Cargando…
Endoscopic resection techniques for colorectal neoplasia: Current developments
Endoscopic polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) are the established treatment standards for colorectal polyps. Current research aims at the reduction of both complication and recurrence rates as well as on shortening procedure times. Cold snare resection is the emerging standard for th...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6343101/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30686899 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i3.300 |
_version_ | 1783389221315149824 |
---|---|
author | Dumoulin, Franz Ludwig Hildenbrand, Ralf |
author_facet | Dumoulin, Franz Ludwig Hildenbrand, Ralf |
author_sort | Dumoulin, Franz Ludwig |
collection | PubMed |
description | Endoscopic polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) are the established treatment standards for colorectal polyps. Current research aims at the reduction of both complication and recurrence rates as well as on shortening procedure times. Cold snare resection is the emerging standard for the treatment of smaller (< 5mm) polyps and is possibly also suitable for the removal of non-cancerous polyps up to 9 mm. The method avoids thermal damage, has reduced procedure times and probably also a lower risk for delayed bleeding. On the other end of the treatment spectrum, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) offers en bloc resection of larger flat or sessile lesions. The technique has obvious advantages in the treatment of high-grade dysplasia and early cancer. Due to its minimal recurrence rate, it may also be an alternative to fractionated EMR of larger flat or sessile lesions. However, ESD is technically demanding and burdened by longer procedure times and higher costs. It should therefore be restricted to lesions suspicious for high-grade dysplasia or early invasive cancer. The latest addition to endoscopic resection techniques is endoscopic full-thickness resection with specifically developed devices for flexible endoscopy. This method is very useful for the treatment of smaller difficult-to-resect lesions, e.g., recurrence with scar formation after previous endoscopic resections. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6343101 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63431012019-01-26 Endoscopic resection techniques for colorectal neoplasia: Current developments Dumoulin, Franz Ludwig Hildenbrand, Ralf World J Gastroenterol Minireviews Endoscopic polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) are the established treatment standards for colorectal polyps. Current research aims at the reduction of both complication and recurrence rates as well as on shortening procedure times. Cold snare resection is the emerging standard for the treatment of smaller (< 5mm) polyps and is possibly also suitable for the removal of non-cancerous polyps up to 9 mm. The method avoids thermal damage, has reduced procedure times and probably also a lower risk for delayed bleeding. On the other end of the treatment spectrum, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) offers en bloc resection of larger flat or sessile lesions. The technique has obvious advantages in the treatment of high-grade dysplasia and early cancer. Due to its minimal recurrence rate, it may also be an alternative to fractionated EMR of larger flat or sessile lesions. However, ESD is technically demanding and burdened by longer procedure times and higher costs. It should therefore be restricted to lesions suspicious for high-grade dysplasia or early invasive cancer. The latest addition to endoscopic resection techniques is endoscopic full-thickness resection with specifically developed devices for flexible endoscopy. This method is very useful for the treatment of smaller difficult-to-resect lesions, e.g., recurrence with scar formation after previous endoscopic resections. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2019-01-21 2019-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6343101/ /pubmed/30686899 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i3.300 Text en ©The Author(s) 2019. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. |
spellingShingle | Minireviews Dumoulin, Franz Ludwig Hildenbrand, Ralf Endoscopic resection techniques for colorectal neoplasia: Current developments |
title | Endoscopic resection techniques for colorectal neoplasia: Current developments |
title_full | Endoscopic resection techniques for colorectal neoplasia: Current developments |
title_fullStr | Endoscopic resection techniques for colorectal neoplasia: Current developments |
title_full_unstemmed | Endoscopic resection techniques for colorectal neoplasia: Current developments |
title_short | Endoscopic resection techniques for colorectal neoplasia: Current developments |
title_sort | endoscopic resection techniques for colorectal neoplasia: current developments |
topic | Minireviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6343101/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30686899 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i3.300 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dumoulinfranzludwig endoscopicresectiontechniquesforcolorectalneoplasiacurrentdevelopments AT hildenbrandralf endoscopicresectiontechniquesforcolorectalneoplasiacurrentdevelopments |