Cargando…

ENDS retailers and marketing near university campuses with and without tobacco-free policies

INTRODUCTION: This study characterizes the retail environment for Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS) near public universities in California, assesses marketing in the first random sample of ENDS retailers, and compares ENDS retailer density and retail marketing near campuses with and withou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barker, Dianne C., Schleicher, Nina C., Ababseh, Kimberly, Johnson, Trent O., Henriksen, Lisa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: European Publishing on behalf of the International Society for the Prevention of Tobacco Induced Diseases (ISPTID) 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6342456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30687532
http://dx.doi.org/10.18332/tid/94600
_version_ 1783389137831723008
author Barker, Dianne C.
Schleicher, Nina C.
Ababseh, Kimberly
Johnson, Trent O.
Henriksen, Lisa
author_facet Barker, Dianne C.
Schleicher, Nina C.
Ababseh, Kimberly
Johnson, Trent O.
Henriksen, Lisa
author_sort Barker, Dianne C.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: This study characterizes the retail environment for Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS) near public universities in California, assesses marketing in the first random sample of ENDS retailers, and compares ENDS retailer density and retail marketing near campuses with and without tobacco-free policies. METHODS: Two data sources were used to construct a sampling frame of possible ENDS retailers, which were mapped within 1–4 miles of 33 campuses of the University of California and the California State University systems. To assess retailer density, a telephone survey of possible ENDS retailers (n=1186) determined who sold e-cigarettes or e-liquids (completion rate=72.9%). To assess retail marketing, trained data collectors completed observations in a random sample (n=438, mean M=13.3 stores per campus, SD=11.2) in the Fall of 2015 RESULTS: In a telephone survey, 59.1% of retailers reported selling e-cigarettes or e-liquids. Half of the campuses had 10 or more ENDS retailers nearby. Most ENDS retailers were convenience stores (42.5%), and more were head shops (8.4%) than smoke shops (6.8%) or vape shops (6.2%). Nearly half (43.6%) of ENDS retailers sold products marketed as zero-nicotine and 13.9% sold NRT. ENDS advertising was visible in 72.4% and on the exterior of 28.1% of retailers. However, the presence of exterior advertising for ENDS was significantly lower near campuses with established tobacco-free policies than near campuses with recent or no tobacco-free policies (OR=0.45, 95% CI: 0.22–0.94). CONCLUSIONS: The large number of tobacco retailers that sell ENDS near colleges suggests a need for better monitoring and regulation of ENDS availability and marketing. The widespread availability of zero-nicotine products suggests a need to examine whether nicotine-free products are as advertised and safe to use. Longitudinal research is needed to understand how retail marketing for ENDS responds to change in tobacco-free policies at nearby campuses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6342456
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher European Publishing on behalf of the International Society for the Prevention of Tobacco Induced Diseases (ISPTID)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63424562019-09-12 ENDS retailers and marketing near university campuses with and without tobacco-free policies Barker, Dianne C. Schleicher, Nina C. Ababseh, Kimberly Johnson, Trent O. Henriksen, Lisa Tob Induc Dis Research Paper INTRODUCTION: This study characterizes the retail environment for Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS) near public universities in California, assesses marketing in the first random sample of ENDS retailers, and compares ENDS retailer density and retail marketing near campuses with and without tobacco-free policies. METHODS: Two data sources were used to construct a sampling frame of possible ENDS retailers, which were mapped within 1–4 miles of 33 campuses of the University of California and the California State University systems. To assess retailer density, a telephone survey of possible ENDS retailers (n=1186) determined who sold e-cigarettes or e-liquids (completion rate=72.9%). To assess retail marketing, trained data collectors completed observations in a random sample (n=438, mean M=13.3 stores per campus, SD=11.2) in the Fall of 2015 RESULTS: In a telephone survey, 59.1% of retailers reported selling e-cigarettes or e-liquids. Half of the campuses had 10 or more ENDS retailers nearby. Most ENDS retailers were convenience stores (42.5%), and more were head shops (8.4%) than smoke shops (6.8%) or vape shops (6.2%). Nearly half (43.6%) of ENDS retailers sold products marketed as zero-nicotine and 13.9% sold NRT. ENDS advertising was visible in 72.4% and on the exterior of 28.1% of retailers. However, the presence of exterior advertising for ENDS was significantly lower near campuses with established tobacco-free policies than near campuses with recent or no tobacco-free policies (OR=0.45, 95% CI: 0.22–0.94). CONCLUSIONS: The large number of tobacco retailers that sell ENDS near colleges suggests a need for better monitoring and regulation of ENDS availability and marketing. The widespread availability of zero-nicotine products suggests a need to examine whether nicotine-free products are as advertised and safe to use. Longitudinal research is needed to understand how retail marketing for ENDS responds to change in tobacco-free policies at nearby campuses. European Publishing on behalf of the International Society for the Prevention of Tobacco Induced Diseases (ISPTID) 2018-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6342456/ /pubmed/30687532 http://dx.doi.org/10.18332/tid/94600 Text en © 2018 Barker D. C https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Barker, Dianne C.
Schleicher, Nina C.
Ababseh, Kimberly
Johnson, Trent O.
Henriksen, Lisa
ENDS retailers and marketing near university campuses with and without tobacco-free policies
title ENDS retailers and marketing near university campuses with and without tobacco-free policies
title_full ENDS retailers and marketing near university campuses with and without tobacco-free policies
title_fullStr ENDS retailers and marketing near university campuses with and without tobacco-free policies
title_full_unstemmed ENDS retailers and marketing near university campuses with and without tobacco-free policies
title_short ENDS retailers and marketing near university campuses with and without tobacco-free policies
title_sort ends retailers and marketing near university campuses with and without tobacco-free policies
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6342456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30687532
http://dx.doi.org/10.18332/tid/94600
work_keys_str_mv AT barkerdiannec endsretailersandmarketingnearuniversitycampuseswithandwithouttobaccofreepolicies
AT schleicherninac endsretailersandmarketingnearuniversitycampuseswithandwithouttobaccofreepolicies
AT ababsehkimberly endsretailersandmarketingnearuniversitycampuseswithandwithouttobaccofreepolicies
AT johnsontrento endsretailersandmarketingnearuniversitycampuseswithandwithouttobaccofreepolicies
AT henriksenlisa endsretailersandmarketingnearuniversitycampuseswithandwithouttobaccofreepolicies