Cargando…

The assesment of relationship between the angulation of impacted mandibular third molar teeth and the thickness of lingual bone: A prospective clinical study

BACKGROUND: Our purpose was to investigate the relationship between the angulation of mandibular third molars and the thickness of the lingual bone, which can affect the risk of lingual nerve damage during lower third molars surgical extraction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study consisted of 104 pati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Menziletoglu, Dilek, Tassoker, Melek, Kubilay-Isik, Bozkurt, Esen, Alparslan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medicina Oral S.L. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6344005/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30573722
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.22596
_version_ 1783389367714185216
author Menziletoglu, Dilek
Tassoker, Melek
Kubilay-Isik, Bozkurt
Esen, Alparslan
author_facet Menziletoglu, Dilek
Tassoker, Melek
Kubilay-Isik, Bozkurt
Esen, Alparslan
author_sort Menziletoglu, Dilek
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Our purpose was to investigate the relationship between the angulation of mandibular third molars and the thickness of the lingual bone, which can affect the risk of lingual nerve damage during lower third molars surgical extraction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study consisted of 104 patients (42 males and 62 females), aged between 18-42 years (24.67 ± 6.11 years). Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) images were taken for preoperative assessment. The teeth were divided into four groups according to their positions: mesioangular, distoangular, vertical and horizontal. Lingual bone thickness around impacted teeth were measured at three points: cementoenamel junction (CEJ) of the mandibular second molar, mid-root of the impacted third molar, and apex of the impacted third molar root. Two predisposing factors of lingual nerve damage were recorded: lingual bone perforated by the impacted tooth and lingual bone thinner than 1 mm. Additionally, buccolingual angulations of the teeth in each group were measured. Impacted mandibular third molars were removed in usual way. One week after surgery, the patients were evaluated regarding lingual nerve paresthesia. RESULTS: None of the 104 patients experienced paresthesia, including the ones who had teeth with close proximity with lingual nerve. The mean thickness of bone was 1.21±0.63 mm at CEJ of the second molar; 1.25±1.02 mm at the mid-root; and 1.06±1.31 mm at the apex. Horizontally impacted teeth had thinner lingual bone at mid-root level (p=0.016). Buccolingual angulated teeth were more often associated with perforated lingual bone (p=0.002). Buccolingual and mesial/distal angulation had negative correlation with lingual bone thickness (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: As the buccolingual and mesiodistal angulations increase, lingual bone thickness decreases. Horizontally impacted teeth seemed to compromise the integrity of the lingual bone more than impacted teeth in other positions. During the surgery, thin or perforated lingual bone may result in displacement of the impacted tooth lingually. Key words:Lingual bone, impacted third molar, cone beam computed tomography, angulation, paresthesia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6344005
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Medicina Oral S.L.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63440052019-01-29 The assesment of relationship between the angulation of impacted mandibular third molar teeth and the thickness of lingual bone: A prospective clinical study Menziletoglu, Dilek Tassoker, Melek Kubilay-Isik, Bozkurt Esen, Alparslan Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal Research BACKGROUND: Our purpose was to investigate the relationship between the angulation of mandibular third molars and the thickness of the lingual bone, which can affect the risk of lingual nerve damage during lower third molars surgical extraction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study consisted of 104 patients (42 males and 62 females), aged between 18-42 years (24.67 ± 6.11 years). Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) images were taken for preoperative assessment. The teeth were divided into four groups according to their positions: mesioangular, distoangular, vertical and horizontal. Lingual bone thickness around impacted teeth were measured at three points: cementoenamel junction (CEJ) of the mandibular second molar, mid-root of the impacted third molar, and apex of the impacted third molar root. Two predisposing factors of lingual nerve damage were recorded: lingual bone perforated by the impacted tooth and lingual bone thinner than 1 mm. Additionally, buccolingual angulations of the teeth in each group were measured. Impacted mandibular third molars were removed in usual way. One week after surgery, the patients were evaluated regarding lingual nerve paresthesia. RESULTS: None of the 104 patients experienced paresthesia, including the ones who had teeth with close proximity with lingual nerve. The mean thickness of bone was 1.21±0.63 mm at CEJ of the second molar; 1.25±1.02 mm at the mid-root; and 1.06±1.31 mm at the apex. Horizontally impacted teeth had thinner lingual bone at mid-root level (p=0.016). Buccolingual angulated teeth were more often associated with perforated lingual bone (p=0.002). Buccolingual and mesial/distal angulation had negative correlation with lingual bone thickness (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: As the buccolingual and mesiodistal angulations increase, lingual bone thickness decreases. Horizontally impacted teeth seemed to compromise the integrity of the lingual bone more than impacted teeth in other positions. During the surgery, thin or perforated lingual bone may result in displacement of the impacted tooth lingually. Key words:Lingual bone, impacted third molar, cone beam computed tomography, angulation, paresthesia. Medicina Oral S.L. 2019-01 2018-12-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6344005/ /pubmed/30573722 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.22596 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Menziletoglu, Dilek
Tassoker, Melek
Kubilay-Isik, Bozkurt
Esen, Alparslan
The assesment of relationship between the angulation of impacted mandibular third molar teeth and the thickness of lingual bone: A prospective clinical study
title The assesment of relationship between the angulation of impacted mandibular third molar teeth and the thickness of lingual bone: A prospective clinical study
title_full The assesment of relationship between the angulation of impacted mandibular third molar teeth and the thickness of lingual bone: A prospective clinical study
title_fullStr The assesment of relationship between the angulation of impacted mandibular third molar teeth and the thickness of lingual bone: A prospective clinical study
title_full_unstemmed The assesment of relationship between the angulation of impacted mandibular third molar teeth and the thickness of lingual bone: A prospective clinical study
title_short The assesment of relationship between the angulation of impacted mandibular third molar teeth and the thickness of lingual bone: A prospective clinical study
title_sort assesment of relationship between the angulation of impacted mandibular third molar teeth and the thickness of lingual bone: a prospective clinical study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6344005/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30573722
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.22596
work_keys_str_mv AT menziletogludilek theassesmentofrelationshipbetweentheangulationofimpactedmandibularthirdmolarteethandthethicknessoflingualboneaprospectiveclinicalstudy
AT tassokermelek theassesmentofrelationshipbetweentheangulationofimpactedmandibularthirdmolarteethandthethicknessoflingualboneaprospectiveclinicalstudy
AT kubilayisikbozkurt theassesmentofrelationshipbetweentheangulationofimpactedmandibularthirdmolarteethandthethicknessoflingualboneaprospectiveclinicalstudy
AT esenalparslan theassesmentofrelationshipbetweentheangulationofimpactedmandibularthirdmolarteethandthethicknessoflingualboneaprospectiveclinicalstudy
AT menziletogludilek assesmentofrelationshipbetweentheangulationofimpactedmandibularthirdmolarteethandthethicknessoflingualboneaprospectiveclinicalstudy
AT tassokermelek assesmentofrelationshipbetweentheangulationofimpactedmandibularthirdmolarteethandthethicknessoflingualboneaprospectiveclinicalstudy
AT kubilayisikbozkurt assesmentofrelationshipbetweentheangulationofimpactedmandibularthirdmolarteethandthethicknessoflingualboneaprospectiveclinicalstudy
AT esenalparslan assesmentofrelationshipbetweentheangulationofimpactedmandibularthirdmolarteethandthethicknessoflingualboneaprospectiveclinicalstudy