Cargando…

The consistency of neuropathological diagnoses in patients undergoing surgery for suspected recurrence of glioblastoma

PURPOSE: Clinical factors and neuro-imaging in patients with glioblastoma who appear to progress following standard chemoradiation are unable to reliably distinguish tumor progression from pseudo-progression. As a result, surgery is commonly recommended to establish a final diagnosis. However, studi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Holdhoff, Matthias, Ye, Xiaobu, Piotrowski, Anna F., Strowd, Roy E., Seopaul, Shannon, Lu, Yao, Barker, Norman J., Sivakumar, Ananyaa, Rodriguez, Fausto J., Grossman, Stuart A., Burger, Peter C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6342857/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30414096
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11060-018-03037-3
_version_ 1783389165456457728
author Holdhoff, Matthias
Ye, Xiaobu
Piotrowski, Anna F.
Strowd, Roy E.
Seopaul, Shannon
Lu, Yao
Barker, Norman J.
Sivakumar, Ananyaa
Rodriguez, Fausto J.
Grossman, Stuart A.
Burger, Peter C.
author_facet Holdhoff, Matthias
Ye, Xiaobu
Piotrowski, Anna F.
Strowd, Roy E.
Seopaul, Shannon
Lu, Yao
Barker, Norman J.
Sivakumar, Ananyaa
Rodriguez, Fausto J.
Grossman, Stuart A.
Burger, Peter C.
author_sort Holdhoff, Matthias
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Clinical factors and neuro-imaging in patients with glioblastoma who appear to progress following standard chemoradiation are unable to reliably distinguish tumor progression from pseudo-progression. As a result, surgery is commonly recommended to establish a final diagnosis. However, studies evaluating the pathologists’ agreement on pathologic diagnoses in this setting have not been previously evaluated. METHODS: A hypothetical clinical history coupled with images of histological sections from 13 patients with glioblastoma who underwent diagnostic surgery for suspected early recurrence were sent to 101 pathologists from 50 NCI-designated Cancer Centers. Pathologists were asked to provide a final diagnosis (active tumor, treatment effect, or unable to classify) and to report on percent active tumor, treatment effect, and degree of cellularity and degree of mitotic activity. RESULTS: Forty-eight pathologists (48%) from 30 centers responded. In three cases > 75% of pathologists diagnosed active tumor. In two cases > 75% diagnosed treatment effect. However, in the remaining eight cases the disparity in diagnoses was striking (maximum agreement on final diagnosis ranged from 36 to 68%). Overall, only marginal agreement was observed in the overall assessment of disease status [kappa score 0.228 (95% CI 0.22–0.24)]. CONCLUSIONS: Confidence in any clinical diagnostic assay requires that very similar results are obtained from identical specimens evaluated by sophisticated clinicians and institutions. The findings of this study illustrate that the diagnostic agreement between different cases of repeat resection for suspected recurrent glioblastoma can be variable. This raises concerns as pathological diagnoses are critical in directing standard and experimental care in this setting. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11060-018-03037-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6342857
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63428572019-02-06 The consistency of neuropathological diagnoses in patients undergoing surgery for suspected recurrence of glioblastoma Holdhoff, Matthias Ye, Xiaobu Piotrowski, Anna F. Strowd, Roy E. Seopaul, Shannon Lu, Yao Barker, Norman J. Sivakumar, Ananyaa Rodriguez, Fausto J. Grossman, Stuart A. Burger, Peter C. J Neurooncol Clinical Study PURPOSE: Clinical factors and neuro-imaging in patients with glioblastoma who appear to progress following standard chemoradiation are unable to reliably distinguish tumor progression from pseudo-progression. As a result, surgery is commonly recommended to establish a final diagnosis. However, studies evaluating the pathologists’ agreement on pathologic diagnoses in this setting have not been previously evaluated. METHODS: A hypothetical clinical history coupled with images of histological sections from 13 patients with glioblastoma who underwent diagnostic surgery for suspected early recurrence were sent to 101 pathologists from 50 NCI-designated Cancer Centers. Pathologists were asked to provide a final diagnosis (active tumor, treatment effect, or unable to classify) and to report on percent active tumor, treatment effect, and degree of cellularity and degree of mitotic activity. RESULTS: Forty-eight pathologists (48%) from 30 centers responded. In three cases > 75% of pathologists diagnosed active tumor. In two cases > 75% diagnosed treatment effect. However, in the remaining eight cases the disparity in diagnoses was striking (maximum agreement on final diagnosis ranged from 36 to 68%). Overall, only marginal agreement was observed in the overall assessment of disease status [kappa score 0.228 (95% CI 0.22–0.24)]. CONCLUSIONS: Confidence in any clinical diagnostic assay requires that very similar results are obtained from identical specimens evaluated by sophisticated clinicians and institutions. The findings of this study illustrate that the diagnostic agreement between different cases of repeat resection for suspected recurrent glioblastoma can be variable. This raises concerns as pathological diagnoses are critical in directing standard and experimental care in this setting. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11060-018-03037-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2018-11-09 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6342857/ /pubmed/30414096 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11060-018-03037-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 OpenAccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Holdhoff, Matthias
Ye, Xiaobu
Piotrowski, Anna F.
