Cargando…

Ecological correlates of Himalayan musk deer Moschus leucogaster

Himalayan musk deer (Moschus leucogaster; hereafter musk deer) are endangered as a result of poaching and habitat loss. The species is nocturnal, crepuscular, and elusive, making direct observation of habitat use and behavior difficult. However, musk deer establish and repeatedly use the same latrin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Singh, Paras Bikram, Saud, Pradip, Cram, Douglas, Mainali, Kumar, Thapa, Arjun, Chhetri, Nar Bahadur, Poudyal, Laxman Prasad, Baral, Hem Sagar, Jiang, Zhigang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6342099/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30680091
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4435
_version_ 1783389069875609600
author Singh, Paras Bikram
Saud, Pradip
Cram, Douglas
Mainali, Kumar
Thapa, Arjun
Chhetri, Nar Bahadur
Poudyal, Laxman Prasad
Baral, Hem Sagar
Jiang, Zhigang
author_facet Singh, Paras Bikram
Saud, Pradip
Cram, Douglas
Mainali, Kumar
Thapa, Arjun
Chhetri, Nar Bahadur
Poudyal, Laxman Prasad
Baral, Hem Sagar
Jiang, Zhigang
author_sort Singh, Paras Bikram
collection PubMed
description Himalayan musk deer (Moschus leucogaster; hereafter musk deer) are endangered as a result of poaching and habitat loss. The species is nocturnal, crepuscular, and elusive, making direct observation of habitat use and behavior difficult. However, musk deer establish and repeatedly use the same latrines for defecation. To quantify musk deer habitat correlates, we used observational spatial data based on presence–absence of musk deer latrines, as well as a range of fine spatial‐scale ecological covariates. To determine presence–absence of musk deer, we exhaustively searched randomly selected forest trails using a 20‐m belt transect in different study sites within the Neshyang Valley in the Annapurna Conservation Area. In a subsequent way, study sites were classified as habitat or nonhabitat for musk deer. A total of 252 plots, 20 × 20 m, were systematically established every 100 m along 51 transects (each ~0.5 km long) laid out at different elevations to record a range of ecological habitat variables. We used mixed‐effect models and principal component analysis to characterize relationships between deer presence–absence data and habitat variables. We confirmed musk deer use latrines in forests located at higher elevations (3,200–4,200 m) throughout multiple seasons and years. Himalayan birch (Betula utilis) dominated forest, mixed Himalayan fir (Abies spectabilis), and birch forest were preferred over pure Himalayan fir and blue pine (Pinus wallichiana) forest. Greater crown cover and shrub diversity were associated with the presence of musk deer whereas tree height, diameter, and diversity were weakly correlated. Topographical attributes including aspect, elevation, distance to water source, and slope were also discriminated by musk deer. Over‐ and understory forest management can be used to protect forests likely to have musk deer as predicted by the models to ensure long‐term conservation of this rare deer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6342099
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63420992019-01-24 Ecological correlates of Himalayan musk deer Moschus leucogaster Singh, Paras Bikram Saud, Pradip Cram, Douglas Mainali, Kumar Thapa, Arjun Chhetri, Nar Bahadur Poudyal, Laxman Prasad Baral, Hem Sagar Jiang, Zhigang Ecol Evol Original Research Himalayan musk deer (Moschus leucogaster; hereafter musk deer) are endangered as a result of poaching and habitat loss. The species is nocturnal, crepuscular, and elusive, making direct observation of habitat use and behavior difficult. However, musk deer establish and repeatedly use the same latrines for defecation. To quantify musk deer habitat correlates, we used observational spatial data based on presence–absence of musk deer latrines, as well as a range of fine spatial‐scale ecological covariates. To determine presence–absence of musk deer, we exhaustively searched randomly selected forest trails using a 20‐m belt transect in different study sites within the Neshyang Valley in the Annapurna Conservation Area. In a subsequent way, study sites were classified as habitat or nonhabitat for musk deer. A total of 252 plots, 20 × 20 m, were systematically established every 100 m along 51 transects (each ~0.5 km long) laid out at different elevations to record a range of ecological habitat variables. We used mixed‐effect models and principal component analysis to characterize relationships between deer presence–absence data and habitat variables. We confirmed musk deer use latrines in forests located at higher elevations (3,200–4,200 m) throughout multiple seasons and years. Himalayan birch (Betula utilis) dominated forest, mixed Himalayan fir (Abies spectabilis), and birch forest were preferred over pure Himalayan fir and blue pine (Pinus wallichiana) forest. Greater crown cover and shrub diversity were associated with the presence of musk deer whereas tree height, diameter, and diversity were weakly correlated. Topographical attributes including aspect, elevation, distance to water source, and slope were also discriminated by musk deer. Over‐ and understory forest management can be used to protect forests likely to have musk deer as predicted by the models to ensure long‐term conservation of this rare deer. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6342099/ /pubmed/30680091 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4435 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Singh, Paras Bikram
Saud, Pradip
Cram, Douglas
Mainali, Kumar
Thapa, Arjun
Chhetri, Nar Bahadur
Poudyal, Laxman Prasad
Baral, Hem Sagar
Jiang, Zhigang
Ecological correlates of Himalayan musk deer Moschus leucogaster
title Ecological correlates of Himalayan musk deer Moschus leucogaster
title_full Ecological correlates of Himalayan musk deer Moschus leucogaster
title_fullStr Ecological correlates of Himalayan musk deer Moschus leucogaster
title_full_unstemmed Ecological correlates of Himalayan musk deer Moschus leucogaster
title_short Ecological correlates of Himalayan musk deer Moschus leucogaster
title_sort ecological correlates of himalayan musk deer moschus leucogaster
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6342099/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30680091
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4435
work_keys_str_mv AT singhparasbikram ecologicalcorrelatesofhimalayanmuskdeermoschusleucogaster
AT saudpradip ecologicalcorrelatesofhimalayanmuskdeermoschusleucogaster
AT cramdouglas ecologicalcorrelatesofhimalayanmuskdeermoschusleucogaster
AT mainalikumar ecologicalcorrelatesofhimalayanmuskdeermoschusleucogaster
AT thapaarjun ecologicalcorrelatesofhimalayanmuskdeermoschusleucogaster
AT chhetrinarbahadur ecologicalcorrelatesofhimalayanmuskdeermoschusleucogaster
AT poudyallaxmanprasad ecologicalcorrelatesofhimalayanmuskdeermoschusleucogaster
AT baralhemsagar ecologicalcorrelatesofhimalayanmuskdeermoschusleucogaster
AT jiangzhigang ecologicalcorrelatesofhimalayanmuskdeermoschusleucogaster