Cargando…

Electromyographic comparison of the barbell deadlift using constant versus variable resistance in healthy, trained men

Variable, external resistance is proposed to increasingly augment the muscular stress throughout a dynamic movement. However, it is uncertain how different levels of variable resistance affect the activation in the deadlift. The aim of the study was to compare the electromyographic activity of the g...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Andersen, Vidar, Fimland, Marius S., Mo, Dag-Andrè, Iversen, Vegard M., Larsen, Tommy M., Solheim, Fredrik, Saeterbakken, Atle H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6342300/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30668589
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211021
_version_ 1783389102648852480
author Andersen, Vidar
Fimland, Marius S.
Mo, Dag-Andrè
Iversen, Vegard M.
Larsen, Tommy M.
Solheim, Fredrik
Saeterbakken, Atle H.
author_facet Andersen, Vidar
Fimland, Marius S.
Mo, Dag-Andrè
Iversen, Vegard M.
Larsen, Tommy M.
Solheim, Fredrik
Saeterbakken, Atle H.
author_sort Andersen, Vidar
collection PubMed
description Variable, external resistance is proposed to increasingly augment the muscular stress throughout a dynamic movement. However, it is uncertain how different levels of variable resistance affect the activation in the deadlift. The aim of the study was to compare the electromyographic activity of the gluteus maximus, biceps femoris, semitendinosus, vastus lateralis and erector spinae muscles during the barbell deadlift with free weights (FW) alone, with two (FW-2EB), and four elastic bands (FW-4EB) to deload some of the constant external resistance. Fifteen resistance-trained men participated in a cross-over design where resistance loadings were matched using two-repetition maximum loadings in the three different conditions. For the whole movement, both repetitions were analyzed. For the phase-specific analysis, the last repetition was divided into six parts, i.e. the lower, middle and upper phase in both the ascending and descending phase of the movement. The mean deloading contributions from FW-2EB and FW-4EB were 21% and 41%, respectively. In FW-4EB, the erector spinae was activated more in the whole movement (8%, ES = 0.31, p = 0.002) compared to FW-2EB. There was also a tendency towards higher activation in FW-4EB versus FW for the whole movement (5%, ES = 0.18, p = 0.072). There were no significant differences between the conditions in any of the other phases or muscles (p = 0.106–0.926). In summary, a high contribution from variable, external resistance seems to activate the back extensors more than a low contribution.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6342300
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63423002019-02-01 Electromyographic comparison of the barbell deadlift using constant versus variable resistance in healthy, trained men Andersen, Vidar Fimland, Marius S. Mo, Dag-Andrè Iversen, Vegard M. Larsen, Tommy M. Solheim, Fredrik Saeterbakken, Atle H. PLoS One Research Article Variable, external resistance is proposed to increasingly augment the muscular stress throughout a dynamic movement. However, it is uncertain how different levels of variable resistance affect the activation in the deadlift. The aim of the study was to compare the electromyographic activity of the gluteus maximus, biceps femoris, semitendinosus, vastus lateralis and erector spinae muscles during the barbell deadlift with free weights (FW) alone, with two (FW-2EB), and four elastic bands (FW-4EB) to deload some of the constant external resistance. Fifteen resistance-trained men participated in a cross-over design where resistance loadings were matched using two-repetition maximum loadings in the three different conditions. For the whole movement, both repetitions were analyzed. For the phase-specific analysis, the last repetition was divided into six parts, i.e. the lower, middle and upper phase in both the ascending and descending phase of the movement. The mean deloading contributions from FW-2EB and FW-4EB were 21% and 41%, respectively. In FW-4EB, the erector spinae was activated more in the whole movement (8%, ES = 0.31, p = 0.002) compared to FW-2EB. There was also a tendency towards higher activation in FW-4EB versus FW for the whole movement (5%, ES = 0.18, p = 0.072). There were no significant differences between the conditions in any of the other phases or muscles (p = 0.106–0.926). In summary, a high contribution from variable, external resistance seems to activate the back extensors more than a low contribution. Public Library of Science 2019-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6342300/ /pubmed/30668589 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211021 Text en © 2019 Andersen et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Andersen, Vidar
Fimland, Marius S.
Mo, Dag-Andrè
Iversen, Vegard M.
Larsen, Tommy M.
Solheim, Fredrik
Saeterbakken, Atle H.
Electromyographic comparison of the barbell deadlift using constant versus variable resistance in healthy, trained men
title Electromyographic comparison of the barbell deadlift using constant versus variable resistance in healthy, trained men
title_full Electromyographic comparison of the barbell deadlift using constant versus variable resistance in healthy, trained men
title_fullStr Electromyographic comparison of the barbell deadlift using constant versus variable resistance in healthy, trained men
title_full_unstemmed Electromyographic comparison of the barbell deadlift using constant versus variable resistance in healthy, trained men
title_short Electromyographic comparison of the barbell deadlift using constant versus variable resistance in healthy, trained men
title_sort electromyographic comparison of the barbell deadlift using constant versus variable resistance in healthy, trained men
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6342300/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30668589
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211021
work_keys_str_mv AT andersenvidar electromyographiccomparisonofthebarbelldeadliftusingconstantversusvariableresistanceinhealthytrainedmen
AT fimlandmariuss electromyographiccomparisonofthebarbelldeadliftusingconstantversusvariableresistanceinhealthytrainedmen
AT modagandre electromyographiccomparisonofthebarbelldeadliftusingconstantversusvariableresistanceinhealthytrainedmen
AT iversenvegardm electromyographiccomparisonofthebarbelldeadliftusingconstantversusvariableresistanceinhealthytrainedmen
AT larsentommym electromyographiccomparisonofthebarbelldeadliftusingconstantversusvariableresistanceinhealthytrainedmen
AT solheimfredrik electromyographiccomparisonofthebarbelldeadliftusingconstantversusvariableresistanceinhealthytrainedmen
AT saeterbakkenatleh electromyographiccomparisonofthebarbelldeadliftusingconstantversusvariableresistanceinhealthytrainedmen