Strowd, Roy E.
Seopaul, Shannon
Lu, Yao
Barker, Norman J.
Sivakumar, Ananyaa
Rodriguez, Fausto J.
Grossman, Stuart A.
Burger, Peter C.
The consistency of neuropathological diagnoses in patients undergoing surgery for suspected recurrence of glioblastoma
title The consistency of neuropathological diagnoses in patients undergoing surgery for suspected recurrence of glioblastoma
title_full The consistency of neuropathological diagnoses in patients undergoing surgery for suspected recurrence of glioblastoma
title_fullStr The consistency of neuropathological diagnoses in patients undergoing surgery for suspected recurrence of glioblastoma
title_full_unstemmed The consistency of neuropathological diagnoses in patients undergoing surgery for suspected recurrence of glioblastoma
title_short The consistency of neuropathological diagnoses in patients undergoing surgery for suspected recurrence of glioblastoma
title_sort consistency of neuropathological diagnoses in patients undergoing surgery for suspected recurrence of glioblastoma
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6342857/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30414096
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11060-018-03037-3
work_keys_str_mv AT holdhoffmatthias theconsistencyofneuropathologicaldiagnosesinpatientsundergoingsurgeryforsuspectedrecurrenceofglioblastoma
AT yexiaobu theconsistencyofneuropathologicaldiagnosesinpatientsundergoingsurgeryforsuspectedrecurrenceofglioblastoma
AT piotrowskiannaf theconsistencyofneuropathologicaldiagnosesinpatientsundergoingsurgeryforsuspectedrecurrenceofglioblastoma
AT strowdroye theconsistencyofneuropathologicaldiagnosesinpatientsundergoingsurgeryforsuspectedrecurrenceofglioblastoma
AT seopaulshannon theconsistencyofneuropathologicaldiagnosesinpatientsundergoingsurgeryforsuspectedrecurrenceofglioblastoma
AT luyao theconsistencyofneuropathologicaldiagnosesinpatientsundergoingsurgeryforsuspectedrecurrenceofglioblastoma
AT barkernormanj theconsistencyofneuropathologicaldiagnosesinpatientsundergoingsurgeryforsuspectedrecurrenceofglioblastoma
AT sivakumarananyaa theconsistencyofneuropathologicaldiagnosesinpatientsundergoingsurgeryforsuspectedrecurrenceofglioblastoma
AT rodriguezfaustoj theconsistencyofneuropathologicaldiagnosesinpatientsundergoingsurgeryforsuspectedrecurrenceofglioblastoma
AT grossmanstuarta theconsistencyofneuropathologicaldiagnosesinpatientsundergoingsurgeryforsuspectedrecurrenceofglioblastoma
AT burgerpeterc theconsistencyofneuropathologicaldiagnosesinpatientsundergoingsurgeryforsuspectedrecurrenceofglioblastoma
AT holdhoffmatthias consistencyofneuropathologicaldiagnosesinpatientsundergoingsurgeryforsuspectedrecurrenceofglioblastoma
AT yexiaobu consistencyofneuropathologicaldiagnosesinpatientsundergoingsurgeryforsuspectedrecurrenceofglioblastoma
AT piotrowskiannaf consistencyofneuropathologicaldiagnosesinpatientsundergoingsurgeryforsuspectedrecurrenceofglioblastoma
AT strowdroye consistencyofneuropathologicaldiagnosesinpatientsundergoingsurgeryforsuspectedrecurrenceofglioblastoma
AT seopaulshannon consistencyofneuropathologicaldiagnosesinpatientsundergoingsurgeryforsuspectedrecurrenceofglioblastoma
AT luyao consistencyofneuropathologicaldiagnosesinpatientsundergoingsurgeryforsuspectedrecurrenceofglioblastoma
AT barkernormanj consistencyofneuropathologicaldiagnosesinpatientsundergoingsurgeryforsuspectedrecurrenceofglioblastoma
AT sivakumarananyaa consistencyofneuropathologicaldiagnosesinpatientsundergoingsurgeryforsuspectedrecurrenceofglioblastoma
AT rodriguezfaustoj consistencyofneuropathologicaldiagnosesinpatientsundergoingsurgeryforsuspectedrecurrenceofglioblastoma
AT grossmanstuarta consistencyofneuropathologicaldiagnosesinpatientsundergoingsurgeryforsuspectedrecurrenceofglioblastoma
AT burgerpeterc consistencyofneuropathologicaldiagnosesinpatientsundergoingsurgeryforsuspectedrecurrenceofglioblastoma