Cargando…
Safety and prognostic value of regadenoson stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in heart transplant recipients
BACKGROUND: There is a critical need for non-invasive methods to detect coronary allograft vasculopathy and to risk stratify heart transplant recipients. Vasodilator stress testing using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is a promising technique for this purpose. We aimed to evaluate t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6345066/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30674318 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-018-0515-2 |
_version_ | 1783389521268703232 |
---|---|
author | Kazmirczak, Felipe Nijjar, Prabhjot S. Zhang, Lei Hughes, Andrew Chen, Ko-Hsuan Amy Okasha, Osama Martin, Cindy M. Akçakaya, Mehmet Farzaneh-Far, Afshin Shenoy, Chetan |
author_facet | Kazmirczak, Felipe Nijjar, Prabhjot S. Zhang, Lei Hughes, Andrew Chen, Ko-Hsuan Amy Okasha, Osama Martin, Cindy M. Akçakaya, Mehmet Farzaneh-Far, Afshin Shenoy, Chetan |
author_sort | Kazmirczak, Felipe |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There is a critical need for non-invasive methods to detect coronary allograft vasculopathy and to risk stratify heart transplant recipients. Vasodilator stress testing using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is a promising technique for this purpose. We aimed to evaluate the safety and the prognostic value of regadenoson stress CMR in heart transplant recipients. METHODS: To evaluate the safety, we assessed adverse effects in a retrospective matched cohort study of consecutive heart transplant recipients who underwent regadenoson stress CMR matched in a 2:1 ratio to age- and gender-matched non-heart transplant patients. To evaluate the prognostic value, we compared the outcomes of patients with abnormal vs. normal regadenoson stress CMRs using a composite endpoint of myocardial infarction, percutaneous intervention, cardiac hospitalization, retransplantation or death. RESULTS: For the safety analysis, 234 regadenoson stress CMR studies were included - 78 performed in 57 heart transplant recipients and 156 performed in non-heart transplant patients. Those in heart transplant recipients were performed at a median of 2.74 years after transplantation. Thirty-four (44%) CMR studies were performed in the first two years after heart transplantation. There were no differences in the rates of adverse effects between heart transplant recipients and non-heart transplant patients. To study the prognostic value of regadenoson stress CMRs, 20 heart transplant recipients with abnormal regadenoson stress CMRs were compared to 37 with normal regadenoson stress CMRs. An abnormal regadenoson stress CMR was associated with a significantly higher incidence of the composite endpoint compared with a normal regadenoson stress CMR (3-year cumulative incidence estimates of 32.1% vs. 12.7%, p = 0.034). CONCLUSIONS: Regadenoson stress CMR is safe and well tolerated in heart transplant recipients, with no incidence of sinus node dysfunction or high-degree atrioventricular block, including in the first two years after heart transplantation. An abnormal regadenoson stress CMR identifies heart transplant recipients at a higher risk for major adverse cardiovascular events. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6345066 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63450662019-01-29 Safety and prognostic value of regadenoson stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in heart transplant recipients Kazmirczak, Felipe Nijjar, Prabhjot S. Zhang, Lei Hughes, Andrew Chen, Ko-Hsuan Amy Okasha, Osama Martin, Cindy M. Akçakaya, Mehmet Farzaneh-Far, Afshin Shenoy, Chetan J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Research BACKGROUND: There is a critical need for non-invasive methods to detect coronary allograft vasculopathy and to risk stratify heart transplant recipients. Vasodilator stress testing using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is a promising technique for this purpose. We aimed to evaluate the safety and the prognostic value of regadenoson stress CMR in heart transplant recipients. METHODS: To evaluate the safety, we assessed adverse effects in a retrospective matched cohort study of consecutive heart transplant recipients who underwent regadenoson stress CMR matched in a 2:1 ratio to age- and gender-matched non-heart transplant patients. To evaluate the prognostic value, we compared the outcomes of patients with abnormal vs. normal regadenoson stress CMRs using a composite endpoint of myocardial infarction, percutaneous intervention, cardiac hospitalization, retransplantation or death. RESULTS: For the safety analysis, 234 regadenoson stress CMR studies were included - 78 performed in 57 heart transplant recipients and 156 performed in non-heart transplant patients. Those in heart transplant recipients were performed at a median of 2.74 years after transplantation. Thirty-four (44%) CMR studies were performed in the first two years after heart transplantation. There were no differences in the rates of adverse effects between heart transplant recipients and non-heart transplant patients. To study the prognostic value of regadenoson stress CMRs, 20 heart transplant recipients with abnormal regadenoson stress CMRs were compared to 37 with normal regadenoson stress CMRs. An abnormal regadenoson stress CMR was associated with a significantly higher incidence of the composite endpoint compared with a normal regadenoson stress CMR (3-year cumulative incidence estimates of 32.1% vs. 12.7%, p = 0.034). CONCLUSIONS: Regadenoson stress CMR is safe and well tolerated in heart transplant recipients, with no incidence of sinus node dysfunction or high-degree atrioventricular block, including in the first two years after heart transplantation. An abnormal regadenoson stress CMR identifies heart transplant recipients at a higher risk for major adverse cardiovascular events. BioMed Central 2019-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6345066/ /pubmed/30674318 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-018-0515-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Kazmirczak, Felipe Nijjar, Prabhjot S. Zhang, Lei Hughes, Andrew Chen, Ko-Hsuan Amy Okasha, Osama Martin, Cindy M. Akçakaya, Mehmet Farzaneh-Far, Afshin Shenoy, Chetan Safety and prognostic value of regadenoson stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in heart transplant recipients |
title | Safety and prognostic value of regadenoson stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in heart transplant recipients |
title_full | Safety and prognostic value of regadenoson stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in heart transplant recipients |
title_fullStr | Safety and prognostic value of regadenoson stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in heart transplant recipients |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety and prognostic value of regadenoson stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in heart transplant recipients |
title_short | Safety and prognostic value of regadenoson stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in heart transplant recipients |
title_sort | safety and prognostic value of regadenoson stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in heart transplant recipients |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6345066/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30674318 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-018-0515-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kazmirczakfelipe safetyandprognosticvalueofregadenosonstresscardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaginginhearttransplantrecipients AT nijjarprabhjots safetyandprognosticvalueofregadenosonstresscardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaginginhearttransplantrecipients AT zhanglei safetyandprognosticvalueofregadenosonstresscardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaginginhearttransplantrecipients AT hughesandrew safetyandprognosticvalueofregadenosonstresscardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaginginhearttransplantrecipients AT chenkohsuanamy safetyandprognosticvalueofregadenosonstresscardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaginginhearttransplantrecipients AT okashaosama safetyandprognosticvalueofregadenosonstresscardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaginginhearttransplantrecipients AT martincindym safetyandprognosticvalueofregadenosonstresscardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaginginhearttransplantrecipients AT akcakayamehmet safetyandprognosticvalueofregadenosonstresscardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaginginhearttransplantrecipients AT farzanehfarafshin safetyandprognosticvalueofregadenosonstresscardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaginginhearttransplantrecipients AT shenoychetan safetyandprognosticvalueofregadenosonstresscardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaginginhearttransplantrecipients |