Cargando…

Opinion limits study for the multi-selection bounded confidence model

In this work, we study the opinion limit states for a generalized bounded confidence agent-based opinion model. Agents can select multiple opinions in the network, and the confidence bound is considered on the distance between the average of the selected opinions and agent opinion itself. The number...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Zhang, Jiangbo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6343907/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30673745
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210745
_version_ 1783389345107935232
author Zhang, Jiangbo
author_facet Zhang, Jiangbo
author_sort Zhang, Jiangbo
collection PubMed
description In this work, we study the opinion limit states for a generalized bounded confidence agent-based opinion model. Agents can select multiple opinions in the network, and the confidence bound is considered on the distance between the average of the selected opinions and agent opinion itself. The number of selection agents for a certain agent, which is also called the selection number, means the agent opinion interaction degree. It is known that when the confidence bound is large sufficiently, opinions reach consensus almost surely. We mainly study the opinion consensus and the opinion polarization when the confidence bound is small sufficiently. Firstly, we provide and prove the upper and lower bounds for the opinion consensus probability of this bound confidence model. It shows that the opinion consensus probability almost always decreases as the confidence bound decreases. Secondly, the opinion consensus probability is larger than the one for the opinion evolution of the Deffuant-Weisbuch model. Finally, we demonstrate the ultimate probability distribution of one agent opinion and compare it with the gossip form and the general bounded confidence form, and demonstrate how the opinion polarization probabilities evolve as the selection number changes. Specially, different from other studies, we find that the opinion polarization would happen more easily if the opinion interaction degree is strengthened. In a sum, the multiple selection mechanism will increase the opinion consensus probability and the opinion polarization probability, respectively, comparing to the single selection mechanism.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6343907
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63439072019-02-02 Opinion limits study for the multi-selection bounded confidence model Zhang, Jiangbo PLoS One Research Article In this work, we study the opinion limit states for a generalized bounded confidence agent-based opinion model. Agents can select multiple opinions in the network, and the confidence bound is considered on the distance between the average of the selected opinions and agent opinion itself. The number of selection agents for a certain agent, which is also called the selection number, means the agent opinion interaction degree. It is known that when the confidence bound is large sufficiently, opinions reach consensus almost surely. We mainly study the opinion consensus and the opinion polarization when the confidence bound is small sufficiently. Firstly, we provide and prove the upper and lower bounds for the opinion consensus probability of this bound confidence model. It shows that the opinion consensus probability almost always decreases as the confidence bound decreases. Secondly, the opinion consensus probability is larger than the one for the opinion evolution of the Deffuant-Weisbuch model. Finally, we demonstrate the ultimate probability distribution of one agent opinion and compare it with the gossip form and the general bounded confidence form, and demonstrate how the opinion polarization probabilities evolve as the selection number changes. Specially, different from other studies, we find that the opinion polarization would happen more easily if the opinion interaction degree is strengthened. In a sum, the multiple selection mechanism will increase the opinion consensus probability and the opinion polarization probability, respectively, comparing to the single selection mechanism. Public Library of Science 2019-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6343907/ /pubmed/30673745 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210745 Text en © 2019 Jiangbo Zhang http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhang, Jiangbo
Opinion limits study for the multi-selection bounded confidence model
title Opinion limits study for the multi-selection bounded confidence model
title_full Opinion limits study for the multi-selection bounded confidence model
title_fullStr Opinion limits study for the multi-selection bounded confidence model
title_full_unstemmed Opinion limits study for the multi-selection bounded confidence model
title_short Opinion limits study for the multi-selection bounded confidence model
title_sort opinion limits study for the multi-selection bounded confidence model
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6343907/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30673745
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210745
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangjiangbo opinionlimitsstudyforthemultiselectionboundedconfidencemodel