Cargando…

A comparative evaluation between dermatoglyphic patterns and different terminal planes in primary dentition

BACKGROUND: To assess the correlation between different dermatoglyphic patterns with the terminal planes in deciduous dentition. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 300 children who are 3-6 years old with complete primary dentition were recruited and the pattern of molar terminal plane was recorded in the proform...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ravindra, Vignesh, Rekha, Vishnu, Annamalai, Sankar, Sharmin, Ditto, Norouzi-Baghkomeh, Parisa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medicina Oral S.L. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6343981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30697372
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.55259
_version_ 1783389362062360576
author Ravindra, Vignesh
Rekha, Vishnu
Annamalai, Sankar
Sharmin, Ditto
Norouzi-Baghkomeh, Parisa
author_facet Ravindra, Vignesh
Rekha, Vishnu
Annamalai, Sankar
Sharmin, Ditto
Norouzi-Baghkomeh, Parisa
author_sort Ravindra, Vignesh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To assess the correlation between different dermatoglyphic patterns with the terminal planes in deciduous dentition. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 300 children who are 3-6 years old with complete primary dentition were recruited and the pattern of molar terminal plane was recorded in the proforma. Finger prints of the distal phalanges of these subjects were recorded using ink and roller method and were analysed for the finger print pattern by a forensic specialist. The pattern were classified based on classification given by Galton. The finger ridge counts were also measured. RESULTS: Ulnar loop pattern was the most predominant dermatoglyphic pattern. Absence of arch pattern in ring and little fingers of left hand and higher ridge count in left little finger when compared to the right hand were related to Mesial step. Presence of whorl pattern in both right and left middle finger and higher total finger ridge count in left hand when compared to the right hand were related to distal step. Flush terminal plane was related to absence of arc pattern in ring finger of left hand. CONCLUSIONS: Dermatoglyphics can be used as a non invasive analytical tool to predict the terminal plane in primary dentition. Key words:Dermatoglyphics, terminal planes, primary dentition.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6343981
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medicina Oral S.L.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63439812019-01-29 A comparative evaluation between dermatoglyphic patterns and different terminal planes in primary dentition Ravindra, Vignesh Rekha, Vishnu Annamalai, Sankar Sharmin, Ditto Norouzi-Baghkomeh, Parisa J Clin Exp Dent Research BACKGROUND: To assess the correlation between different dermatoglyphic patterns with the terminal planes in deciduous dentition. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 300 children who are 3-6 years old with complete primary dentition were recruited and the pattern of molar terminal plane was recorded in the proforma. Finger prints of the distal phalanges of these subjects were recorded using ink and roller method and were analysed for the finger print pattern by a forensic specialist. The pattern were classified based on classification given by Galton. The finger ridge counts were also measured. RESULTS: Ulnar loop pattern was the most predominant dermatoglyphic pattern. Absence of arch pattern in ring and little fingers of left hand and higher ridge count in left little finger when compared to the right hand were related to Mesial step. Presence of whorl pattern in both right and left middle finger and higher total finger ridge count in left hand when compared to the right hand were related to distal step. Flush terminal plane was related to absence of arc pattern in ring finger of left hand. CONCLUSIONS: Dermatoglyphics can be used as a non invasive analytical tool to predict the terminal plane in primary dentition. Key words:Dermatoglyphics, terminal planes, primary dentition. Medicina Oral S.L. 2018-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6343981/ /pubmed/30697372 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.55259 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Ravindra, Vignesh
Rekha, Vishnu
Annamalai, Sankar
Sharmin, Ditto
Norouzi-Baghkomeh, Parisa
A comparative evaluation between dermatoglyphic patterns and different terminal planes in primary dentition
title A comparative evaluation between dermatoglyphic patterns and different terminal planes in primary dentition
title_full A comparative evaluation between dermatoglyphic patterns and different terminal planes in primary dentition
title_fullStr A comparative evaluation between dermatoglyphic patterns and different terminal planes in primary dentition
title_full_unstemmed A comparative evaluation between dermatoglyphic patterns and different terminal planes in primary dentition
title_short A comparative evaluation between dermatoglyphic patterns and different terminal planes in primary dentition
title_sort comparative evaluation between dermatoglyphic patterns and different terminal planes in primary dentition
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6343981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30697372
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.55259
work_keys_str_mv AT ravindravignesh acomparativeevaluationbetweendermatoglyphicpatternsanddifferentterminalplanesinprimarydentition
AT rekhavishnu acomparativeevaluationbetweendermatoglyphicpatternsanddifferentterminalplanesinprimarydentition
AT annamalaisankar acomparativeevaluationbetweendermatoglyphicpatternsanddifferentterminalplanesinprimarydentition
AT sharminditto acomparativeevaluationbetweendermatoglyphicpatternsanddifferentterminalplanesinprimarydentition
AT norouzibaghkomehparisa acomparativeevaluationbetweendermatoglyphicpatternsanddifferentterminalplanesinprimarydentition
AT ravindravignesh comparativeevaluationbetweendermatoglyphicpatternsanddifferentterminalplanesinprimarydentition
AT rekhavishnu comparativeevaluationbetweendermatoglyphicpatternsanddifferentterminalplanesinprimarydentition
AT annamalaisankar comparativeevaluationbetweendermatoglyphicpatternsanddifferentterminalplanesinprimarydentition
AT sharminditto comparativeevaluationbetweendermatoglyphicpatternsanddifferentterminalplanesinprimarydentition
AT norouzibaghkomehparisa comparativeevaluationbetweendermatoglyphicpatternsanddifferentterminalplanesinprimarydentition