Cargando…

Phylogenetic Flexibility via Hall-Type Inequalities and Submodularity

Given a collection [Formula: see text] of subsets of a finite set X, we say that [Formula: see text] is phylogenetically flexible if, for any collection R of rooted phylogenetic trees whose leaf sets comprise the collection [Formula: see text] , R is compatible (i.e. there is a rooted phylogenetic X...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huber, Katharina T., Moulton, Vincent, Steel, Mike
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6342847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29589255
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11538-018-0419-1
_version_ 1783389163146444800
author Huber, Katharina T.
Moulton, Vincent
Steel, Mike
author_facet Huber, Katharina T.
Moulton, Vincent
Steel, Mike
author_sort Huber, Katharina T.
collection PubMed
description Given a collection [Formula: see text] of subsets of a finite set X, we say that [Formula: see text] is phylogenetically flexible if, for any collection R of rooted phylogenetic trees whose leaf sets comprise the collection [Formula: see text] , R is compatible (i.e. there is a rooted phylogenetic X-tree that displays each tree in R). We show that [Formula: see text] is phylogenetically flexible if and only if it satisfies a Hall-type inequality condition of being ‘slim’. Using submodularity arguments, we show that there is a polynomial-time algorithm for determining whether or not [Formula: see text] is slim. This ‘slim’ condition reduces to a simpler inequality in the case where all of the sets in [Formula: see text] have size 3, a property we call ‘thin’. Thin sets were recently shown to be equivalent to the existence of an (unrooted) tree for which the median function provides an injective mapping to its vertex set; we show here that the unrooted tree in this representation can always be chosen to be a caterpillar tree. We also characterise when a collection [Formula: see text] of subsets of size 2 is thin (in terms of the flexibility of total orders rather than phylogenies) and show that this holds if and only if an associated bipartite graph is a forest. The significance of our results for phylogenetics is in providing precise and efficiently verifiable conditions under which supertree methods that require consistent inputs of trees can be applied to any input trees on given subsets of species.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6342847
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63428472019-02-06 Phylogenetic Flexibility via Hall-Type Inequalities and Submodularity Huber, Katharina T. Moulton, Vincent Steel, Mike Bull Math Biol Special Issue: Algebraic Methods in Phylogenetics Given a collection [Formula: see text] of subsets of a finite set X, we say that [Formula: see text] is phylogenetically flexible if, for any collection R of rooted phylogenetic trees whose leaf sets comprise the collection [Formula: see text] , R is compatible (i.e. there is a rooted phylogenetic X-tree that displays each tree in R). We show that [Formula: see text] is phylogenetically flexible if and only if it satisfies a Hall-type inequality condition of being ‘slim’. Using submodularity arguments, we show that there is a polynomial-time algorithm for determining whether or not [Formula: see text] is slim. This ‘slim’ condition reduces to a simpler inequality in the case where all of the sets in [Formula: see text] have size 3, a property we call ‘thin’. Thin sets were recently shown to be equivalent to the existence of an (unrooted) tree for which the median function provides an injective mapping to its vertex set; we show here that the unrooted tree in this representation can always be chosen to be a caterpillar tree. We also characterise when a collection [Formula: see text] of subsets of size 2 is thin (in terms of the flexibility of total orders rather than phylogenies) and show that this holds if and only if an associated bipartite graph is a forest. The significance of our results for phylogenetics is in providing precise and efficiently verifiable conditions under which supertree methods that require consistent inputs of trees can be applied to any input trees on given subsets of species. Springer US 2018-03-27 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6342847/ /pubmed/29589255 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11538-018-0419-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Special Issue: Algebraic Methods in Phylogenetics
Huber, Katharina T.
Moulton, Vincent
Steel, Mike
Phylogenetic Flexibility via Hall-Type Inequalities and Submodularity
title Phylogenetic Flexibility via Hall-Type Inequalities and Submodularity
title_full Phylogenetic Flexibility via Hall-Type Inequalities and Submodularity
title_fullStr Phylogenetic Flexibility via Hall-Type Inequalities and Submodularity
title_full_unstemmed Phylogenetic Flexibility via Hall-Type Inequalities and Submodularity
title_short Phylogenetic Flexibility via Hall-Type Inequalities and Submodularity
title_sort phylogenetic flexibility via hall-type inequalities and submodularity
topic Special Issue: Algebraic Methods in Phylogenetics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6342847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29589255
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11538-018-0419-1
work_keys_str_mv AT huberkatharinat phylogeneticflexibilityviahalltypeinequalitiesandsubmodularity
AT moultonvincent phylogeneticflexibilityviahalltypeinequalitiesandsubmodularity
AT steelmike phylogeneticflexibilityviahalltypeinequalitiesandsubmodularity