Cargando…

Long-term risk of screen-detected and interval breast cancer after false-positive results at mammography screening: joint analysis of three national cohorts

BACKGROUND: We assessed the long-term risk of screen-detected and interval breast cancer in women with a first or second false-positive screening result. METHODS: Joint analysis had been performed using individual-level data from three population-based screening programs in Europe (Copenhagen in Den...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Román, Marta, Hofvind, Solveig, von Euler-Chelpin, My, Castells, Xavier
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6342908/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30563993
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-018-0358-5
_version_ 1783389177277054976
author Román, Marta
Hofvind, Solveig
von Euler-Chelpin, My
Castells, Xavier
author_facet Román, Marta
Hofvind, Solveig
von Euler-Chelpin, My
Castells, Xavier
author_sort Román, Marta
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We assessed the long-term risk of screen-detected and interval breast cancer in women with a first or second false-positive screening result. METHODS: Joint analysis had been performed using individual-level data from three population-based screening programs in Europe (Copenhagen in Denmark, Norway, and Spain). Overall, 75,513 screened women aged 50–69 years from Denmark (1991–2010), 556,640 from Norway (1996–2008), and 517,314 from Spain (1994–2010) were included. We used partly conditional Cox hazards models to assess the association between false-positive results and the risk of subsequent screen-detected and interval cancer. RESULTS: During follow-up, 1,149,467 women underwent 3,510,450 screening exams, and 10,623 screen-detected and 5700 interval cancers were diagnosed. Compared to women with negative tests, those with false-positive results had a two-fold risk of screen-detected (HR = 2.04, 95% CI: 1.93–2.16) and interval cancer (HR = 2.18, 95% CI: 2.02–2.34). Women with a second false-positive result had over a four-fold risk of screen-detected and interval cancer (HR = 4.71, 95% CI: 3.81–5.83 and HR = 4.22, 95% CI: 3.27–5.46, respectively). Women remained at an elevated risk for 12 years after the false-positive result. CONCLUSIONS: Women with prior false-positive results had an increased risk of screen-detected and interval cancer for over a decade. This information should be considered to design personalised screening strategies based on individual risk.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6342908
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63429082019-12-19 Long-term risk of screen-detected and interval breast cancer after false-positive results at mammography screening: joint analysis of three national cohorts Román, Marta Hofvind, Solveig von Euler-Chelpin, My Castells, Xavier Br J Cancer Article BACKGROUND: We assessed the long-term risk of screen-detected and interval breast cancer in women with a first or second false-positive screening result. METHODS: Joint analysis had been performed using individual-level data from three population-based screening programs in Europe (Copenhagen in Denmark, Norway, and Spain). Overall, 75,513 screened women aged 50–69 years from Denmark (1991–2010), 556,640 from Norway (1996–2008), and 517,314 from Spain (1994–2010) were included. We used partly conditional Cox hazards models to assess the association between false-positive results and the risk of subsequent screen-detected and interval cancer. RESULTS: During follow-up, 1,149,467 women underwent 3,510,450 screening exams, and 10,623 screen-detected and 5700 interval cancers were diagnosed. Compared to women with negative tests, those with false-positive results had a two-fold risk of screen-detected (HR = 2.04, 95% CI: 1.93–2.16) and interval cancer (HR = 2.18, 95% CI: 2.02–2.34). Women with a second false-positive result had over a four-fold risk of screen-detected and interval cancer (HR = 4.71, 95% CI: 3.81–5.83 and HR = 4.22, 95% CI: 3.27–5.46, respectively). Women remained at an elevated risk for 12 years after the false-positive result. CONCLUSIONS: Women with prior false-positive results had an increased risk of screen-detected and interval cancer for over a decade. This information should be considered to design personalised screening strategies based on individual risk. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-12-19 2019-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6342908/ /pubmed/30563993 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-018-0358-5 Text en © Cancer Research UK 2018 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is published under the standard license to publish agreement. After 12 months the work will become freely available and the license terms will switch to a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
spellingShingle Article
Román, Marta
Hofvind, Solveig
von Euler-Chelpin, My
Castells, Xavier
Long-term risk of screen-detected and interval breast cancer after false-positive results at mammography screening: joint analysis of three national cohorts
title Long-term risk of screen-detected and interval breast cancer after false-positive results at mammography screening: joint analysis of three national cohorts
title_full Long-term risk of screen-detected and interval breast cancer after false-positive results at mammography screening: joint analysis of three national cohorts
title_fullStr Long-term risk of screen-detected and interval breast cancer after false-positive results at mammography screening: joint analysis of three national cohorts
title_full_unstemmed Long-term risk of screen-detected and interval breast cancer after false-positive results at mammography screening: joint analysis of three national cohorts
title_short Long-term risk of screen-detected and interval breast cancer after false-positive results at mammography screening: joint analysis of three national cohorts
title_sort long-term risk of screen-detected and interval breast cancer after false-positive results at mammography screening: joint analysis of three national cohorts
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6342908/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30563993
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-018-0358-5
work_keys_str_mv AT romanmarta longtermriskofscreendetectedandintervalbreastcancerafterfalsepositiveresultsatmammographyscreeningjointanalysisofthreenationalcohorts
AT hofvindsolveig longtermriskofscreendetectedandintervalbreastcancerafterfalsepositiveresultsatmammographyscreeningjointanalysisofthreenationalcohorts
AT voneulerchelpinmy longtermriskofscreendetectedandintervalbreastcancerafterfalsepositiveresultsatmammographyscreeningjointanalysisofthreenationalcohorts
AT castellsxavier longtermriskofscreendetectedandintervalbreastcancerafterfalsepositiveresultsatmammographyscreeningjointanalysisofthreenationalcohorts