Cargando…

Safety and prognostic value of regadenoson stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in heart transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: There is a critical need for non-invasive methods to detect coronary allograft vasculopathy and to risk stratify heart transplant recipients. Vasodilator stress testing using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is a promising technique for this purpose. We aimed to evaluate t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kazmirczak, Felipe, Nijjar, Prabhjot S., Zhang, Lei, Hughes, Andrew, Chen, Ko-Hsuan Amy, Okasha, Osama, Martin, Cindy M., Akçakaya, Mehmet, Farzaneh-Far, Afshin, Shenoy, Chetan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6345066/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30674318
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-018-0515-2
_version_ 1783389521268703232
author Kazmirczak, Felipe
Nijjar, Prabhjot S.
Zhang, Lei
Hughes, Andrew
Chen, Ko-Hsuan Amy
Okasha, Osama
Martin, Cindy M.
Akçakaya, Mehmet
Farzaneh-Far, Afshin
Shenoy, Chetan
author_facet Kazmirczak, Felipe
Nijjar, Prabhjot S.
Zhang, Lei
Hughes, Andrew
Chen, Ko-Hsuan Amy
Okasha, Osama
Martin, Cindy M.
Akçakaya, Mehmet
Farzaneh-Far, Afshin
Shenoy, Chetan
author_sort Kazmirczak, Felipe
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is a critical need for non-invasive methods to detect coronary allograft vasculopathy and to risk stratify heart transplant recipients. Vasodilator stress testing using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is a promising technique for this purpose. We aimed to evaluate the safety and the prognostic value of regadenoson stress CMR in heart transplant recipients. METHODS: To evaluate the safety, we assessed adverse effects in a retrospective matched cohort study of consecutive heart transplant recipients who underwent regadenoson stress CMR matched in a 2:1 ratio to age- and gender-matched non-heart transplant patients. To evaluate the prognostic value, we compared the outcomes of patients with abnormal vs. normal regadenoson stress CMRs using a composite endpoint of myocardial infarction, percutaneous intervention, cardiac hospitalization, retransplantation or death. RESULTS: For the safety analysis, 234 regadenoson stress CMR studies were included - 78 performed in 57 heart transplant recipients and 156 performed in non-heart transplant patients. Those in heart transplant recipients were performed at a median of 2.74 years after transplantation. Thirty-four (44%) CMR studies were performed in the first two years after heart transplantation. There were no differences in the rates of adverse effects between heart transplant recipients and non-heart transplant patients. To study the prognostic value of regadenoson stress CMRs, 20 heart transplant recipients with abnormal regadenoson stress CMRs were compared to 37 with normal regadenoson stress CMRs. An abnormal regadenoson stress CMR was associated with a significantly higher incidence of the composite endpoint compared with a normal regadenoson stress CMR (3-year cumulative incidence estimates of 32.1% vs. 12.7%, p = 0.034). CONCLUSIONS: Regadenoson stress CMR is safe and well tolerated in heart transplant recipients, with no incidence of sinus node dysfunction or high-degree atrioventricular block, including in the first two years after heart transplantation. An abnormal regadenoson stress CMR identifies heart transplant recipients at a higher risk for major adverse cardiovascular events.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6345066
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63450662019-01-29 Safety and prognostic value of regadenoson stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in heart transplant recipients Kazmirczak, Felipe Nijjar, Prabhjot S. Zhang, Lei Hughes, Andrew Chen, Ko-Hsuan Amy Okasha, Osama Martin, Cindy M. Akçakaya, Mehmet Farzaneh-Far, Afshin Shenoy, Chetan J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Research BACKGROUND: There is a critical need for non-invasive methods to detect coronary allograft vasculopathy and to risk stratify heart transplant recipients. Vasodilator stress testing using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is a promising technique for this purpose. We aimed to evaluate the safety and the prognostic value of regadenoson stress CMR in heart transplant recipients. METHODS: To evaluate the safety, we assessed adverse effects in a retrospective matched cohort study of consecutive heart transplant recipients who underwent regadenoson stress CMR matched in a 2:1 ratio to age- and gender-matched non-heart transplant patients. To evaluate the prognostic value, we compared the outcomes of patients with abnormal vs. normal regadenoson stress CMRs using a composite endpoint of myocardial infarction, percutaneous intervention, cardiac hospitalization, retransplantation or death. RESULTS: For the safety analysis, 234 regadenoson stress CMR studies were included - 78 performed in 57 heart transplant recipients and 156 performed in non-heart transplant patients. Those in heart transplant recipients were performed at a median of 2.74 years after transplantation. Thirty-four (44%) CMR studies were performed in the first two years after heart transplantation. There were no differences in the rates of adverse effects between heart transplant recipients and non-heart transplant patients. To study the prognostic value of regadenoson stress CMRs, 20 heart transplant recipients with abnormal regadenoson stress CMRs were compared to 37 with normal regadenoson stress CMRs. An abnormal regadenoson stress CMR was associated with a significantly higher incidence of the composite endpoint compared with a normal regadenoson stress CMR (3-year cumulative incidence estimates of 32.1% vs. 12.7%, p = 0.034). CONCLUSIONS: Regadenoson stress CMR is safe and well tolerated in heart transplant recipients, with no incidence of sinus node dysfunction or high-degree atrioventricular block, including in the first two years after heart transplantation. An abnormal regadenoson stress CMR identifies heart transplant recipients at a higher risk for major adverse cardiovascular events. BioMed Central 2019-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6345066/ /pubmed/30674318 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-018-0515-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Kazmirczak, Felipe
Nijjar, Prabhjot S.
Zhang, Lei
Hughes, Andrew
Chen, Ko-Hsuan Amy
Okasha, Osama
Martin, Cindy M.
Akçakaya, Mehmet
Farzaneh-Far, Afshin
Shenoy, Chetan
Safety and prognostic value of regadenoson stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in heart transplant recipients
title Safety and prognostic value of regadenoson stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in heart transplant recipients
title_full Safety and prognostic value of regadenoson stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in heart transplant recipients
title_fullStr Safety and prognostic value of regadenoson stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in heart transplant recipients
title_full_unstemmed Safety and prognostic value of regadenoson stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in heart transplant recipients
title_short Safety and prognostic value of regadenoson stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in heart transplant recipients
title_sort safety and prognostic value of regadenoson stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in heart transplant recipients
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6345066/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30674318
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-018-0515-2
work_keys_str_mv AT kazmirczakfelipe safetyandprognosticvalueofregadenosonstresscardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaginginhearttransplantrecipients
AT nijjarprabhjots safetyandprognosticvalueofregadenosonstresscardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaginginhearttransplantrecipients
AT zhanglei safetyandprognosticvalueofregadenosonstresscardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaginginhearttransplantrecipients
AT hughesandrew safetyandprognosticvalueofregadenosonstresscardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaginginhearttransplantrecipients
AT chenkohsuanamy safetyandprognosticvalueofregadenosonstresscardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaginginhearttransplantrecipients
AT okashaosama safetyandprognosticvalueofregadenosonstresscardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaginginhearttransplantrecipients
AT martincindym safetyandprognosticvalueofregadenosonstresscardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaginginhearttransplantrecipients
AT akcakayamehmet safetyandprognosticvalueofregadenosonstresscardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaginginhearttransplantrecipients
AT farzanehfarafshin safetyandprognosticvalueofregadenosonstresscardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaginginhearttransplantrecipients
AT shenoychetan safetyandprognosticvalueofregadenosonstresscardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaginginhearttransplantrecipients