Cargando…
Healthcare professionals’ perspectives on working conditions, leadership, and safety climate: a cross-sectional study
BACKGROUND: Promoting patient and occupational safety are two key challenges for hospitals. When aiming to improve these two outcomes synergistically, psychosocial working conditions, leadership by hospital management and supervisors, and perceptions of patient and occupational safety climate have t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6341698/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30665401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3862-7 |
_version_ | 1783388996096753664 |
---|---|
author | Wagner, Anke Rieger, Monika A. Manser, Tanja Sturm, Heidrun Hardt, Juliane Martus, Peter Lessing, Constanze Hammer, Antje |
author_facet | Wagner, Anke Rieger, Monika A. Manser, Tanja Sturm, Heidrun Hardt, Juliane Martus, Peter Lessing, Constanze Hammer, Antje |
author_sort | Wagner, Anke |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Promoting patient and occupational safety are two key challenges for hospitals. When aiming to improve these two outcomes synergistically, psychosocial working conditions, leadership by hospital management and supervisors, and perceptions of patient and occupational safety climate have to be considered. Recent studies have shown that these key topics are interrelated and form a critical foundation for promoting patient and occupational safety in hospitals. So far, these topics have mainly been studied independently from each other. The present study investigated hospital staffs’ perceptions of four different topics: (1) psychosocial working conditions, (2) leadership, (3) patient safety climate, and (4) occupational safety climate. We present results from a survey in two German university hospitals aiming to detect differences between nurses and physicians. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study using a standardized paper-based questionnaire. The survey was conducted with nurses and physicians to assess the four topics. The instruments mainly consisted of scales of the German version of the COPSOQ (Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire), one scale of the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI), scales to assess leadership and transformational leadership, scales to assess patient safety climate using the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSPSC), and analogous items to assess occupational safety climate. RESULTS: A total of 995 completed questionnaires out of 2512 distributed questionnaires were returned anonymously. The overall response rate was 39.6%. The sample consisted of 381 physicians and 567 nurses. We found various differences with regard to the four topics. In most of the COPSOQ and the HSPSC-scales, physicians rated psychosocial working conditions and patient safety climate more positively than nurses. With regard to occupational safety, nurses indicated higher occupational risks than physicians. CONCLUSIONS: The WorkSafeMed study combined the assessment of the four topics psychosocial working conditions, leadership, patient safety climate, and occupational safety climate in hospitals. Looking at the four topics provides an overview of where improvements in hospitals may be needed for nurses and physicians. Based on these results, improvements in working conditions, patient safety climate, and occupational safety climate are required for health care professionals in German university hospitals – especially for nurses. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-018-3862-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6341698 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63416982019-01-24 Healthcare professionals’ perspectives on working conditions, leadership, and safety climate: a cross-sectional study Wagner, Anke Rieger, Monika A. Manser, Tanja Sturm, Heidrun Hardt, Juliane Martus, Peter Lessing, Constanze Hammer, Antje BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Promoting patient and occupational safety are two key challenges for hospitals. When aiming to improve these two outcomes synergistically, psychosocial working conditions, leadership by hospital management and supervisors, and perceptions of patient and occupational safety climate have to be considered. Recent studies have shown that these key topics are interrelated and form a critical foundation for promoting patient and occupational safety in hospitals. So far, these topics have mainly been studied independently from each other. The present study investigated hospital staffs’ perceptions of four different topics: (1) psychosocial working conditions, (2) leadership, (3) patient safety climate, and (4) occupational safety climate. We present results from a survey in two German university hospitals aiming to detect differences between nurses and physicians. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study using a standardized paper-based questionnaire. The survey was conducted with nurses and physicians to assess the four topics. The instruments mainly consisted of scales of the German version of the COPSOQ (Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire), one scale of the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI), scales to assess leadership and transformational leadership, scales to assess patient safety climate using the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSPSC), and analogous items to assess occupational safety climate. RESULTS: A total of 995 completed questionnaires out of 2512 distributed questionnaires were returned anonymously. The overall response rate was 39.6%. The sample consisted of 381 physicians and 567 nurses. We found various differences with regard to the four topics. In most of the COPSOQ and the HSPSC-scales, physicians rated psychosocial working conditions and patient safety climate more positively than nurses. With regard to occupational safety, nurses indicated higher occupational risks than physicians. CONCLUSIONS: The WorkSafeMed study combined the assessment of the four topics psychosocial working conditions, leadership, patient safety climate, and occupational safety climate in hospitals. Looking at the four topics provides an overview of where improvements in hospitals may be needed for nurses and physicians. Based on these results, improvements in working conditions, patient safety climate, and occupational safety climate are required for health care professionals in German university hospitals – especially for nurses. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-018-3862-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6341698/ /pubmed/30665401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3862-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wagner, Anke Rieger, Monika A. Manser, Tanja Sturm, Heidrun Hardt, Juliane Martus, Peter Lessing, Constanze Hammer, Antje Healthcare professionals’ perspectives on working conditions, leadership, and safety climate: a cross-sectional study |
title | Healthcare professionals’ perspectives on working conditions, leadership, and safety climate: a cross-sectional study |
title_full | Healthcare professionals’ perspectives on working conditions, leadership, and safety climate: a cross-sectional study |
title_fullStr | Healthcare professionals’ perspectives on working conditions, leadership, and safety climate: a cross-sectional study |
title_full_unstemmed | Healthcare professionals’ perspectives on working conditions, leadership, and safety climate: a cross-sectional study |
title_short | Healthcare professionals’ perspectives on working conditions, leadership, and safety climate: a cross-sectional study |
title_sort | healthcare professionals’ perspectives on working conditions, leadership, and safety climate: a cross-sectional study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6341698/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30665401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3862-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wagneranke healthcareprofessionalsperspectivesonworkingconditionsleadershipandsafetyclimateacrosssectionalstudy AT riegermonikaa healthcareprofessionalsperspectivesonworkingconditionsleadershipandsafetyclimateacrosssectionalstudy AT mansertanja healthcareprofessionalsperspectivesonworkingconditionsleadershipandsafetyclimateacrosssectionalstudy AT sturmheidrun healthcareprofessionalsperspectivesonworkingconditionsleadershipandsafetyclimateacrosssectionalstudy AT hardtjuliane healthcareprofessionalsperspectivesonworkingconditionsleadershipandsafetyclimateacrosssectionalstudy AT martuspeter healthcareprofessionalsperspectivesonworkingconditionsleadershipandsafetyclimateacrosssectionalstudy AT lessingconstanze healthcareprofessionalsperspectivesonworkingconditionsleadershipandsafetyclimateacrosssectionalstudy AT hammerantje healthcareprofessionalsperspectivesonworkingconditionsleadershipandsafetyclimateacrosssectionalstudy AT healthcareprofessionalsperspectivesonworkingconditionsleadershipandsafetyclimateacrosssectionalstudy |