Cargando…

Prediction models for dementia and neuropathology in the oldest old: the Vantaa 85+ cohort study

BACKGROUND: We developed multifactorial models for predicting incident dementia and brain pathology in the oldest old using the Vantaa 85+ cohort. METHODS: We included participants without dementia at baseline and at least 2 years of follow-up (N = 245) for dementia prediction or with autopsy data (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hall, Anette, Pekkala, Timo, Polvikoski, Tuomo, van Gils, Mark, Kivipelto, Miia, Lötjönen, Jyrki, Mattila, Jussi, Kero, Mia, Myllykangas, Liisa, Mäkelä, Mira, Oinas, Minna, Paetau, Anders, Soininen, Hilkka, Tanskanen, Maarit, Solomon, Alina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6343349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30670070
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13195-018-0450-3
_version_ 1783389269769846784
author Hall, Anette
Pekkala, Timo
Polvikoski, Tuomo
van Gils, Mark
Kivipelto, Miia
Lötjönen, Jyrki
Mattila, Jussi
Kero, Mia
Myllykangas, Liisa
Mäkelä, Mira
Oinas, Minna
Paetau, Anders
Soininen, Hilkka
Tanskanen, Maarit
Solomon, Alina
author_facet Hall, Anette
Pekkala, Timo
Polvikoski, Tuomo
van Gils, Mark
Kivipelto, Miia
Lötjönen, Jyrki
Mattila, Jussi
Kero, Mia
Myllykangas, Liisa
Mäkelä, Mira
Oinas, Minna
Paetau, Anders
Soininen, Hilkka
Tanskanen, Maarit
Solomon, Alina
author_sort Hall, Anette
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We developed multifactorial models for predicting incident dementia and brain pathology in the oldest old using the Vantaa 85+ cohort. METHODS: We included participants without dementia at baseline and at least 2 years of follow-up (N = 245) for dementia prediction or with autopsy data (N = 163) for pathology. A supervised machine learning method was used for model development, considering sociodemographic, cognitive, clinical, vascular, and lifestyle factors, as well as APOE genotype. Neuropathological assessments included β-amyloid, neurofibrillary tangles and neuritic plaques, cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA), macro- and microscopic infarcts, α-synuclein pathology, hippocampal sclerosis, and TDP-43. RESULTS: Prediction model performance was evaluated using AUC for 10 × 10-fold cross-validation. Overall AUCs were 0.73 for dementia, 0.64–0.68 for Alzheimer’s disease (AD)- or amyloid-related pathologies, 0.72 for macroinfarcts, and 0.61 for microinfarcts. Predictors for dementia were different from those in previous reports of younger populations; for example, age, sex, and vascular and lifestyle factors were not predictive. Predictors for dementia versus pathology were also different, because cognition and education predicted dementia but not AD- or amyloid-related pathologies. APOE genotype was most consistently present across all models. APOE alleles had a different impact: ε4 did not predict dementia, but it did predict all AD- or amyloid-related pathologies; ε2 predicted dementia, but it was protective against amyloid and neuropathological AD; and ε3ε3 was protective against dementia, neurofibrillary tangles, and CAA. Very few other factors were predictive of pathology. CONCLUSIONS: Differences between predictors for dementia in younger old versus oldest old populations, as well as for dementia versus pathology, should be considered more carefully in future studies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13195-018-0450-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6343349
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63433492019-01-24 Prediction models for dementia and neuropathology in the oldest old: the Vantaa 85+ cohort study Hall, Anette Pekkala, Timo Polvikoski, Tuomo van Gils, Mark Kivipelto, Miia Lötjönen, Jyrki Mattila, Jussi Kero, Mia Myllykangas, Liisa Mäkelä, Mira Oinas, Minna Paetau, Anders Soininen, Hilkka Tanskanen, Maarit Solomon, Alina Alzheimers Res Ther Research BACKGROUND: We developed multifactorial models for predicting incident dementia and brain pathology in the oldest old using the Vantaa 85+ cohort. METHODS: We included participants without dementia at baseline and at least 2 years of follow-up (N = 245) for dementia prediction or with autopsy data (N = 163) for pathology. A supervised machine learning method was used for model development, considering sociodemographic, cognitive, clinical, vascular, and