Cargando…
A comparative evaluation between dermatoglyphic patterns and different terminal planes in primary dentition
BACKGROUND: To assess the correlation between different dermatoglyphic patterns with the terminal planes in deciduous dentition. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 300 children who are 3-6 years old with complete primary dentition were recruited and the pattern of molar terminal plane was recorded in the proform...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medicina Oral S.L.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6343981/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30697372 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.55259 |
_version_ | 1783389362062360576 |
---|---|
author | Ravindra, Vignesh Rekha, Vishnu Annamalai, Sankar Sharmin, Ditto Norouzi-Baghkomeh, Parisa |
author_facet | Ravindra, Vignesh Rekha, Vishnu Annamalai, Sankar Sharmin, Ditto Norouzi-Baghkomeh, Parisa |
author_sort | Ravindra, Vignesh |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To assess the correlation between different dermatoglyphic patterns with the terminal planes in deciduous dentition. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 300 children who are 3-6 years old with complete primary dentition were recruited and the pattern of molar terminal plane was recorded in the proforma. Finger prints of the distal phalanges of these subjects were recorded using ink and roller method and were analysed for the finger print pattern by a forensic specialist. The pattern were classified based on classification given by Galton. The finger ridge counts were also measured. RESULTS: Ulnar loop pattern was the most predominant dermatoglyphic pattern. Absence of arch pattern in ring and little fingers of left hand and higher ridge count in left little finger when compared to the right hand were related to Mesial step. Presence of whorl pattern in both right and left middle finger and higher total finger ridge count in left hand when compared to the right hand were related to distal step. Flush terminal plane was related to absence of arc pattern in ring finger of left hand. CONCLUSIONS: Dermatoglyphics can be used as a non invasive analytical tool to predict the terminal plane in primary dentition. Key words:Dermatoglyphics, terminal planes, primary dentition. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6343981 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Medicina Oral S.L. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63439812019-01-29 A comparative evaluation between dermatoglyphic patterns and different terminal planes in primary dentition Ravindra, Vignesh Rekha, Vishnu Annamalai, Sankar Sharmin, Ditto Norouzi-Baghkomeh, Parisa J Clin Exp Dent Research BACKGROUND: To assess the correlation between different dermatoglyphic patterns with the terminal planes in deciduous dentition. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 300 children who are 3-6 years old with complete primary dentition were recruited and the pattern of molar terminal plane was recorded in the proforma. Finger prints of the distal phalanges of these subjects were recorded using ink and roller method and were analysed for the finger print pattern by a forensic specialist. The pattern were classified based on classification given by Galton. The finger ridge counts were also measured. RESULTS: Ulnar loop pattern was the most predominant dermatoglyphic pattern. Absence of arch pattern in ring and little fingers of left hand and higher ridge count in left little finger when compared to the right hand were related to Mesial step. Presence of whorl pattern in both right and left middle finger and higher total finger ridge count in left hand when compared to the right hand were related to distal step. Flush terminal plane was related to absence of arc pattern in ring finger of left hand. CONCLUSIONS: Dermatoglyphics can be used as a non invasive analytical tool to predict the terminal plane in primary dentition. Key words:Dermatoglyphics, terminal planes, primary dentition. Medicina Oral S.L. 2018-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6343981/ /pubmed/30697372 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.55259 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Ravindra, Vignesh Rekha, Vishnu Annamalai, Sankar Sharmin, Ditto Norouzi-Baghkomeh, Parisa A comparative evaluation between dermatoglyphic patterns and different terminal planes in primary dentition |
title | A comparative evaluation between dermatoglyphic patterns and different terminal planes in primary dentition |
title_full | A comparative evaluation between dermatoglyphic patterns and different terminal planes in primary dentition |
title_fullStr | A comparative evaluation between dermatoglyphic patterns and different terminal planes in primary dentition |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparative evaluation between dermatoglyphic patterns and different terminal planes in primary dentition |
title_short | A comparative evaluation between dermatoglyphic patterns and different terminal planes in primary dentition |
title_sort | comparative evaluation between dermatoglyphic patterns and different terminal planes in primary dentition |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6343981/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30697372 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.55259 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ravindravignesh acomparativeevaluationbetweendermatoglyphicpatternsanddifferentterminalplanesinprimarydentition AT rekhavishnu acomparativeevaluationbetweendermatoglyphicpatternsanddifferentterminalplanesinprimarydentition AT annamalaisankar acomparativeevaluationbetweendermatoglyphicpatternsanddifferentterminalplanesinprimarydentition AT sharminditto acomparativeevaluationbetweendermatoglyphicpatternsanddifferentterminalplanesinprimarydentition AT norouzibaghkomehparisa acomparativeevaluationbetweendermatoglyphicpatternsanddifferentterminalplanesinprimarydentition AT ravindravignesh comparativeevaluationbetweendermatoglyphicpatternsanddifferentterminalplanesinprimarydentition AT rekhavishnu comparativeevaluationbetweendermatoglyphicpatternsanddifferentterminalplanesinprimarydentition AT annamalaisankar comparativeevaluationbetweendermatoglyphicpatternsanddifferentterminalplanesinprimarydentition AT sharminditto comparativeevaluationbetweendermatoglyphicpatternsanddifferentterminalplanesinprimarydentition AT norouzibaghkomehparisa comparativeevaluationbetweendermatoglyphicpatternsanddifferentterminalplanesinprimarydentition |