Cargando…

Social effects on fruit fly courtship song

Courtship behavior in Drosophila has often been described as a classic innate behavioral repertoire, but more recently extensive plasticity has been described. In particular, prior exposure to acoustic signals of con‐ or heterspecific males can change courtship traits in both sexes that are liable t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marie‐Orleach, Lucas, Bailey, Nathan W., Ritchie, Michael G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6342107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30680123
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4759
_version_ 1783389071763046400
author Marie‐Orleach, Lucas
Bailey, Nathan W.
Ritchie, Michael G.
author_facet Marie‐Orleach, Lucas
Bailey, Nathan W.
Ritchie, Michael G.
author_sort Marie‐Orleach, Lucas
collection PubMed
description Courtship behavior in Drosophila has often been described as a classic innate behavioral repertoire, but more recently extensive plasticity has been described. In particular, prior exposure to acoustic signals of con‐ or heterspecific males can change courtship traits in both sexes that are liable to be important in reproductive isolation. However, it is unknown whether male courtship song itself is socially plastic. We examined courtship song plasticity of two species in the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup. Sexual isolation between the species is influenced by two male song traits, the interpulse interval (IPI) and sinesong frequency (SSF). Neither of these showed plasticity when males had prior experience of con‐ and heterospecific social partners. However, males of both species produced longer bursts of song during courtship when they were exposed to social partners (either con‐ or heterospecific) than when they were reared in isolation. D. melanogaster carrying mutations affecting short‐ or medium‐term memory showed a similar response to the social environment, not supporting a role for learning. Our results demonstrate that the amount of song a male produces during courtship is plastic depending on the social environment, which might reflect the advantage of being able to respond to variation in intrasexual competition, but that song structure itself is relatively inflexible, perhaps due to strong selection against hybridization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6342107
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63421072019-01-24 Social effects on fruit fly courtship song Marie‐Orleach, Lucas Bailey, Nathan W. Ritchie, Michael G. Ecol Evol Original Research Courtship behavior in Drosophila has often been described as a classic innate behavioral repertoire, but more recently extensive plasticity has been described. In particular, prior exposure to acoustic signals of con‐ or heterspecific males can change courtship traits in both sexes that are liable to be important in reproductive isolation. However, it is unknown whether male courtship song itself is socially plastic. We examined courtship song plasticity of two species in the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup. Sexual isolation between the species is influenced by two male song traits, the interpulse interval (IPI) and sinesong frequency (SSF). Neither of these showed plasticity when males had prior experience of con‐ and heterospecific social partners. However, males of both species produced longer bursts of song during courtship when they were exposed to social partners (either con‐ or heterospecific) than when they were reared in isolation. D. melanogaster carrying mutations affecting short‐ or medium‐term memory showed a similar response to the social environment, not supporting a role for learning. Our results demonstrate that the amount of song a male produces during courtship is plastic depending on the social environment, which might reflect the advantage of being able to respond to variation in intrasexual competition, but that song structure itself is relatively inflexible, perhaps due to strong selection against hybridization. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6342107/ /pubmed/30680123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4759 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Marie‐Orleach, Lucas
Bailey, Nathan W.
Ritchie, Michael G.
Social effects on fruit fly courtship song
title Social effects on fruit fly courtship song
title_full Social effects on fruit fly courtship song
title_fullStr Social effects on fruit fly courtship song
title_full_unstemmed Social effects on fruit fly courtship song
title_short Social effects on fruit fly courtship song
title_sort social effects on fruit fly courtship song
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6342107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30680123
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4759
work_keys_str_mv AT marieorleachlucas socialeffectsonfruitflycourtshipsong
AT baileynathanw socialeffectsonfruitflycourtshipsong
AT ritchiemichaelg socialeffectsonfruitflycourtshipsong