Cargando…

Re-negotiating agency – patients using comics to reflect upon acting in situations of abuse in health care

BACKGROUND: There is a growing body of international research that displays the prevalence and character of abuse in health care. Even though most of these studies are conducted from a patient perspective little is known about how patients conceptualize their agency in relation to such situations. T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brüggemann, A. Jelmer, Forsberg, Camilla, Thornberg, Robert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6343282/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30674310
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-3902-y
_version_ 1783389253867143168
author Brüggemann, A. Jelmer
Forsberg, Camilla
Thornberg, Robert
author_facet Brüggemann, A. Jelmer
Forsberg, Camilla
Thornberg, Robert
author_sort Brüggemann, A. Jelmer
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is a growing body of international research that displays the prevalence and character of abuse in health care. Even though most of these studies are conducted from a patient perspective little is known about how patients conceptualize their agency in relation to such situations. This study aimed to explore how patients reason about their potential to act in abusive situations. METHODS: Qualitative interviews were conducted with thirteen patients in Sweden. Central in the interviews were three comics, inspired by Boal’s Forum Theatre and part of an earlier online intervention study in which the informants had participated. Each comic showed a situation in which a patient feels abused, and on the opposite side were suggestions for how the patient could act in response. Informants were asked to reflect about situations of abuse and in specific upon the comics. We used the methodology of constructivist grounded theory throughout the study, including the analysis. RESULTS: It appeared that the informants constantly re-negotiated their and other patients’ agency in relation to the specifics of the event, patients’ and staff’s responsibilities, and the patients’ needs and values. This process questions views of agency as fixed and self-evident, and can be understood as part of changing discourses about patients’ social role and possibilities to organize their care. Using a feminist theory of power we expected the informants to elicit instances of resistance to domination, which is central to the comics. While doing that, the informants also hinted at parallel stories of empowerment and less visible forms of agency in spite of domination. CONCLUSION: The current analysis showed different ways in which the informants constantly re-negotiated their agency in potentially abusive situations. Not only did the informants engage in reflections about immediate responses to these untoward situations, they also engaged in thoughts about strategies that could protect them and counteract abuse in health care over the long-term. This opens up for future research into ways patients organize their care and identify threats and barriers to the care they need, which could be valuable knowledge for care quality improvement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6343282
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63432822019-01-24 Re-negotiating agency – patients using comics to reflect upon acting in situations of abuse in health care Brüggemann, A. Jelmer Forsberg, Camilla Thornberg, Robert BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: There is a growing body of international research that displays the prevalence and character of abuse in health care. Even though most of these studies are conducted from a patient perspective little is known about how patients conceptualize their agency in relation to such situations. This study aimed to explore how patients reason about their potential to act in abusive situations. METHODS: Qualitative interviews were conducted with thirteen patients in Sweden. Central in the interviews were three comics, inspired by Boal’s Forum Theatre and part of an earlier online intervention study in which the informants had participated. Each comic showed a situation in which a patient feels abused, and on the opposite side were suggestions for how the patient could act in response. Informants were asked to reflect about situations of abuse and in specific upon the comics. We used the methodology of constructivist grounded theory throughout the study, including the analysis. RESULTS: It appeared that the informants constantly re-negotiated their and other patients’ agency in relation to the specifics of the event, patients’ and staff’s responsibilities, and the patients’ needs and values. This process questions views of agency as fixed and self-evident, and can be understood as part of changing discourses about patients’ social role and possibilities to organize their care. Using a feminist theory of power we expected the informants to elicit instances of resistance to domination, which is central to the comics. While doing that, the informants also hinted at parallel stories of empowerment and less visible forms of agency in spite of domination. CONCLUSION: The current analysis showed different ways in which the informants constantly re-negotiated their agency in potentially abusive situations. Not only did the informants engage in reflections about immediate responses to these untoward situations, they also engaged in thoughts about strategies that could protect them and counteract abuse in health care over the long-term. This opens up for future research into ways patients organize their care and identify threats and barriers to the care they need, which could be valuable knowledge for care quality improvement. BioMed Central 2019-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6343282/ /pubmed/30674310 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-3902-y Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Brüggemann, A. Jelmer
Forsberg, Camilla
Thornberg, Robert
Re-negotiating agency – patients using comics to reflect upon acting in situations of abuse in health care
title Re-negotiating agency – patients using comics to reflect upon acting in situations of abuse in health care
title_full Re-negotiating agency – patients using comics to reflect upon acting in situations of abuse in health care
title_fullStr Re-negotiating agency – patients using comics to reflect upon acting in situations of abuse in health care
title_full_unstemmed Re-negotiating agency – patients using comics to reflect upon acting in situations of abuse in health care
title_short Re-negotiating agency – patients using comics to reflect upon acting in situations of abuse in health care
title_sort re-negotiating agency – patients using comics to reflect upon acting in situations of abuse in health care
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6343282/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30674310
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-3902-y
work_keys_str_mv AT bruggemannajelmer renegotiatingagencypatientsusingcomicstoreflectuponactinginsituationsofabuseinhealthcare
AT forsbergcamilla renegotiatingagencypatientsusingcomicstoreflectuponactinginsituationsofabuseinhealthcare
AT thornbergrobert renegotiatingagencypatientsusingcomicstoreflectuponactinginsituationsofabuseinhealthcare