Cargando…
The consistency of neuropathological diagnoses in patients undergoing surgery for suspected recurrence of glioblastoma
PURPOSE: Clinical factors and neuro-imaging in patients with glioblastoma who appear to progress following standard chemoradiation are unable to reliably distinguish tumor progression from pseudo-progression. As a result, surgery is commonly recommended to establish a final diagnosis. However, studi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6342857/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30414096 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11060-018-03037-3 |
_version_ | 1783389165456457728 |
---|---|
author | Holdhoff, Matthias Ye, Xiaobu Piotrowski, Anna F. Strowd, Roy E. Seopaul, Shannon Lu, Yao Barker, Norman J. Sivakumar, Ananyaa Rodriguez, Fausto J. Grossman, Stuart A. Burger, Peter C. |
author_facet | Holdhoff, Matthias Ye, Xiaobu Piotrowski, Anna F. Strowd, Roy E. Seopaul, Shannon Lu, Yao Barker, Norman J. Sivakumar, Ananyaa Rodriguez, Fausto J. Grossman, Stuart A. Burger, Peter C. |
author_sort | Holdhoff, Matthias |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Clinical factors and neuro-imaging in patients with glioblastoma who appear to progress following standard chemoradiation are unable to reliably distinguish tumor progression from pseudo-progression. As a result, surgery is commonly recommended to establish a final diagnosis. However, studies evaluating the pathologists’ agreement on pathologic diagnoses in this setting have not been previously evaluated. METHODS: A hypothetical clinical history coupled with images of histological sections from 13 patients with glioblastoma who underwent diagnostic surgery for suspected early recurrence were sent to 101 pathologists from 50 NCI-designated Cancer Centers. Pathologists were asked to provide a final diagnosis (active tumor, treatment effect, or unable to classify) and to report on percent active tumor, treatment effect, and degree of cellularity and degree of mitotic activity. RESULTS: Forty-eight pathologists (48%) from 30 centers responded. In three cases > 75% of pathologists diagnosed active tumor. In two cases > 75% diagnosed treatment effect. However, in the remaining eight cases the disparity in diagnoses was striking (maximum agreement on final diagnosis ranged from 36 to 68%). Overall, only marginal agreement was observed in the overall assessment of disease status [kappa score 0.228 (95% CI 0.22–0.24)]. CONCLUSIONS: Confidence in any clinical diagnostic assay requires that very similar results are obtained from identical specimens evaluated by sophisticated clinicians and institutions. The findings of this study illustrate that the diagnostic agreement between different cases of repeat resection for suspected recurrent glioblastoma can be variable. This raises concerns as pathological diagnoses are critical in directing standard and experimental care in this setting. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11060-018-03037-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6342857 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63428572019-02-06 The consistency of neuropathological diagnoses in patients undergoing surgery for suspected recurrence of glioblastoma Holdhoff, Matthias Ye, Xiaobu Piotrowski, Anna F. Strowd, Roy E. Seopaul, Shannon Lu, Yao Barker, Norman J. Sivakumar, Ananyaa Rodriguez, Fausto J. Grossman, Stuart A. Burger, Peter C. J Neurooncol Clinical Study PURPOSE: Clinical factors and neuro-imaging in patients with glioblastoma who appear to progress following standard chemoradiation are unable to reliably distinguish tumor progression from pseudo-progression. As a result, surgery is commonly recommended to establish a final diagnosis. However, studies evaluating the pathologists’ agreement on pathologic diagnoses in this setting have not been previously evaluated. METHODS: A hypothetical clinical history coupled with images of histological sections from 13 patients with glioblastoma who underwent diagnostic surgery for suspected early recurrence were sent to 101 pathologists from 50 NCI-designated Cancer Centers. Pathologists were asked to provide a final diagnosis (active tumor, treatment effect, or unable to classify) and to report on percent active tumor, treatment effect, and degree of cellularity and degree of mitotic activity. RESULTS: Forty-eight pathologists (48%) from 30 centers responded. In three cases > 75% of pathologists diagnosed active tumor. In two cases > 75% diagnosed treatment effect. However, in the remaining eight cases the disparity in diagnoses was striking (maximum agreement on final diagnosis ranged from 36 to 68%). Overall, only marginal agreement was observed in the overall assessment of disease status [kappa score 0.228 (95% CI 0.22–0.24)]. CONCLUSIONS: Confidence in any clinical diagnostic assay requires that very similar results are obtained from identical specimens evaluated by sophisticated clinicians and institutions. The findings of this study illustrate that the diagnostic agreement between different cases of repeat resection for suspected recurrent glioblastoma can be variable. This raises concerns as pathological diagnoses are critical in directing standard and experimental care in this setting. