Cargando…

The early‐life environment and individual plasticity in life‐history traits

We tested whether the early‐life environment can influence the extent of individual plasticity in a life‐history trait. We asked: can the early‐life environment explain why, in response to the same adult environmental cue, some individuals invest more than others in current reproduction? Moreover, c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Gasperin, Ornela, Duarte, Ana, English, Sinead, Attisano, Alfredo, Kilner, Rebecca M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6342119/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30680118
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4749
_version_ 1783389074602590208
author De Gasperin, Ornela
Duarte, Ana
English, Sinead
Attisano, Alfredo
Kilner, Rebecca M.
author_facet De Gasperin, Ornela
Duarte, Ana
English, Sinead
Attisano, Alfredo
Kilner, Rebecca M.
author_sort De Gasperin, Ornela
collection PubMed
description We tested whether the early‐life environment can influence the extent of individual plasticity in a life‐history trait. We asked: can the early‐life environment explain why, in response to the same adult environmental cue, some individuals invest more than others in current reproduction? Moreover, can it additionally explain why investment in current reproduction trades off against survival in some individuals, but is positively correlated with survival in others? We addressed these questions using the burying beetle, which breeds on small carcasses and sometimes carries phoretic mites. These mites breed alongside the beetle, on the same resource, and are a key component of the beetle's early‐life environment. We exposed female beetles to mites twice during their lives: during their development as larvae and again as adults during their first reproductive event. We measured investment in current reproduction by quantifying average larval mass and recorded the female's life span after breeding to quantify survival. We found no effect of either developing or breeding alongside mites on female reproductive investment, nor on her life span, nor did developing alongside mites influence her size. In post hoc analyses, where we considered the effect of mite number (rather than their mere presence/absence) during the female's adult breeding event, we found that females invested more in current reproduction when exposed to greater mite densities during reproduction, but only if they had been exposed to mites during development as well. Otherwise, they invested less in larvae at greater mite densities. Furthermore, females that had developed with mites exhibited a trade‐off between investment in current reproduction and future survival, whereas these traits were positively correlated in females that had developed without mites. The early‐life environment thus generates individual variation in life‐history plasticity. We discuss whether this is because mites influence the resources available to developing young or serve as important environmental cues.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6342119
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63421192019-01-24 The early‐life environment and individual plasticity in life‐history traits De Gasperin, Ornela Duarte, Ana English, Sinead Attisano, Alfredo Kilner, Rebecca M. Ecol Evol Original Research We tested whether the early‐life environment can influence the extent of individual plasticity in a life‐history trait. We asked: can the early‐life environment explain why, in response to the same adult environmental cue, some individuals invest more than others in current reproduction? Moreover, can it additionally explain why investment in current reproduction trades off against survival in some individuals, but is positively correlated with survival in others? We addressed these questions using the burying beetle, which breeds on small carcasses and sometimes carries phoretic mites. These mites breed alongside the beetle, on the same resource, and are a key component of the beetle's early‐life environment. We exposed female beetles to mites twice during their lives: during their development as larvae and again as adults during their first reproductive event. We measured investment in current reproduction by quantifying average larval mass and recorded the female's life span after breeding to quantify survival. We found no effect of either developing or breeding alongside mites on female reproductive investment, nor on her life span, nor did developing alongside mites influence her size. In post hoc analyses, where we considered the effect of mite number (rather than their mere presence/absence) during the female's adult breeding event, we found that females invested more in current reproduction when exposed to greater mite densities during reproduction, but only if they had been exposed to mites during development as well. Otherwise, they invested less in larvae at greater mite densities. Furthermore, females that had developed with mites exhibited a trade‐off between investment in current reproduction and future survival, whereas these traits were positively correlated in females that had developed without mites. The early‐life environment thus generates individual variation in life‐history plasticity. We discuss whether this is because mites influence the resources available to developing young or serve as important environmental cues. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6342119/ /pubmed/30680118 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4749 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
De Gasperin, Ornela
Duarte, Ana
English, Sinead
Attisano, Alfredo
Kilner, Rebecca M.
The early‐life environment and individual plasticity in life‐history traits
title The early‐life environment and individual plasticity in life‐history traits
title_full The early‐life environment and individual plasticity in life‐history traits
title_fullStr The early‐life environment and individual plasticity in life‐history traits
title_full_unstemmed The early‐life environment and individual plasticity in life‐history traits
title_short The early‐life environment and individual plasticity in life‐history traits
title_sort early‐life environment and individual plasticity in life‐history traits
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6342119/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30680118
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4749
work_keys_str_mv AT degasperinornela theearlylifeenvironmentandindividualplasticityinlifehistorytraits
AT duarteana theearlylifeenvironmentandindividualplasticityinlifehistorytraits
AT englishsinead theearlylifeenvironmentandindividualplasticityinlifehistorytraits
AT attisanoalfredo theearlylifeenvironmentandindividualplasticityinlifehistorytraits
AT kilnerrebeccam theearlylifeenvironmentandindividualplasticityinlifehistorytraits
AT degasperinornela earlylifeenvironmentandindividualplasticityinlifehistorytraits
AT duarteana earlylifeenvironmentandindividualplasticityinlifehistorytraits
AT englishsinead earlylifeenvironmentandindividualplasticityinlifehistorytraits
AT attisanoalfredo earlylifeenvironmentandindividualplasticityinlifehistorytraits
AT kilnerrebeccam earlylifeenvironmentandindividualplasticityinlifehistorytraits