Cargando…

Effects of dog-assisted therapy in adults with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Dog-assisted therapy (DAT) is a non-pharmacological intervention based on the interaction between patients and dogs, which has been proposed to help adults with dementia. However, evidence to support it is lacking. Thus, we aim to evaluate the effects of DAT on this population and to ass...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zafra-Tanaka, Jessica Hanae, Pacheco-Barrios, Kevin, Tellez, Walter Andree, Taype-Rondan, Alvaro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6345014/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30678665
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-018-2009-z
_version_ 1783389508952129536
author Zafra-Tanaka, Jessica Hanae
Pacheco-Barrios, Kevin
Tellez, Walter Andree
Taype-Rondan, Alvaro
author_facet Zafra-Tanaka, Jessica Hanae
Pacheco-Barrios, Kevin
Tellez, Walter Andree
Taype-Rondan, Alvaro
author_sort Zafra-Tanaka, Jessica Hanae
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Dog-assisted therapy (DAT) is a non-pharmacological intervention based on the interaction between patients and dogs, which has been proposed to help adults with dementia. However, evidence to support it is lacking. Thus, we aim to evaluate the effects of DAT on this population and to assess the certainty of the evidence of the RCTs estimates. METHODS: A systematic search was performed. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-experimental (QE) controlled studies published up to March 2018, which evaluated the beneficial and deleterious effects of DAT in adults with dementia. Mean differences (MD) or standardized mean differences (SMD) and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated and random effects meta-analyses were performed. Certainty of evidence was assessed for RCTs estimates using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. The study protocol has been registered in PROSPERO (CRD42018090434). RESULTS: Ten studies (six RCTs and four QE controlled studies) were eligible for inclusion. Meta-analysis of RCTs showed no effect of DAT in daily life activities (SMD: 0.16; 95% CI: -0.80 to 1.12), depression (SMD: -0.45; 95% CI: -2.81 to 1.91), agitation (SDM: -1.12; 95% CI: -2.67 to 0.43), quality of life (SDM: 0.16; 95% CI: -0.41 to 0.73), and cognitive impairment (SDM: -0.52; 95% CI: -1.33 to 0.30), but it found a beneficial effect in apathy (1 study, n = 37, MD: 1.81; 95% CI: 1.26 to 2.36). All outcomes had a very low certainty of evidence according to GRADE methodology. CONCLUSIONS: RCTs evidence of very low certainty suggests that, in adults with dementia, DAT has no effect in daily life activities, depression, agitation, quality of life, and cognitive impairment, although one small study found an apparent beneficial effect in apathy. More well-designed and correctly reported studies are needed in order to provide a conclusion. TRIAL REGISTRATION: CRD42018090434 (PROSPERO). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12888-018-2009-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6345014
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63450142019-01-29 Effects of dog-assisted therapy in adults with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis Zafra-Tanaka, Jessica Hanae Pacheco-Barrios, Kevin Tellez, Walter Andree Taype-Rondan, Alvaro BMC Psychiatry Research Article BACKGROUND: Dog-assisted therapy (DAT) is a non-pharmacological intervention based on the interaction between patients and dogs, which has been proposed to help adults with dementia. However, evidence to support it is lacking. Thus, we aim to evaluate the effects of DAT on this population and to assess the certainty of the evidence of the RCTs estimates. METHODS: A systematic search was performed. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-experimental (QE) controlled studies published up to March 2018, which evaluated the beneficial and deleterious effects of DAT in adults with dementia. Mean differences (MD) or standardized mean differences (SMD) and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated and random effects meta-analyses were performed. Certainty of evidence was assessed for RCTs estimates using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. The study protocol has been registered in PROSPERO (CRD42018090434). RESULTS: Ten studies (six RCTs and four QE controlled studies) were eligible for inclusion. Meta-analysis of RCTs showed no effect of DAT in daily life activities (SMD: 0.16; 95% CI: -0.80 to 1.12), depression (SMD: -0.45; 95% CI: -2.81 to 1.91), agitation (SDM: -1.12; 95% CI: -2.67 to 0.43), quality of life (SDM: 0.16; 95% CI: -0.41 to 0.73), and cognitive impairment (SDM: -0.52; 95% CI: -1.33 to 0.30), but it found a beneficial effect in apathy (1 study, n = 37, MD: 1.81; 95% CI: 1.26 to 2.36). All outcomes had a very low certainty of evidence according to GRADE methodology. CONCLUSIONS: RCTs evidence of very low certainty suggests that, in adults with dementia, DAT has no effect in daily life activities, depression, agitation, quality of life, and cognitive impairment, although one small study found an apparent beneficial effect in apathy. More well-designed and correctly reported studies are needed in order to provide a conclusion. TRIAL REGISTRATION: CRD42018090434 (PROSPERO). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12888-018-2009-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6345014/ /pubmed/30678665 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-018-2009-z Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zafra-Tanaka, Jessica Hanae
Pacheco-Barrios, Kevin
Tellez, Walter Andree
Taype-Rondan, Alvaro
Effects of dog-assisted therapy in adults with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Effects of dog-assisted therapy in adults with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Effects of dog-assisted therapy in adults with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Effects of dog-assisted therapy in adults with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Effects of dog-assisted therapy in adults with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Effects of dog-assisted therapy in adults with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort effects of dog-assisted therapy in adults with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6345014/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30678665
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-018-2009-z
work_keys_str_mv AT zafratanakajessicahanae effectsofdogassistedtherapyinadultswithdementiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT pachecobarrioskevin effectsofdogassistedtherapyinadultswithdementiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT tellezwalterandree effectsofdogassistedtherapyinadultswithdementiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT tayperondanalvaro effectsofdogassistedtherapyinadultswithdementiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis