Cargando…
Clinical results and complications following surgical management of symptomatic os acromiale: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: This review compares the outcomes and complication rates of three surgical strategies used for the management of symptomatic os acromiale. The purpose of this study was to help guide best practice recommendations. METHODS: A systematic review of nine prospective studies, seven retrospect...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6343250/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30674325 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-1041-5 |
_version_ | 1783389246386601984 |
---|---|
author | Purnell, Jennifer A. Bourget-Murray, Jonathan Kwapisz, Adam Bois, Aaron J. LeBlanc, Justin |
author_facet | Purnell, Jennifer A. Bourget-Murray, Jonathan Kwapisz, Adam Bois, Aaron J. LeBlanc, Justin |
author_sort | Purnell, Jennifer A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This review compares the outcomes and complication rates of three surgical strategies used for the management of symptomatic os acromiale. The purpose of this study was to help guide best practice recommendations. METHODS: A systematic review of nine prospective studies, seven retrospective studies, and three case studies published across ten countries between 1993 and 2018 was performed. Adult patients (i.e., ≥ 18 years of age) with a symptomatic os acromiale that failed nonoperative management were included in this review. Surgical techniques utilized within the included studies include excision, acromioplasty, and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). The primary outcomes of interest included patient satisfaction. Range of motion and several standardized outcome measurement tools were also included in the final analysis. RESULTS: Patient satisfaction was highest in the excision and ORIF groups, with 92% and 82% of patients reporting good to excellent postoperative results, respectively, compared to 63% in the acromioplasty group. All three patient groups experienced improvements in postoperative outcomes (i.e., active range of motion and patient-reported outcome scores). The excision group experienced a complication rate of 1%, while the acromioplasty group experienced a complication rate of 11% and the ORIF group a rate of 67%. CONCLUSION: This study reports on the largest sample of patients who underwent surgical treatment for a symptomatic os acromiale. We have demonstrated that excision of the os with meticulous repair of the deltoid resulted in the best clinical outcomes with the least complications. In healthy adult patients with a large os fragment and a normal rotator cuff, surgical fixation may provide increased preservation of deltoid function while offering good to excellent patient satisfaction. However, patients must be informed that a second procedure may be required to remove symptomatic hardware. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6343250 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63432502019-01-24 Clinical results and complications following surgical management of symptomatic os acromiale: a systematic review Purnell, Jennifer A. Bourget-Murray, Jonathan Kwapisz, Adam Bois, Aaron J. LeBlanc, Justin J Orthop Surg Res Systematic Review BACKGROUND: This review compares the outcomes and complication rates of three surgical strategies used for the management of symptomatic os acromiale. The purpose of this study was to help guide best practice recommendations. METHODS: A systematic review of nine prospective studies, seven retrospective studies, and three case studies published across ten countries between 1993 and 2018 was performed. Adult patients (i.e., ≥ 18 years of age) with a symptomatic os acromiale that failed nonoperative management were included in this review. Surgical techniques utilized within the included studies include excision, acromioplasty, and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). The primary outcomes of interest included patient satisfaction. Range of motion and several standardized outcome measurement tools were also included in the final analysis. RESULTS: Patient satisfaction was highest in the excision and ORIF groups, with 92% and 82% of patients reporting good to excellent postoperative results, respectively, compared to 63% in the acromioplasty group. All three patient groups experienced improvements in postoperative outcomes (i.e., active range of motion and patient-reported outcome scores). The excision group experienced a complication rate of 1%, while the acromioplasty group experienced a complication rate of 11% and the ORIF group a rate of 67%. CONCLUSION: This study reports on the largest sample of patients who underwent surgical treatment for a symptomatic os acromiale. We have demonstrated that excision of the os with meticulous repair of the deltoid resulted in the best clinical outcomes with the least complications. In healthy adult patients with a large os fragment and a normal rotator cuff, surgical fixation may provide increased preservation of deltoid function while offering good to excellent patient satisfaction. However, patients must be informed that a second procedure may be required to remove symptomatic hardware. BioMed Central 2019-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6343250/ /pubmed/30674325 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-1041-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Purnell, Jennifer A. Bourget-Murray, Jonathan Kwapisz, Adam Bois, Aaron J. LeBlanc, Justin Clinical results and complications following surgical management of symptomatic os acromiale: a systematic review |
title | Clinical results and complications following surgical management of symptomatic os acromiale: a systematic review |
title_full | Clinical results and complications following surgical management of symptomatic os acromiale: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Clinical results and complications following surgical management of symptomatic os acromiale: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical results and complications following surgical management of symptomatic os acromiale: a systematic review |
title_short | Clinical results and complications following surgical management of symptomatic os acromiale: a systematic review |
title_sort | clinical results and complications following surgical management of symptomatic os acromiale: a systematic review |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6343250/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30674325 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-1041-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT purnelljennifera clinicalresultsandcomplicationsfollowingsurgicalmanagementofsymptomaticosacromialeasystematicreview AT bourgetmurrayjonathan clinicalresultsandcomplicationsfollowingsurgicalmanagementofsymptomaticosacromialeasystematicreview AT kwapiszadam clinicalresultsandcomplicationsfollowingsurgicalmanagementofsymptomaticosacromialeasystematicreview AT boisaaronj clinicalresultsandcomplicationsfollowingsurgicalmanagementofsymptomaticosacromialeasystematicreview AT leblancjustin clinicalresultsandcomplicationsfollowingsurgicalmanagementofsymptomaticosacromialeasystematicreview |