Cargando…
Opinion limits study for the multi-selection bounded confidence model
In this work, we study the opinion limit states for a generalized bounded confidence agent-based opinion model. Agents can select multiple opinions in the network, and the confidence bound is considered on the distance between the average of the selected opinions and agent opinion itself. The number...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6343907/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30673745 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210745 |
_version_ | 1783389345107935232 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Jiangbo |
author_facet | Zhang, Jiangbo |
author_sort | Zhang, Jiangbo |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this work, we study the opinion limit states for a generalized bounded confidence agent-based opinion model. Agents can select multiple opinions in the network, and the confidence bound is considered on the distance between the average of the selected opinions and agent opinion itself. The number of selection agents for a certain agent, which is also called the selection number, means the agent opinion interaction degree. It is known that when the confidence bound is large sufficiently, opinions reach consensus almost surely. We mainly study the opinion consensus and the opinion polarization when the confidence bound is small sufficiently. Firstly, we provide and prove the upper and lower bounds for the opinion consensus probability of this bound confidence model. It shows that the opinion consensus probability almost always decreases as the confidence bound decreases. Secondly, the opinion consensus probability is larger than the one for the opinion evolution of the Deffuant-Weisbuch model. Finally, we demonstrate the ultimate probability distribution of one agent opinion and compare it with the gossip form and the general bounded confidence form, and demonstrate how the opinion polarization probabilities evolve as the selection number changes. Specially, different from other studies, we find that the opinion polarization would happen more easily if the opinion interaction degree is strengthened. In a sum, the multiple selection mechanism will increase the opinion consensus probability and the opinion polarization probability, respectively, comparing to the single selection mechanism. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6343907 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63439072019-02-02 Opinion limits study for the multi-selection bounded confidence model Zhang, Jiangbo PLoS One Research Article In this work, we study the opinion limit states for a generalized bounded confidence agent-based opinion model. Agents can select multiple opinions in the network, and the confidence bound is considered on the distance between the average of the selected opinions and agent opinion itself. The number of selection agents for a certain agent, which is also called the selection number, means the agent opinion interaction degree. It is known that when the confidence bound is large sufficiently, opinions reach consensus almost surely. We mainly study the opinion consensus and the opinion polarization when the confidence bound is small sufficiently. Firstly, we provide and prove the upper and lower bounds for the opinion consensus probability of this bound confidence model. It shows that the opinion consensus probability almost always decreases as the confidence bound decreases. Secondly, the opinion consensus probability is larger than the one for the opinion evolution of the Deffuant-Weisbuch model. Finally, we demonstrate the ultimate probability distribution of one agent opinion and compare it with the gossip form and the general bounded confidence form, and demonstrate how the opinion polarization probabilities evolve as the selection number changes. Specially, different from other studies, we find that the opinion polarization would happen more easily if the opinion interaction degree is strengthened. In a sum, the multiple selection mechanism will increase the opinion consensus probability and the opinion polarization probability, respectively, comparing to the single selection mechanism. Public Library of Science 2019-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6343907/ /pubmed/30673745 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210745 Text en © 2019 Jiangbo Zhang http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Zhang, Jiangbo Opinion limits study for the multi-selection bounded confidence model |
title | Opinion limits study for the multi-selection bounded confidence model |
title_full | Opinion limits study for the multi-selection bounded confidence model |
title_fullStr | Opinion limits study for the multi-selection bounded confidence model |
title_full_unstemmed | Opinion limits study for the multi-selection bounded confidence model |
title_short | Opinion limits study for the multi-selection bounded confidence model |
title_sort | opinion limits study for the multi-selection bounded confidence model |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6343907/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30673745 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210745 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangjiangbo opinionlimitsstudyforthemultiselectionboundedconfidencemodel |