Cargando…
Differentiation between hepatic cystic echinococcosis types 1 and simple hepatic cysts: A retrospective analysis
This study aims to evaluate the clinic value of ultrasound, computed tomography (CT) and serological testing in the differentiation between hepatic Cystic Echinococcosis (CE) types 1 and simple hepatic cysts. Totally 50 patients with CE Types 1 and 50 patients with simple hepatic cysts were included...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6344192/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30608385 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000013731 |
_version_ | 1783389398096674816 |
---|---|
author | Ran, Bo Aji, Tuerganaili Jiang, Tieming Zhang, Ruiqing Guo, Qiang Abulizi, Abuduaini Yimiti, Yusfu Wen, Hao Shao, Yingmei |
author_facet | Ran, Bo Aji, Tuerganaili Jiang, Tieming Zhang, Ruiqing Guo, Qiang Abulizi, Abuduaini Yimiti, Yusfu Wen, Hao Shao, Yingmei |
author_sort | Ran, Bo |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study aims to evaluate the clinic value of ultrasound, computed tomography (CT) and serological testing in the differentiation between hepatic Cystic Echinococcosis (CE) types 1 and simple hepatic cysts. Totally 50 patients with CE Types 1 and 50 patients with simple hepatic cysts were included. All patients examined by ultrasound, CT and serological testing respectively. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of diagnosis methods was drawn and their sensitivity, specificity, Youden index, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were compared. Pathology result was used as golden standard. The area under ROC curve of ultrasound was 0.97 and of CT and serological testing was 0.79 and 0.71 respectively. The sensitivity of ultrasound in the diagnosis of CE Types 1 was 96.00%, specificity was 98.00%, the positive likelihood ratio was 48.00, and negative likelihood ratio was 0.04. Disease prevalence was 50%, positive predictive value was 97.96%, and negative predictive value was 96.08%. The sensitivity of CT was 80.00%, specificity was 62.00%, positive likelihood ratio was 2.11, and negative likelihood ratio was 0.32. Disease prevalence was 50%, positive predictive value was 67.80%, and negative predictive value was 75.61%. The sensitivity of immunological test was 86.00%, specificity was 72.00%, positive likelihood ratio was 3.07, and negative likelihood ratio was 0.19. Disease prevalence was 50%, positive predictive value was 75.44%, and negative predictive value was 83.72%. Combined ultrasound and immunological test, the sensitivity and the specificity was 82% and 100% respectively. Combined CT and immunological test, the sensitivity the specificity was 70% and 82% respectively. In the differentiate diagnosis of CE Types 1 and simple hepatic cyst, ultrasound is better than CT with high sensitivity and specificity, therefore recommended. Immunological examination is an important complement to the imaging examination. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6344192 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63441922019-02-04 Differentiation between hepatic cystic echinococcosis types 1 and simple hepatic cysts: A retrospective analysis Ran, Bo Aji, Tuerganaili Jiang, Tieming Zhang, Ruiqing Guo, Qiang Abulizi, Abuduaini Yimiti, Yusfu Wen, Hao Shao, Yingmei Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article This study aims to evaluate the clinic value of ultrasound, computed tomography (CT) and serological testing in the differentiation between hepatic Cystic Echinococcosis (CE) types 1 and simple hepatic cysts. Totally 50 patients with CE Types 1 and 50 patients with simple hepatic cysts were included. All patients examined by ultrasound, CT and serological testing respectively. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of diagnosis methods was drawn and their sensitivity, specificity, Youden index, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were compared. Pathology result was used as golden standard. The area under ROC curve of ultrasound was 0.97 and of CT and serological testing was 0.79 and 0.71 respectively. The sensitivity of ultrasound in the diagnosis of CE Types 1 was 96.00%, specificity was 98.00%, the positive likelihood ratio was 48.00, and negative likelihood ratio was 0.04. Disease prevalence was 50%, positive predictive value was 97.96%, and negative predictive value was 96.08%. The sensitivity of CT was 80.00%, specificity was 62.00%, positive likelihood ratio was 2.11, and negative likelihood ratio was 0.32. Disease prevalence was 50%, positive predictive value was 67.80%, and negative predictive value was 75.61%. The sensitivity of immunological test was 86.00%, specificity was 72.00%, positive likelihood ratio was 3.07, and negative likelihood ratio was 0.19. Disease prevalence was 50%, positive predictive value was 75.44%, and negative predictive value was 83.72%. Combined ultrasound and immunological test, the sensitivity and the specificity was 82% and 100% respectively. Combined CT and immunological test, the sensitivity the specificity was 70% and 82% respectively. In the differentiate diagnosis of CE Types 1 and simple hepatic cyst, ultrasound is better than CT with high sensitivity and specificity, therefore recommended. Immunological examination is an important complement to the imaging examination. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6344192/ /pubmed/30608385 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000013731 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ran, Bo Aji, Tuerganaili Jiang, Tieming Zhang, Ruiqing Guo, Qiang Abulizi, Abuduaini Yimiti, Yusfu Wen, Hao Shao, Yingmei Differentiation between hepatic cystic echinococcosis types 1 and simple hepatic cysts: A retrospective analysis |
title | Differentiation between hepatic cystic echinococcosis types 1 and simple hepatic cysts: A retrospective analysis |
title_full | Differentiation between hepatic cystic echinococcosis types 1 and simple hepatic cysts: A retrospective analysis |
title_fullStr | Differentiation between hepatic cystic echinococcosis types 1 and simple hepatic cysts: A retrospective analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Differentiation between hepatic cystic echinococcosis types 1 and simple hepatic cysts: A retrospective analysis |
title_short | Differentiation between hepatic cystic echinococcosis types 1 and simple hepatic cysts: A retrospective analysis |
title_sort | differentiation between hepatic cystic echinococcosis types 1 and simple hepatic cysts: a retrospective analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6344192/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30608385 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000013731 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ranbo differentiationbetweenhepaticcysticechinococcosistypes1andsimplehepaticcystsaretrospectiveanalysis AT ajituerganaili differentiationbetweenhepaticcysticechinococcosistypes1andsimplehepaticcystsaretrospectiveanalysis AT jiangtieming differentiationbetweenhepaticcysticechinococcosistypes1andsimplehepaticcystsaretrospectiveanalysis AT zhangruiqing differentiationbetweenhepaticcysticechinococcosistypes1andsimplehepaticcystsaretrospectiveanalysis AT guoqiang differentiationbetweenhepaticcysticechinococcosistypes1andsimplehepaticcystsaretrospectiveanalysis AT abuliziabuduaini differentiationbetweenhepaticcysticechinococcosistypes1andsimplehepaticcystsaretrospectiveanalysis AT yimitiyusfu differentiationbetweenhepaticcysticechinococcosistypes1andsimplehepaticcystsaretrospectiveanalysis AT wenhao differentiationbetweenhepaticcysticechinococcosistypes1andsimplehepaticcystsaretrospectiveanalysis AT shaoyingmei differentiationbetweenhepaticcysticechinococcosistypes1andsimplehepaticcystsaretrospectiveanalysis |