Cargando…

Too much medicine? Scientific and ethical issues from a comparison between two conflicting paradigms

BACKGROUND: The role of medicine in society appears to be focused on two views, which may be summarized as follows: “Doing more means doing better” (paradigm A) and “Doing more does not mean doing better” (paradigm B). MAIN BODY: I compared paradigms A and B both in terms of a single clinical condit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Attena, Francesco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6341674/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30669992
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6442-9
_version_ 1783388990439686144
author Attena, Francesco
author_facet Attena, Francesco
author_sort Attena, Francesco
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The role of medicine in society appears to be focused on two views, which may be summarized as follows: “Doing more means doing better” (paradigm A) and “Doing more does not mean doing better” (paradigm B). MAIN BODY: I compared paradigms A and B both in terms of a single clinical condition and in the general context of a medical system. For a single clinical condition, I analyzed breast cancer screening. There are at least seven interconnected issues that influence the conflict between paradigms A and B in the debate on breast cancer screening: disconnection between research and practice; scarcity of information given to women; how “political correctness” can influence the choice of a health policy; professional interests; doubts about effectiveness; incommensurability between harms and benefits; and the difficulty in making dichotomous decisions with discrete variables. As a general approach to medicine, the main representative of paradigm A is systems medicine. As representatives of paradigm B, I identified the following approaches or movements: choosing wisely; watchful waiting; the Too Much Medicine campaign; slow medicine; complaints against overdiagnosis; and quaternary prevention. I showed that both as a single condition and as a general approach to medicine, the comparison was entirely reducible to a harm-benefit analysis; moreover, in both cases, the two paradigms are in many respects incommensurable. This transfers the debate to the ethical level; consequently, scientists and the public have equal rights and competence to debate on this subject. Moreover, systems medicine has many ethical problems that could limit its spread. CONCLUSION: I made some hypotheses about scenarios for the future of medicine. I particularly focused on whether systems medicine would become increasingly accessible and widespread in the population or whether it would be downsized because its promises have not been maintained or ethical problems will become unsustainable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6341674
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63416742019-01-24 Too much medicine? Scientific and ethical issues from a comparison between two conflicting paradigms Attena, Francesco BMC Public Health Debate BACKGROUND: The role of medicine in society appears to be focused on two views, which may be summarized as follows: “Doing more means doing better” (paradigm A) and “Doing more does not mean doing better” (paradigm B). MAIN BODY: I compared paradigms A and B both in terms of a single clinical condition and in the general context of a medical system. For a single clinical condition, I analyzed breast cancer screening. There are at least seven interconnected issues that influence the conflict between paradigms A and B in the debate on breast cancer screening: disconnection between research and practice; scarcity of information given to women; how “political correctness” can influence the choice of a health policy; professional interests; doubts about effectiveness; incommensurability between harms and benefits; and the difficulty in making dichotomous decisions with discrete variables. As a general approach to medicine, the main representative of paradigm A is systems medicine. As representatives of paradigm B, I identified the following approaches or movements: choosing wisely; watchful waiting; the Too Much Medicine campaign; slow medicine; complaints against overdiagnosis; and quaternary prevention. I showed that both as a single condition and as a general approach to medicine, the comparison was entirely reducible to a harm-benefit analysis; moreover, in both cases, the two paradigms are in many respects incommensurable. This transfers the debate to the ethical level; consequently, scientists and the public have equal rights and competence to debate on this subject. Moreover, systems medicine has many ethical problems that could limit its spread. CONCLUSION: I made some hypotheses about scenarios for the future of medicine. I particularly focused on whether systems medicine would become increasingly accessible and widespread in the population or whether it would be downsized because its promises have not been maintained or ethical problems will become unsustainable. BioMed Central 2019-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6341674/ /pubmed/30669992 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6442-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Debate
Attena, Francesco
Too much medicine? Scientific and ethical issues from a comparison between two conflicting paradigms
title Too much medicine? Scientific and ethical issues from a comparison between two conflicting paradigms
title_full Too much medicine? Scientific and ethical issues from a comparison between two conflicting paradigms
title_fullStr Too much medicine? Scientific and ethical issues from a comparison between two conflicting paradigms
title_full_unstemmed Too much medicine? Scientific and ethical issues from a comparison between two conflicting paradigms
title_short Too much medicine? Scientific and ethical issues from a comparison between two conflicting paradigms
title_sort too much medicine? scientific and ethical issues from a comparison between two conflicting paradigms
topic Debate
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6341674/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30669992
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6442-9
work_keys_str_mv AT attenafrancesco toomuchmedicinescientificandethicalissuesfromacomparisonbetweentwoconflictingparadigms