Cargando…
A systematic review of the quality of distal radius systematic reviews: Methodology and reporting assessment
BACKGROUND: Many systematic reviews (SRs) have been published about the various treatments for distal radius fractures (DRF). The heterogeneity of SRs results may come from the misuse of SR methods, and literature overviews have demonstrated that SRs should be considered with caution as they may not...
Autores principales: | Belloti, João Carlos, Okamura, Aldo, Scheeren, Jordana, Faloppa, Flávio, Ynoe de Moraes, Vinícius |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6343870/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30673700 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206895 |
Ejemplares similares
-
No benefit for elbow blocking on conservative treatment of distal radius fractures: A 6-month randomized controlled trial
por: Okamura, Aldo, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Above-versus below-elbow casting for conservative treatment of distal radius fractures: a randomized controlled trial and study protocol
por: Okamura, Aldo, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Prospective Non-randomized Studies in Orthopaedics and Traumatology: Systematic Assessment of its Methodological Quality()
por: Pignataro, Gustavo Soriano, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Treatment of reducible unstable fractures of the distal radius: randomized clinical study comparing the locked volar plate and external fixator methods: study protocol
por: Raduan Neto, Jorge, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
A new method for classifying distal radius fracture: the IDEAL classification()
por: Belloti, João Carlos, et al.
Publicado: (2013)