Cargando…

Anterior decompression and fusion versus laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy due to ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Both anterior decompression and fusion (ADF) and laminoplasty (LAMP) are frequently used for the treatment of cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). However, some controversies still remained in surgical options. We investigated whether ADF...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Tao-ping, Qian, Li-gang, Jiao, Jian-bao, Li, Qing-gui, Sun, Bo, Chen, Kang, Wang, Yun-fei, Liang, Zhi-xing, Chen, Yu-min, Meng, Jie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6344170/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30608381
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000013382
_version_ 1783389393016324096
author Chen, Tao-ping
Qian, Li-gang
Jiao, Jian-bao
Li, Qing-gui
Sun, Bo
Chen, Kang
Wang, Yun-fei
Liang, Zhi-xing
Chen, Yu-min
Meng, Jie
author_facet Chen, Tao-ping
Qian, Li-gang
Jiao, Jian-bao
Li, Qing-gui
Sun, Bo
Chen, Kang
Wang, Yun-fei
Liang, Zhi-xing
Chen, Yu-min
Meng, Jie
author_sort Chen, Tao-ping
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Both anterior decompression and fusion (ADF) and laminoplasty (LAMP) are frequently used for the treatment of cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). However, some controversies still remained in surgical options. We investigated whether ADF had better neurological outcome than LAMP in the treatment of cervical myelopathy due to OPLL. Secondary outcomes included operation time, blood loss, rate of complication and reoperation. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials database were searched to identify potential clinical studies compared ADF with LAMP for treatment of cervical myelopathy owing to OPLL. We also manually searched the reference lists of articles and reviews for possible relevant studies. Quality assessment was performed according to Cochrane Handbook and meta-analysis was conducted using Stata 12.0 software. RESULTS: Nine studies involving 712 patients were finally included in this analysis. Compared with LAMP, ADF was associated with an increase of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score (WMD = 1.86, 95% CI 0.43 to 3.29, P = .011) and recovery JOA score at final follow-up (WMD = 30.94, 95% CI 20.56 to 41.33, P = .000). And, ADF was associated with a decrease of the late neurologic deterioration than LAMP group (RR = 0.34, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.92, P = .003). However, ADF was associated with an increase of the postoperative cervical lordosis (WMD = 4.47, 95% CI 1.58 to 7.36, P = .002) than LAMP. There was no significant difference between the complication, reoperation rate (P > .05). What's more, ADF was associated with an increase of the operation time than LAMP (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: ADF yields better neurological improvement, but higher cervical lordosis and longer operation time compared with LAMP for cervical myelopathy caused by OPLL. No significant difference was found in the complication and re-operation rate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6344170
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63441702019-02-04 Anterior decompression and fusion versus laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy due to ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament: A meta-analysis Chen, Tao-ping Qian, Li-gang Jiao, Jian-bao Li, Qing-gui Sun, Bo Chen, Kang Wang, Yun-fei Liang, Zhi-xing Chen, Yu-min Meng, Jie Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article BACKGROUND: Both anterior decompression and fusion (ADF) and laminoplasty (LAMP) are frequently used for the treatment of cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). However, some controversies still remained in surgical options. We investigated whether ADF had better neurological outcome than LAMP in the treatment of cervical myelopathy due to OPLL. Secondary outcomes included operation time, blood loss, rate of complication and reoperation. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials database were searched to identify potential clinical studies compared ADF with LAMP for treatment of cervical myelopathy owing to OPLL. We also manually searched the reference lists of articles and reviews for possible relevant studies. Quality assessment was performed according to Cochrane Handbook and meta-analysis was conducted using Stata 12.0 software. RESULTS: Nine studies involving 712 patients were finally included in this analysis. Compared with LAMP, ADF was associated with an increase of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score (WMD = 1.86, 95% CI 0.43 to 3.29, P = .011) and recovery JOA score at final follow-up (WMD = 30.94, 95% CI 20.56 to 41.33, P = .000). And, ADF was associated with a decrease of the late neurologic deterioration than LAMP group (RR = 0.34, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.92, P = .003). However, ADF was associated with an increase of the postoperative cervical lordosis (WMD = 4.47, 95% CI 1.58 to 7.36, P = .002) than LAMP. There was no significant difference between the complication, reoperation rate (P > .05). What's more, ADF was associated with an increase of the operation time than LAMP (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: ADF yields better neurological improvement, but higher cervical lordosis and longer operation time compared with LAMP for cervical myelopathy caused by OPLL. No significant difference was found in the complication and re-operation rate. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6344170/ /pubmed/30608381 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000013382 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
spellingShingle Research Article
Chen, Tao-ping
Qian, Li-gang
Jiao, Jian-bao
Li, Qing-gui
Sun, Bo
Chen, Kang
Wang, Yun-fei
Liang, Zhi-xing
Chen, Yu-min
Meng, Jie
Anterior decompression and fusion versus laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy due to ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament: A meta-analysis
title Anterior decompression and fusion versus laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy due to ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament: A meta-analysis
title_full Anterior decompression and fusion versus laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy due to ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament: A meta-analysis
title_fullStr Anterior decompression and fusion versus laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy due to ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament: A meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Anterior decompression and fusion versus laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy due to ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament: A meta-analysis
title_short Anterior decompression and fusion versus laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy due to ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament: A meta-analysis
title_sort anterior decompression and fusion versus laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy due to ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament: a meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6344170/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30608381
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000013382
work_keys_str_mv AT chentaoping anteriordecompressionandfusionversuslaminoplastyforcervicalmyelopathyduetoossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligamentametaanalysis
AT qianligang anteriordecompressionandfusionversuslaminoplastyforcervicalmyelopathyduetoossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligamentametaanalysis
AT jiaojianbao anteriordecompressionandfusionversuslaminoplastyforcervicalmyelopathyduetoossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligamentametaanalysis
AT liqinggui anteriordecompressionandfusionversuslaminoplastyforcervicalmyelopathyduetoossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligamentametaanalysis
AT sunbo anteriordecompressionandfusionversuslaminoplastyforcervicalmyelopathyduetoossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligamentametaanalysis
AT chenkang anteriordecompressionandfusionversuslaminoplastyforcervicalmyelopathyduetoossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligamentametaanalysis
AT wangyunfei anteriordecompressionandfusionversuslaminoplastyforcervicalmyelopathyduetoossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligamentametaanalysis
AT liangzhixing anteriordecompressionandfusionversuslaminoplastyforcervicalmyelopathyduetoossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligamentametaanalysis
AT chenyumin anteriordecompressionandfusionversuslaminoplastyforcervicalmyelopathyduetoossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligamentametaanalysis
AT mengjie anteriordecompressionandfusionversuslaminoplastyforcervicalmyelopathyduetoossificationofposteriorlongitudinalligamentametaanalysis