Cargando…

Forensic reconstruction of two military combat related shooting incidents using an anatomically correct synthetic skull with a surrogate skin/soft tissue layer

Six synthetic head models wearing ballistic protective helmets were used to recreate two military combat-related shooting incidents (three per incident, designated ‘Incident 1’ and ‘Incident 2’). Data on the events including engagement distances, weapon and ammunition types was collated by the Defen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mahoney, Peter, Carr, Debra, Harrison, Karl, McGuire, Ruth, Hepper, Alan, Flynn, Daniel, Delaney, Russ J., Gibb, Iain
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6342880/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29516250
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00414-018-1802-z
_version_ 1783389170765398016
author Mahoney, Peter
Carr, Debra
Harrison, Karl
McGuire, Ruth
Hepper, Alan
Flynn, Daniel
Delaney, Russ J.
Gibb, Iain
author_facet Mahoney, Peter
Carr, Debra
Harrison, Karl
McGuire, Ruth
Hepper, Alan
Flynn, Daniel
Delaney, Russ J.
Gibb, Iain
author_sort Mahoney, Peter
collection PubMed
description Six synthetic head models wearing ballistic protective helmets were used to recreate two military combat-related shooting incidents (three per incident, designated ‘Incident 1’ and ‘Incident 2’). Data on the events including engagement distances, weapon and ammunition types was collated by the Defence Science and Technology Laboratory. The models were shot with 7.62 × 39 mm ammunition downloaded to mean impact velocities of 581 m/s (SD 3.5 m/s) and 418 m/s (SD 8 m/s), respectively, to simulate the engagement distances. The damage to the models was assessed using CT imaging and dissection by a forensic pathologist experienced in reviewing military gunshot wounds. The helmets were examined by an MoD engineer experienced in ballistic incident analysis. Damage to the helmets was consistent with that seen in real incidents. Fracture patterns and CT imaging on two of the models for Incident 1 (a frontal impact) were congruent with the actual incident being modelled. The results for Incident 2 (a temporoparietal impact) produced realistic simulations of tangential gunshot injury but were less representative of the scenario being modelled. Other aspects of the wounds produced also exhibited differences. Further work is ongoing to develop the models for greater ballistic injury fidelity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6342880
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63428802019-02-15 Forensic reconstruction of two military combat related shooting incidents using an anatomically correct synthetic skull with a surrogate skin/soft tissue layer Mahoney, Peter Carr, Debra Harrison, Karl McGuire, Ruth Hepper, Alan Flynn, Daniel Delaney, Russ J. Gibb, Iain Int J Legal Med Original Article Six synthetic head models wearing ballistic protective helmets were used to recreate two military combat-related shooting incidents (three per incident, designated ‘Incident 1’ and ‘Incident 2’). Data on the events including engagement distances, weapon and ammunition types was collated by the Defence Science and Technology Laboratory. The models were shot with 7.62 × 39 mm ammunition downloaded to mean impact velocities of 581 m/s (SD 3.5 m/s) and 418 m/s (SD 8 m/s), respectively, to simulate the engagement distances. The damage to the models was assessed using CT imaging and dissection by a forensic pathologist experienced in reviewing military gunshot wounds. The helmets were examined by an MoD engineer experienced in ballistic incident analysis. Damage to the helmets was consistent with that seen in real incidents. Fracture patterns and CT imaging on two of the models for Incident 1 (a frontal impact) were congruent with the actual incident being modelled. The results for Incident 2 (a temporoparietal impact) produced realistic simulations of tangential gunshot injury but were less representative of the scenario being modelled. Other aspects of the wounds produced also exhibited differences. Further work is ongoing to develop the models for greater ballistic injury fidelity. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-03-07 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6342880/ /pubmed/29516250 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00414-018-1802-z Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mahoney, Peter
Carr, Debra
Harrison, Karl
McGuire, Ruth
Hepper, Alan
Flynn, Daniel
Delaney, Russ J.
Gibb, Iain
Forensic reconstruction of two military combat related shooting incidents using an anatomically correct synthetic skull with a surrogate skin/soft tissue layer
title Forensic reconstruction of two military combat related shooting incidents using an anatomically correct synthetic skull with a surrogate skin/soft tissue layer
title_full Forensic reconstruction of two military combat related shooting incidents using an anatomically correct synthetic skull with a surrogate skin/soft tissue layer
title_fullStr Forensic reconstruction of two military combat related shooting incidents using an anatomically correct synthetic skull with a surrogate skin/soft tissue layer
title_full_unstemmed Forensic reconstruction of two military combat related shooting incidents using an anatomically correct synthetic skull with a surrogate skin/soft tissue layer
title_short Forensic reconstruction of two military combat related shooting incidents using an anatomically correct synthetic skull with a surrogate skin/soft tissue layer
title_sort forensic reconstruction of two military combat related shooting incidents using an anatomically correct synthetic skull with a surrogate skin/soft tissue layer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6342880/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29516250
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00414-018-1802-z
work_keys_str_mv AT mahoneypeter forensicreconstructionoftwomilitarycombatrelatedshootingincidentsusingananatomicallycorrectsyntheticskullwithasurrogateskinsofttissuelayer
AT carrdebra forensicreconstructionoftwomilitarycombatrelatedshootingincidentsusingananatomicallycorrectsyntheticskullwithasurrogateskinsofttissuelayer
AT harrisonkarl forensicreconstructionoftwomilitarycombatrelatedshootingincidentsusingananatomicallycorrectsyntheticskullwithasurrogateskinsofttissuelayer
AT mcguireruth forensicreconstructionoftwomilitarycombatrelatedshootingincidentsusingananatomicallycorrectsyntheticskullwithasurrogateskinsofttissuelayer
AT hepperalan forensicreconstructionoftwomilitarycombatrelatedshootingincidentsusingananatomicallycorrectsyntheticskullwithasurrogateskinsofttissuelayer
AT flynndaniel forensicreconstructionoftwomilitarycombatrelatedshootingincidentsusingananatomicallycorrectsyntheticskullwithasurrogateskinsofttissuelayer
AT delaneyrussj forensicreconstructionoftwomilitarycombatrelatedshootingincidentsusingananatomicallycorrectsyntheticskullwithasurrogateskinsofttissuelayer
AT gibbiain forensicreconstructionoftwomilitarycombatrelatedshootingincidentsusingananatomicallycorrectsyntheticskullwithasurrogateskinsofttissuelayer