Cargando…

Endoscopic resection techniques for colorectal neoplasia: Current developments

Endoscopic polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) are the established treatment standards for colorectal polyps. Current research aims at the reduction of both complication and recurrence rates as well as on shortening procedure times. Cold snare resection is the emerging standard for th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dumoulin, Franz Ludwig, Hildenbrand, Ralf
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6343101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30686899
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i3.300
_version_ 1783389221315149824
author Dumoulin, Franz Ludwig
Hildenbrand, Ralf
author_facet Dumoulin, Franz Ludwig
Hildenbrand, Ralf
author_sort Dumoulin, Franz Ludwig
collection PubMed
description Endoscopic polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) are the established treatment standards for colorectal polyps. Current research aims at the reduction of both complication and recurrence rates as well as on shortening procedure times. Cold snare resection is the emerging standard for the treatment of smaller (< 5mm) polyps and is possibly also suitable for the removal of non-cancerous polyps up to 9 mm. The method avoids thermal damage, has reduced procedure times and probably also a lower risk for delayed bleeding. On the other end of the treatment spectrum, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) offers en bloc resection of larger flat or sessile lesions. The technique has obvious advantages in the treatment of high-grade dysplasia and early cancer. Due to its minimal recurrence rate, it may also be an alternative to fractionated EMR of larger flat or sessile lesions. However, ESD is technically demanding and burdened by longer procedure times and higher costs. It should therefore be restricted to lesions suspicious for high-grade dysplasia or early invasive cancer. The latest addition to endoscopic resection techniques is endoscopic full-thickness resection with specifically developed devices for flexible endoscopy. This method is very useful for the treatment of smaller difficult-to-resect lesions, e.g., recurrence with scar formation after previous endoscopic resections.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6343101
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63431012019-01-26 Endoscopic resection techniques for colorectal neoplasia: Current developments Dumoulin, Franz Ludwig Hildenbrand, Ralf World J Gastroenterol Minireviews Endoscopic polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) are the established treatment standards for colorectal polyps. Current research aims at the reduction of both complication and recurrence rates as well as on shortening procedure times. Cold snare resection is the emerging standard for the treatment of smaller (< 5mm) polyps and is possibly also suitable for the removal of non-cancerous polyps up to 9 mm. The method avoids thermal damage, has reduced procedure times and probably also a lower risk for delayed bleeding. On the other end of the treatment spectrum, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) offers en bloc resection of larger flat or sessile lesions. The technique has obvious advantages in the treatment of high-grade dysplasia and early cancer. Due to its minimal recurrence rate, it may also be an alternative to fractionated EMR of larger flat or sessile lesions. However, ESD is technically demanding and burdened by longer procedure times and higher costs. It should therefore be restricted to lesions suspicious for high-grade dysplasia or early invasive cancer. The latest addition to endoscopic resection techniques is endoscopic full-thickness resection with specifically developed devices for flexible endoscopy. This method is very useful for the treatment of smaller difficult-to-resect lesions, e.g., recurrence with scar formation after previous endoscopic resections. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2019-01-21 2019-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6343101/ /pubmed/30686899 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i3.300 Text en ©The Author(s) 2019. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.
spellingShingle Minireviews
Dumoulin, Franz Ludwig
Hildenbrand, Ralf
Endoscopic resection techniques for colorectal neoplasia: Current developments
title Endoscopic resection techniques for colorectal neoplasia: Current developments
title_full Endoscopic resection techniques for colorectal neoplasia: Current developments
title_fullStr Endoscopic resection techniques for colorectal neoplasia: Current developments
title_full_unstemmed Endoscopic resection techniques for colorectal neoplasia: Current developments
title_short Endoscopic resection techniques for colorectal neoplasia: Current developments
title_sort endoscopic resection techniques for colorectal neoplasia: current developments
topic Minireviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6343101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30686899
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i3.300
work_keys_str_mv AT dumoulinfranzludwig endoscopicresectiontechniquesforcolorectalneoplasiacurrentdevelopments
AT hildenbrandralf endoscopicresectiontechniquesforcolorectalneoplasiacurrentdevelopments