Cargando…

Potential of a no‐take marine reserve to protect home ranges of anadromous brown trout (Salmo trutta)

The extent to which no‐take marine reserves can benefit anadromous species requires examination. Here, we used acoustic telemetry to investigate the spatial behavior of anadromous brown trout (sea trout, Salmo trutta) in relation to a small marine reserve (~1.5 km(2)) located inside a fjord on the N...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thorbjørnsen, Susanna Huneide, Moland, Even, Simpfendorfer, Colin, Heupel, Michelle, Knutsen, Halvor, Olsen, Esben Moland
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6342106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30680124
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4760
_version_ 1783389071512436736
author Thorbjørnsen, Susanna Huneide
Moland, Even
Simpfendorfer, Colin
Heupel, Michelle
Knutsen, Halvor
Olsen, Esben Moland
author_facet Thorbjørnsen, Susanna Huneide
Moland, Even
Simpfendorfer, Colin
Heupel, Michelle
Knutsen, Halvor
Olsen, Esben Moland
author_sort Thorbjørnsen, Susanna Huneide
collection PubMed
description The extent to which no‐take marine reserves can benefit anadromous species requires examination. Here, we used acoustic telemetry to investigate the spatial behavior of anadromous brown trout (sea trout, Salmo trutta) in relation to a small marine reserve (~1.5 km(2)) located inside a fjord on the Norwegian Skagerrak coast. On average, sea trout spent 42.3 % (±5.0% SE) of their time in the fjord within the reserve, a proportion similar to the area of the reserve relative to that of the fjord. On average, sea trout tagged inside the reserve received the most protection, although the level of protection decreased marginally with increasing home range size. Furthermore, individuals tagged outside the reserve received more protection with increasing home range size, potentially opposing selection toward smaller home range sizes inflicted on fish residing within reserves, or through selective fishing methods like angling. Monthly sea trout home ranges in the marine environment were on average smaller than the reserve, with a mean of 0.430 (±0.0265 SE) km(2). Hence, the reserve is large enough to protect the full home range of some individuals residing in the reserve. Synthesis and applications: In general, the reserve protects sea trout to a varying degree depending on their individual behavior. These findings highlight evolutionary implications of spatial protection and can guide managers in the design of marine reserves and networks that preserve variation in target species' home range size and movement behavior.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6342106
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63421062019-01-24 Potential of a no‐take marine reserve to protect home ranges of anadromous brown trout (Salmo trutta) Thorbjørnsen, Susanna Huneide Moland, Even Simpfendorfer, Colin Heupel, Michelle Knutsen, Halvor Olsen, Esben Moland Ecol Evol Original Research The extent to which no‐take marine reserves can benefit anadromous species requires examination. Here, we used acoustic telemetry to investigate the spatial behavior of anadromous brown trout (sea trout, Salmo trutta) in relation to a small marine reserve (~1.5 km(2)) located inside a fjord on the Norwegian Skagerrak coast. On average, sea trout spent 42.3 % (±5.0% SE) of their time in the fjord within the reserve, a proportion similar to the area of the reserve relative to that of the fjord. On average, sea trout tagged inside the reserve received the most protection, although the level of protection decreased marginally with increasing home range size. Furthermore, individuals tagged outside the reserve received more protection with increasing home range size, potentially opposing selection toward smaller home range sizes inflicted on fish residing within reserves, or through selective fishing methods like angling. Monthly sea trout home ranges in the marine environment were on average smaller than the reserve, with a mean of 0.430 (±0.0265 SE) km(2). Hence, the reserve is large enough to protect the full home range of some individuals residing in the reserve. Synthesis and applications: In general, the reserve protects sea trout to a varying degree depending on their individual behavior. These findings highlight evolutionary implications of spatial protection and can guide managers in the design of marine reserves and networks that preserve variation in target species' home range size and movement behavior. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6342106/ /pubmed/30680124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4760 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Thorbjørnsen, Susanna Huneide
Moland, Even
Simpfendorfer, Colin
Heupel, Michelle
Knutsen, Halvor
Olsen, Esben Moland
Potential of a no‐take marine reserve to protect home ranges of anadromous brown trout (Salmo trutta)
title Potential of a no‐take marine reserve to protect home ranges of anadromous brown trout (Salmo trutta)
title_full Potential of a no‐take marine reserve to protect home ranges of anadromous brown trout (Salmo trutta)
title_fullStr Potential of a no‐take marine reserve to protect home ranges of anadromous brown trout (Salmo trutta)
title_full_unstemmed Potential of a no‐take marine reserve to protect home ranges of anadromous brown trout (Salmo trutta)
title_short Potential of a no‐take marine reserve to protect home ranges of anadromous brown trout (Salmo trutta)
title_sort potential of a no‐take marine reserve to protect home ranges of anadromous brown trout (salmo trutta)
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6342106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30680124
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4760
work_keys_str_mv AT thorbjørnsensusannahuneide potentialofanotakemarinereservetoprotecthomerangesofanadromousbrowntroutsalmotrutta
AT molandeven potentialofanotakemarinereservetoprotecthomerangesofanadromousbrowntroutsalmotrutta
AT simpfendorfercolin potentialofanotakemarinereservetoprotecthomerangesofanadromousbrowntroutsalmotrutta
AT heupelmichelle potentialofanotakemarinereservetoprotecthomerangesofanadromousbrowntroutsalmotrutta
AT knutsenhalvor potentialofanotakemarinereservetoprotecthomerangesofanadromousbrowntroutsalmotrutta
AT olsenesbenmoland potentialofanotakemarinereservetoprotecthomerangesofanadromousbrowntroutsalmotrutta