Cargando…
Effects of dog-assisted therapy in adults with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Dog-assisted therapy (DAT) is a non-pharmacological intervention based on the interaction between patients and dogs, which has been proposed to help adults with dementia. However, evidence to support it is lacking. Thus, we aim to evaluate the effects of DAT on this population and to ass...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6345014/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30678665 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-018-2009-z |
_version_ | 1783389508952129536 |
---|---|
author | Zafra-Tanaka, Jessica Hanae Pacheco-Barrios, Kevin Tellez, Walter Andree Taype-Rondan, Alvaro |
author_facet | Zafra-Tanaka, Jessica Hanae Pacheco-Barrios, Kevin Tellez, Walter Andree Taype-Rondan, Alvaro |
author_sort | Zafra-Tanaka, Jessica Hanae |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Dog-assisted therapy (DAT) is a non-pharmacological intervention based on the interaction between patients and dogs, which has been proposed to help adults with dementia. However, evidence to support it is lacking. Thus, we aim to evaluate the effects of DAT on this population and to assess the certainty of the evidence of the RCTs estimates. METHODS: A systematic search was performed. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-experimental (QE) controlled studies published up to March 2018, which evaluated the beneficial and deleterious effects of DAT in adults with dementia. Mean differences (MD) or standardized mean differences (SMD) and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated and random effects meta-analyses were performed. Certainty of evidence was assessed for RCTs estimates using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. The study protocol has been registered in PROSPERO (CRD42018090434). RESULTS: Ten studies (six RCTs and four QE controlled studies) were eligible for inclusion. Meta-analysis of RCTs showed no effect of DAT in daily life activities (SMD: 0.16; 95% CI: -0.80 to 1.12), depression (SMD: -0.45; 95% CI: -2.81 to 1.91), agitation (SDM: -1.12; 95% CI: -2.67 to 0.43), quality of life (SDM: 0.16; 95% CI: -0.41 to 0.73), and cognitive impairment (SDM: -0.52; 95% CI: -1.33 to 0.30), but it found a beneficial effect in apathy (1 study, n = 37, MD: 1.81; 95% CI: 1.26 to 2.36). All outcomes had a very low certainty of evidence according to GRADE methodology. CONCLUSIONS: RCTs evidence of very low certainty suggests that, in adults with dementia, DAT has no effect in daily life activities, depression, agitation, quality of life, and cognitive impairment, although one small study found an apparent beneficial effect in apathy. More well-designed and correctly reported studies are needed in order to provide a conclusion. TRIAL REGISTRATION: CRD42018090434 (PROSPERO). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12888-018-2009-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6345014 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63450142019-01-29 Effects of dog-assisted therapy in adults with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis Zafra-Tanaka, Jessica Hanae Pacheco-Barrios, Kevin Tellez, Walter Andree Taype-Rondan, Alvaro BMC Psychiatry Research Article BACKGROUND: Dog-assisted therapy (DAT) is a non-pharmacological intervention based on the interaction between patients and dogs, which has been proposed to help adults with dementia. However, evidence to support it is lacking. Thus, we aim to evaluate the effects of DAT on this population and to assess the certainty of the evidence of the RCTs estimates. METHODS: A systematic search was performed. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-experimental (QE) controlled studies published up to March 2018, which evaluated the beneficial and deleterious effects of DAT in adults with dementia. Mean differences (MD) or standardized mean differences (SMD) and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated and random effects meta-analyses were performed. Certainty of evidence was assessed for RCTs estimates using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. The study protocol has been registered in PROSPERO (CRD42018090434). RESULTS: Ten studies (six RCTs and four QE controlled studies) were eligible for inclusion. Meta-analysis of RCTs showed no effect of DAT in daily life activities (SMD: 0.16; 95% CI: -0.80 to 1.12), depression (SMD: -0.45; 95% CI: -2.81 to 1.91), agitation (SDM: -1.12; 95% CI: -2.67 to 0.43), quality of life (SDM: 0.16; 95% CI: -0.41 to 0.73), and cognitive impairment (SDM: -0.52; 95% CI: -1.33 to 0.30), but it found a beneficial effect in apathy (1 study, n = 37, MD: 1.81; 95% CI: 1.26 to 2.36). All outcomes had a very low certainty of evidence according to GRADE methodology. CONCLUSIONS: RCTs evidence of very low certainty suggests that, in adults with dementia, DAT has no effect in daily life activities, depression, agitation, quality of life, and cognitive impairment, although one small study found an apparent beneficial effect in apathy. More well-designed and correctly reported studies are needed in order to provide a conclusion. TRIAL REGISTRATION: CRD42018090434 (PROSPERO). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12888-018-2009-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6345014/ /pubmed/30678665 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-018-2009-z Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Zafra-Tanaka, Jessica Hanae Pacheco-Barrios, Kevin Tellez, Walter Andree Taype-Rondan, Alvaro Effects of dog-assisted therapy in adults with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Effects of dog-assisted therapy in adults with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Effects of dog-assisted therapy in adults with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Effects of dog-assisted therapy in adults with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of dog-assisted therapy in adults with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Effects of dog-assisted therapy in adults with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | effects of dog-assisted therapy in adults with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6345014/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30678665 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-018-2009-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zafratanakajessicahanae effectsofdogassistedtherapyinadultswithdementiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT pachecobarrioskevin effectsofdogassistedtherapyinadultswithdementiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT tellezwalterandree effectsofdogassistedtherapyinadultswithdementiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT tayperondanalvaro effectsofdogassistedtherapyinadultswithdementiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |