Cargando…

Geographic variation in the treatment of proximal humerus fracture: an update on surgery rates and treatment consensus

BACKGROUND: Using a larger, more comprehensive sample, and inclusion of the reverse shoulder arthroplasty as a primary surgical approach for proximal humerus fracture, we report on geographic variation in the treatment of proximal humerus fracture in 2011 and comment on whether treatment consensus i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Floyd, Sarah B., Campbell, Joel, Chapman, Cole G., Thigpen, Charles A., Kissenberth, Michael J., Brooks, John M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6341604/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30665430
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-1052-2
_version_ 1783388974254915584
author Floyd, Sarah B.
Campbell, Joel
Chapman, Cole G.
Thigpen, Charles A.
Kissenberth, Michael J.
Brooks, John M.
author_facet Floyd, Sarah B.
Campbell, Joel
Chapman, Cole G.
Thigpen, Charles A.
Kissenberth, Michael J.
Brooks, John M.
author_sort Floyd, Sarah B.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Using a larger, more comprehensive sample, and inclusion of the reverse shoulder arthroplasty as a primary surgical approach for proximal humerus fracture, we report on geographic variation in the treatment of proximal humerus fracture in 2011 and comment on whether treatment consensus is being reached. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of Medicare patients with an x-ray-confirmed diagnosis of proximal humerus fracture in 2011. Patients receiving reverse shoulder arthroplasty, hemiarthroplasty, or open reduction internal fixation within 60 days of their diagnosis were classified as surgical management patients. Unadjusted observed surgery rates and area treatment ratios adjusted for patient demographic and clinical characteristics were calculated at the hospital referral region level. RESULTS: Among patients with proximal humerus fracture (N = 77,053), 15.4% received surgery and 84.6% received conservative management. Unadjusted surgery rates varied from 1.7 to 33.3% across hospital referral regions. Among patients receiving surgery, 22.3% received hemiarthroplasty, 65.8% received open reduction internal fixation, and 11.8% received reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Patients that were female, were younger, had fewer medical comorbidities, had a lower frailty index, were white, or were not dual-eligible for Medicaid during the month of their index fracture were more likely to receive surgery (p < .0001). Geographic variation in the treatment of proximal humerus fracture persisted after adjustment for patient demographic and clinical differences across local areas. Average surgery rates ranged from 9.9 to 21.2% across area treatment ratio quintiles. CONCLUSIONS: Persistent geographic variation in surgery rates for proximal humerus fracture across the USA suggests no treatment consensus has been reached.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6341604
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63416042019-01-24 Geographic variation in the treatment of proximal humerus fracture: an update on surgery rates and treatment consensus Floyd, Sarah B. Campbell, Joel Chapman, Cole G. Thigpen, Charles A. Kissenberth, Michael J. Brooks, John M. J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Using a larger, more comprehensive sample, and inclusion of the reverse shoulder arthroplasty as a primary surgical approach for proximal humerus fracture, we report on geographic variation in the treatment of proximal humerus fracture in 2011 and comment on whether treatment consensus is being reached. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of Medicare patients with an x-ray-confirmed diagnosis of proximal humerus fracture in 2011. Patients receiving reverse shoulder arthroplasty, hemiarthroplasty, or open reduction internal fixation within 60 days of their diagnosis were classified as surgical management patients. Unadjusted observed surgery rates and area treatment ratios adjusted for patient demographic and clinical characteristics were calculated at the hospital referral region level. RESULTS: Among patients with proximal humerus fracture (N = 77,053), 15.4% received surgery and 84.6% received conservative management. Unadjusted surgery rates varied from 1.7 to 33.3% across hospital referral regions. Among patients receiving surgery, 22.3% received hemiarthroplasty, 65.8% received open reduction internal fixation, and 11.8% received reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Patients that were female, were younger, had fewer medical comorbidities, had a lower frailty index, were white, or were not dual-eligible for Medicaid during the month of their index fracture were more likely to receive surgery (p < .0001). Geographic variation in the treatment of proximal humerus fracture persisted after adjustment for patient demographic and clinical differences across local areas. Average surgery rates ranged from 9.9 to 21.2% across area treatment ratio quintiles. CONCLUSIONS: Persistent geographic variation in surgery rates for proximal humerus fracture across the USA suggests no treatment consensus has been reached. BioMed Central 2019-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6341604/ /pubmed/30665430 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-1052-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Floyd, Sarah B.
Campbell, Joel
Chapman, Cole G.
Thigpen, Charles A.
Kissenberth, Michael J.
Brooks, John M.
Geographic variation in the treatment of proximal humerus fracture: an update on surgery rates and treatment consensus
title Geographic variation in the treatment of proximal humerus fracture: an update on surgery rates and treatment consensus
title_full Geographic variation in the treatment of proximal humerus fracture: an update on surgery rates and treatment consensus
title_fullStr Geographic variation in the treatment of proximal humerus fracture: an update on surgery rates and treatment consensus
title_full_unstemmed Geographic variation in the treatment of proximal humerus fracture: an update on surgery rates and treatment consensus
title_short Geographic variation in the treatment of proximal humerus fracture: an update on surgery rates and treatment consensus
title_sort geographic variation in the treatment of proximal humerus fracture: an update on surgery rates and treatment consensus
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6341604/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30665430
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-1052-2
work_keys_str_mv AT floydsarahb geographicvariationinthetreatmentofproximalhumerusfractureanupdateonsurgeryratesandtreatmentconsensus
AT campbelljoel geographicvariationinthetreatmentofproximalhumerusfractureanupdateonsurgeryratesandtreatmentconsensus
AT chapmancoleg geographicvariationinthetreatmentofproximalhumerusfractureanupdateonsurgeryratesandtreatmentconsensus
AT thigpencharlesa geographicvariationinthetreatmentofproximalhumerusfractureanupdateonsurgeryratesandtreatmentconsensus
AT kissenberthmichaelj geographicvariationinthetreatmentofproximalhumerusfractureanupdateonsurgeryratesandtreatmentconsensus
AT brooksjohnm geographicvariationinthetreatmentofproximalhumerusfractureanupdateonsurgeryratesandtreatmentconsensus