10.9–92) among all women. Localized density was associated with large cancer at diagnosis with OR 11.8 (95%CI 2.7–51.8) among all women and associated with first-year interval cancer with OR 6.4 (0.7 to 58.7) with a significant linear trend p = 0.027. CONCLUSIONS: Overall density often misrepresents localized density at the site where cancer subsequently arises. High localized density is associated with interval cancer and with large cancer. Our findings support the continued effort to develop and examine computer-based measures of localized density for use in personalized breast cancer screening. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13058-019-1099-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6341532
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63415322019-01-24 Localized mammographic density is associated with interval cancer and large breast cancer: a nested case-control study Strand, Fredrik Azavedo, Edward Hellgren, Roxanna Humphreys, Keith Eriksson, Mikael Shepherd, John Hall, Per Czene, Kamila Breast Cancer Res Research Article BACKGROUND: High mammographic density is associated with breast cancer and with delayed detection. We have examined whether localized density, at the site of the subsequent cancer, is independently associated with being diagnosed with a large-sized or interval breast cancer. METHODS: Within a prospective cohort of 63,130 women, we examined 891 women who were diagnosed with incident breast cancer. For 386 women, retrospective localized density assessment was possible. The main outcomes were interval cancer vs. screen-detected cancer and large (> 2 cm) vs. small cancer. In negative screening mammograms, overall and localized density were classified reflecting the BI-RADS standard. Density concordance probabilities were estimated through multinomial regression. The associations between localized density and the two outcomes were modeled through logistic regression, adjusted for overall density, age, body mass index, and other characteristics. RESULTS: The probabilities of concordant localized density were 0.35, 0.60, 0.38, and 0.32 for overall categories “A,” “B,” “C,” and “D.” Overall density was associated with large cancer, comparing density category D to A with OR 4.6 (95%CI 1.8–11.6) and with interval cancer OR 31.5 (95%CI 10.9–92) among all women. Localized density was associated with large cancer at diagnosis with OR 11.8 (95%CI 2.7–51.8) among all women and associated with first-year interval cancer with OR 6.4 (0.7 to 58.7) with a significant linear trend p = 0.027. CONCLUSIONS: Overall density often misrepresents localized density at the site where cancer subsequently arises. High localized density is associated with interval cancer and with large cancer. Our findings support the continued effort to develop and examine computer-based measures of localized density for use in personalized breast cancer screening. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13058-019-1099-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-01-22 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6341532/ /pubmed/30670066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13058-019-1099-y Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Strand, Fredrik
Azavedo, Edward
Hellgren, Roxanna
Humphreys, Keith
Eriksson, Mikael
Shepherd, John
Hall, Per
Czene, Kamila
Localized mammographic density is associated with interval cancer and large breast cancer: a nested case-control study
title Localized mammographic density is associated with interval cancer and large breast cancer: a nested case-control study
title_full Localized mammographic density is associated with interval cancer and large breast cancer: a nested case-control study
title_fullStr Localized mammographic density is associated with interval cancer and large breast cancer: a nested case-control study
title_full_unstemmed Localized mammographic density is associated with interval cancer and large breast cancer: a nested case-control study
title_short Localized mammographic density is associated with interval cancer and large breast cancer: a nested case-control study
title_sort localized mammographic density is associated with interval cancer and large breast cancer: a nested case-control study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6341532/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30670066
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13058-019-1099-y
work_keys_str_mv AT strandfredrik localizedmammographicdensityisassociatedwithintervalcancerandlargebreastcanceranestedcasecontrolstudy
AT azavedoedward localizedmammographicdensityisassociatedwithintervalcancerandlargebreastcanceranestedcasecontrolstudy
AT hellgrenroxanna localizedmammographicdensityisassociatedwithintervalcancerandlargebreastcanceranestedcasecontrolstudy
AT humphreyskeith localizedmammographicdensityisassociatedwithintervalcancerandlargebreastcanceranestedcasecontrolstudy
AT erikssonmikael localizedmammographicdensityisassociatedwithintervalcancerandlargebreastcanceranestedcasecontrolstudy
AT shepherdjohn localizedmammographicdensityisassociatedwithintervalcancerandlargebreastcanceranestedcasecontrolstudy
AT hallper localizedmammographicdensityisassociatedwithintervalcancerandlargebreastcanceranestedcasecontrolstudy
AT czenekamila localizedmammographicdensityisassociatedwithintervalcancerandlargebreastcanceranestedcasecontrolstudy