Cargando…

Global regulation of methane emission from natural lakes

Methane (CH(4)) emissions from lakes are the largest of the emissions from freshwater ecosystems. We compile open water CH(4) emission estimates from individual lakes from all over the world and consider the three main emission pathways: diffusive; ebullitive; and storage. The relationships between...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sanches, Lúcia Fernandes, Guenet, Bertrand, Marinho, Claudio Cardoso, Barros, Nathan, de Assis Esteves, Francisco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6343025/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30670764
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-36519-5
Descripción
Sumario:Methane (CH(4)) emissions from lakes are the largest of the emissions from freshwater ecosystems. We compile open water CH(4) emission estimates from individual lakes from all over the world and consider the three main emission pathways: diffusive; ebullitive; and storage. The relationships between emissions, environmental variables, lake characteristics and methodological approaches are investigated for the measurements from 297 lakes. We show that environmental factors, such as temperature and precipitation, act as important driving factors for CH(4) emissions, with higher emissions occurring where air temperature and precipitation are high. The diffusive flux of CH(4) was found to be positively related to dissolved organic carbon concentration. Diffusive flux is the most frequently estimated component of the total flux, while the other emission pathways are often neglected. Based on the cases where all three components of the total flux were measured (30 lakes), we estimate that measuring the diffusive emission only, and then assuming that the value obtained is a good surrogate for the total emission, would have led to a 277% underestimation of the real total flux. In addition we show that the estimation of fluxes is method-dependent with substantial differences revealed between the flux estimates obtained from different measurement techniques. Some of this uncertainty is due to technical constraints which should not be neglected, and lake CH(4) flux measurement techniques require thorough re-evaluation.