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11060-018-03037-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2018-11-09 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6342857/ /pubmed/30414096 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11060-018-03037-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 OpenAccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Holdhoff, Matthias Ye, Xiaobu Piotrowski, Anna F. Strowd, Roy E. Seopaul, Shannon Lu, Yao Barker, Norman J. Sivakumar, Ananyaa Rodriguez, Fausto J. Grossman, Stuart A. Burger, Peter C. The consistency of neuropathological diagnoses in patients undergoing surgery for suspected recurrence of glioblastoma |
title | The consistency of neuropathological diagnoses in patients undergoing surgery for suspected recurrence of glioblastoma |
title_full | The consistency of neuropathological diagnoses in patients undergoing surgery for suspected recurrence of glioblastoma |
title_fullStr | The consistency of neuropathological diagnoses in patients undergoing surgery for suspected recurrence of glioblastoma |
title_full_unstemmed | The consistency of neuropathological diagnoses in patients undergoing surgery for suspected recurrence of glioblastoma |
title_short | The consistency of neuropathological diagnoses in patients undergoing surgery for suspected recurrence of glioblastoma |
title_sort | consistency of neuropathological diagnoses in patients undergoing surgery for suspected recurrence of glioblastoma |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6342857/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30414096 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11060-018-03037-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT holdhoffmatthias theconsistencyofneuropathologicaldiagnosesinpatientsundergoingsurgeryforsuspectedrecurrenceofglioblastoma AT yexiaobu theconsistencyofneuropathologicaldiagnosesinpatientsundergoingsurgeryforsuspectedrecurrenceofglioblastoma AT piotrowskiannaf theconsistencyofneuropathologicaldiagnosesinpatientsundergoingsurgeryforsuspectedrecurrenceofglioblastoma AT strowdroye theconsistencyofneuropathologicaldiagnosesinpatientsundergoingsurgeryforsuspectedrecurrenceofglioblastoma AT seopaulshannon theconsistencyofneuropathologicaldiagnosesinpatientsundergoingsurgeryforsuspectedrecurrenceofglioblastoma AT luyao theconsistencyofneuropathologicaldiagnosesinpatientsundergoingsurgeryforsuspectedrecurrenceofglioblastoma AT barkernormanj theconsistencyofneuropathologicaldiagnosesinpatientsundergoingsurgeryforsuspectedrecurrenceofglioblastoma AT sivakumarananyaa theconsistencyofneuropathologicaldiagnosesinpatientsundergoingsurgeryforsuspectedrecurrenceofglioblastoma AT rodriguezfaustoj theconsistencyofneuropathologicaldiagnosesinpatientsundergoingsurgeryforsuspectedrecurrenceofglioblastoma AT grossmanstuarta theconsistencyofneuropathologicaldiagnosesinpatientsundergoingsurgeryforsuspectedrecurrenceofglioblastoma AT burgerpeterc theconsistencyofneuropathologicaldiagnosesinpatientsundergoingsurgeryforsuspectedrecurrenceofglioblastoma AT holdhoffmatthias consistencyofneuropathologicaldiagnosesinpatientsundergoingsurgeryforsuspectedrecurrenceofglioblastoma AT yexiaobu consistencyofneuropathologicaldiagnosesinpatientsundergoingsurgeryforsuspectedrecurrenceofglioblastoma AT piotrowskiannaf consistencyofneuropathologicaldiagnosesinpatientsundergoingsurgeryforsuspectedrecurrenceofglioblastoma AT strowdroye consistencyofneuropathologicaldiagnosesinpatientsundergoingsurgeryforsuspectedrecurrenceofglioblastoma AT seopaulshannon consistencyofneuropathologicaldiagnosesinpatientsundergoingsurgeryforsuspectedrecurrenceofglioblastoma AT luyao consistencyofneuropathologicaldiagnosesinpatientsundergoingsurgeryforsuspectedrecurrenceofglioblastoma AT barkernormanj consistencyofneuropathologicaldiagnosesinpatientsundergoingsurgeryforsuspectedrecurrenceofglioblastoma AT sivakumarananyaa consistencyofneuropathologicaldiagnosesinpatientsundergoingsurgeryforsuspectedrecurrenceofglioblastoma AT rodriguezfaustoj consistencyofneuropathologicaldiagnosesinpatientsundergoingsurgeryforsuspectedrecurrenceofglioblastoma AT grossmanstuarta consistencyofneuropathologicaldiagnosesinpatientsundergoingsurgeryforsuspectedrecurrenceofglioblastoma AT burgerpeterc consistencyofneuropathologicaldiagnosesinpatientsundergoingsurgeryforsuspectedrecurrenceofglioblastoma |