lifestyle factors, as well as APOE genotype. Neuropathological assessments included β-amyloid, neurofibrillary tangles and neuritic plaques, cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA), macro- and microscopic infarcts, α-synuclein pathology, hippocampal sclerosis, and TDP-43. RESULTS: Prediction model performance was evaluated using AUC for 10 × 10-fold cross-validation. Overall AUCs were 0.73 for dementia, 0.64–0.68 for Alzheimer’s disease (AD)- or amyloid-related pathologies, 0.72 for macroinfarcts, and 0.61 for microinfarcts. Predictors for dementia were different from those in previous reports of younger populations; for example, age, sex, and vascular and lifestyle factors were not predictive. Predictors for dementia versus pathology were also different, because cognition and education predicted dementia but not AD- or amyloid-related pathologies. APOE genotype was most consistently present across all models. APOE alleles had a different impact: ε4 did not predict dementia, but it did predict all AD- or amyloid-related pathologies; ε2 predicted dementia, but it was protective against amyloid and neuropathological AD; and ε3ε3 was protective against dementia, neurofibrillary tangles, and CAA. Very few other factors were predictive of pathology. CONCLUSIONS: Differences between predictors for dementia in younger old versus oldest old populations, as well as for dementia versus pathology, should be considered more carefully in future studies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13195-018-0450-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6343349/ /pubmed/30670070 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13195-018-0450-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Hall, Anette
Pekkala, Timo
Polvikoski, Tuomo
van Gils, Mark
Kivipelto, Miia
Lötjönen, Jyrki
Mattila, Jussi
Kero, Mia
Myllykangas, Liisa
Mäkelä, Mira
Oinas, Minna
Paetau, Anders
Soininen, Hilkka
Tanskanen, Maarit
Solomon, Alina
Prediction models for dementia and neuropathology in the oldest old: the Vantaa 85+ cohort study
title Prediction models for dementia and neuropathology in the oldest old: the Vantaa 85+ cohort study
title_full Prediction models for dementia and neuropathology in the oldest old: the Vantaa 85+ cohort study
title_fullStr Prediction models for dementia and neuropathology in the oldest old: the Vantaa 85+ cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Prediction models for dementia and neuropathology in the oldest old: the Vantaa 85+ cohort study
title_short Prediction models for dementia and neuropathology in the oldest old: the Vantaa 85+ cohort study
title_sort prediction models for dementia and neuropathology in the oldest old: the vantaa 85+ cohort study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6343349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30670070
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13195-018-0450-3
work_keys_str_mv AT hallanette predictionmodelsfordementiaandneuropathologyintheoldestoldthevantaa85cohortstudy
AT pekkalatimo predictionmodelsfordementiaandneuropathologyintheoldestoldthevantaa85cohortstudy
AT polvikoskituomo predictionmodelsfordementiaandneuropathologyintheoldestoldthevantaa85cohortstudy
AT vangilsmark predictionmodelsfordementiaandneuropathologyintheoldestoldthevantaa85cohortstudy
AT kivipeltomiia predictionmodelsfordementiaandneuropathologyintheoldestoldthevantaa85cohortstudy
AT lotjonenjyrki predictionmodelsfordementiaandneuropathologyintheoldestoldthevantaa85cohortstudy
AT mattilajussi predictionmodelsfordementiaandneuropathologyintheoldestoldthevantaa85cohortstudy
AT keromia predictionmodelsfordementiaandneuropathologyintheoldestoldthevantaa85cohortstudy
AT myllykangasliisa predictionmodelsfordementiaandneuropathologyintheoldestoldthevantaa85cohortstudy
AT makelamira predictionmodelsfordementiaandneuropathologyintheoldestoldthevantaa85cohortstudy
AT oinasminna predictionmodelsfordementiaandneuropathologyintheoldestoldthevantaa85cohortstudy
AT paetauanders predictionmodelsfordementiaandneuropathologyintheoldestoldthevantaa85cohortstudy
AT soininenhilkka predictionmodelsfordementiaandneuropathologyintheoldestoldthevantaa85cohortstudy
AT tanskanenmaarit predictionmodelsfordementiaandneuropathologyintheoldestoldthevantaa85cohortstudy
AT solomonalina predictionmodelsfordementiaandneuropathologyintheoldestoldthevantaa85cohortstudy