Cargando…

Examination of the Biomark assay as an alternative to Oncotype DX for defining chemotherapy benefit

Currently the 21-gene recurrence score (RS) assay called Oncotype DX is recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline for defining the benefit of chemotherapy. To overcome the cost disadvantages of the Oncotype DX assay and the turnaround time, a multigene assay was examined to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Jinkyoung, Kim, Aeree, Kim, Chungyeul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: D.A. Spandidos 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6341800/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30675242
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.9784
_version_ 1783389018232193024
author Kim, Jinkyoung
Kim, Aeree
Kim, Chungyeul
author_facet Kim, Jinkyoung
Kim, Aeree
Kim, Chungyeul
author_sort Kim, Jinkyoung
collection PubMed
description Currently the 21-gene recurrence score (RS) assay called Oncotype DX is recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline for defining the benefit of chemotherapy. To overcome the cost disadvantages of the Oncotype DX assay and the turnaround time, a multigene assay was examined to compare the correlation of the RS and the predicted score (PS) of the present study. Paraffin-embedded tissues of 50 cases with early-stage estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer, who underwent the Oncotype DX test were used. A total of 149 candidate genes with high correlation to the RS were identified, in another project (Lee et al, unpublished data). Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction biomark assays were conducted using the dynamic array integrated fluidic circuit and the correlation analysis was performed with BRB ArrayTools. A predictive model was developed by the coefficient and gene expression, and 41 genes were identified. If the cut-off was ≥18, the predicted model was 18/50 cases, and the RS was 19, indicating that the differential rate of predicted response against RS was 2%. If the cutoff was ≥11, the predicted model was 38/50 cases and the RS was 34, indicating a difference of 8%. Genes common to the Oncotype DX and the Biomark assay include marker of proliferation Ki-67, aurora kinase A, Erb-B2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2, glutathione S-transferase Mu 1, estrogen receptor 1, progesterone receptor, B-cell lymphoma 2, signal peptide CUB domain EGF-like 2 and 5 reference genes. The remaining 28 genes are involved in various pathways and functions. This result indicates that there is a significant correlation between PS and RS scores, although validation of results is required to accurately determine the risk of distant recurrence. The Biomark assay is an easy and inexpensive way to measure mRNA expression. The present study demonstrates the possibility of the Biomark assay as an alternative for defining chemotherapy benefit in individual patients with ER-positive early-stage breast cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6341800
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher D.A. Spandidos
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63418002019-01-23 Examination of the Biomark assay as an alternative to Oncotype DX for defining chemotherapy benefit Kim, Jinkyoung Kim, Aeree Kim, Chungyeul Oncol Lett Articles Currently the 21-gene recurrence score (RS) assay called Oncotype DX is recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline for defining the benefit of chemotherapy. To overcome the cost disadvantages of the Oncotype DX assay and the turnaround time, a multigene assay was examined to compare the correlation of the RS and the predicted score (PS) of the present study. Paraffin-embedded tissues of 50 cases with early-stage estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer, who underwent the Oncotype DX test were used. A total of 149 candidate genes with high correlation to the RS were identified, in another project (Lee et al, unpublished data). Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction biomark assays were conducted using the dynamic array integrated fluidic circuit and the correlation analysis was performed with BRB ArrayTools. A predictive model was developed by the coefficient and gene expression, and 41 genes were identified. If the cut-off was ≥18, the predicted model was 18/50 cases, and the RS was 19, indicating that the differential rate of predicted response against RS was 2%. If the cutoff was ≥11, the predicted model was 38/50 cases and the RS was 34, indicating a difference of 8%. Genes common to the Oncotype DX and the Biomark assay include marker of proliferation Ki-67, aurora kinase A, Erb-B2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2, glutathione S-transferase Mu 1, estrogen receptor 1, progesterone receptor, B-cell lymphoma 2, signal peptide CUB domain EGF-like 2 and 5 reference genes. The remaining 28 genes are involved in various pathways and functions. This result indicates that there is a significant correlation between PS and RS scores, although validation of results is required to accurately determine the risk of distant recurrence. The Biomark assay is an easy and inexpensive way to measure mRNA expression. The present study demonstrates the possibility of the Biomark assay as an alternative for defining chemotherapy benefit in individual patients with ER-positive early-stage breast cancer. D.A. Spandidos 2019-02 2018-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6341800/ /pubmed/30675242 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.9784 Text en Copyright: © Kim et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Articles
Kim, Jinkyoung
Kim, Aeree
Kim, Chungyeul
Examination of the Biomark assay as an alternative to Oncotype DX for defining chemotherapy benefit
title Examination of the Biomark assay as an alternative to Oncotype DX for defining chemotherapy benefit
title_full Examination of the Biomark assay as an alternative to Oncotype DX for defining chemotherapy benefit
title_fullStr Examination of the Biomark assay as an alternative to Oncotype DX for defining chemotherapy benefit
title_full_unstemmed Examination of the Biomark assay as an alternative to Oncotype DX for defining chemotherapy benefit
title_short Examination of the Biomark assay as an alternative to Oncotype DX for defining chemotherapy benefit
title_sort examination of the biomark assay as an alternative to oncotype dx for defining chemotherapy benefit
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6341800/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30675242
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.9784
work_keys_str_mv AT kimjinkyoung examinationofthebiomarkassayasanalternativetooncotypedxfordefiningchemotherapybenefit
AT kimaeree examinationofthebiomarkassayasanalternativetooncotypedxfordefiningchemotherapybenefit
AT kimchungyeul examinationofthebiomarkassayasanalternativetooncotypedxfordefiningchemotherapybenefit