Cargando…
Social effects on fruit fly courtship song
Courtship behavior in Drosophila has often been described as a classic innate behavioral repertoire, but more recently extensive plasticity has been described. In particular, prior exposure to acoustic signals of con‐ or heterspecific males can change courtship traits in both sexes that are liable t...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6342107/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30680123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4759 |
_version_ | 1783389071763046400 |
---|---|
author | Marie‐Orleach, Lucas Bailey, Nathan W. Ritchie, Michael G. |
author_facet | Marie‐Orleach, Lucas Bailey, Nathan W. Ritchie, Michael G. |
author_sort | Marie‐Orleach, Lucas |
collection | PubMed |
description | Courtship behavior in Drosophila has often been described as a classic innate behavioral repertoire, but more recently extensive plasticity has been described. In particular, prior exposure to acoustic signals of con‐ or heterspecific males can change courtship traits in both sexes that are liable to be important in reproductive isolation. However, it is unknown whether male courtship song itself is socially plastic. We examined courtship song plasticity of two species in the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup. Sexual isolation between the species is influenced by two male song traits, the interpulse interval (IPI) and sinesong frequency (SSF). Neither of these showed plasticity when males had prior experience of con‐ and heterospecific social partners. However, males of both species produced longer bursts of song during courtship when they were exposed to social partners (either con‐ or heterospecific) than when they were reared in isolation. D. melanogaster carrying mutations affecting short‐ or medium‐term memory showed a similar response to the social environment, not supporting a role for learning. Our results demonstrate that the amount of song a male produces during courtship is plastic depending on the social environment, which might reflect the advantage of being able to respond to variation in intrasexual competition, but that song structure itself is relatively inflexible, perhaps due to strong selection against hybridization. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6342107 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63421072019-01-24 Social effects on fruit fly courtship song Marie‐Orleach, Lucas Bailey, Nathan W. Ritchie, Michael G. Ecol Evol Original Research Courtship behavior in Drosophila has often been described as a classic innate behavioral repertoire, but more recently extensive plasticity has been described. In particular, prior exposure to acoustic signals of con‐ or heterspecific males can change courtship traits in both sexes that are liable to be important in reproductive isolation. However, it is unknown whether male courtship song itself is socially plastic. We examined courtship song plasticity of two species in the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup. Sexual isolation between the species is influenced by two male song traits, the interpulse interval (IPI) and sinesong frequency (SSF). Neither of these showed plasticity when males had prior experience of con‐ and heterospecific social partners. However, males of both species produced longer bursts of song during courtship when they were exposed to social partners (either con‐ or heterospecific) than when they were reared in isolation. D. melanogaster carrying mutations affecting short‐ or medium‐term memory showed a similar response to the social environment, not supporting a role for learning. Our results demonstrate that the amount of song a male produces during courtship is plastic depending on the social environment, which might reflect the advantage of being able to respond to variation in intrasexual competition, but that song structure itself is relatively inflexible, perhaps due to strong selection against hybridization. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6342107/ /pubmed/30680123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4759 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Marie‐Orleach, Lucas Bailey, Nathan W. Ritchie, Michael G. Social effects on fruit fly courtship song |
title | Social effects on fruit fly courtship song |
title_full | Social effects on fruit fly courtship song |
title_fullStr | Social effects on fruit fly courtship song |
title_full_unstemmed | Social effects on fruit fly courtship song |
title_short | Social effects on fruit fly courtship song |
title_sort | social effects on fruit fly courtship song |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6342107/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30680123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4759 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marieorleachlucas socialeffectsonfruitflycourtshipsong AT baileynathanw socialeffectsonfruitflycourtshipsong AT ritchiemichaelg socialeffectsonfruitflycourtshipsong |